OKay here goes again.
But we all believe that current Administration policies have failed in the primary responsibilities of preserving national security and providing world leadership.
Where's their proof? How so? Sounds like bullshit.
Serious issues are at stake.
Oh yeah? Which ones? Or is it good enough to say that there are. By just saying that does it get enough people riled up?
We need a change.
Really? hmmmm Let me guess Kerry, right? A man who hasn't shown conviction ever? Oh yeah except the conviction to demoralize the military in Vietnam. Oh yeah and demoralize the military in Afghanistan and Iraq. How many times has he on the record flip flopped anyway? It's an hilarious number.
From the outset, President George W. Bush adopted an overbearing approach to America’s role in the world, relying upon military might and righteousness, insensitive to the concerns of traditional friends and allies, and disdainful of the United Nations.
Opinion. Wheres their facts? Do they really think our military didn't plan out these things? Problem is many of you assholes think things should go 100% smooth. Well in war that doesn't fucking happen. I call bullshit.
Instead of building upon America’s great economic and moral strength to lead other nations in a coordinated campaign to address the causes of terrorism and to stifle its resources, the Administration, motivated more by ideology than by reasoned analysis, struck out on its own.
Hmmm I believe many things were done across the globe to stifle terrorism through economic means. In fact I know so. I call bullshit.
It led the United States into an ill-planned and costly war from which exit is uncertain.
Yeah umm war doesn't have exact starting and ending times. Dipshits.
It justified the invasion of Iraq by manipulation of uncertain intelligence about weapons of mass destruction, and by a cynical campaign to persuade the public that Saddam Hussein was linked to Al Qaeda and the attacks of September 11. The evidence did not support this argument.
Wrong. They linked terrorism. They didn't link 9/11 to Iraq. They knew that Iraq was a terroist state as well and we all knew a 9/11 could happen at their hands someday as well. They also said that there was a relationship between Iraq and Al-Qaeda, which was recently proven by the 9/11 commission. Where's the proof of manipulation of intelligence? Is it there feeling and opinion they did so? Yes. And that it all it is. I call bullshit.
I'm going to stop there. I have a Father's Day dinner to go to. I have given you enough. If you can't fucking figure it out from that, then I pity your beligerant ignorance, hostility and negativity.
