Kilmoll makes 3 retarded posts in one week - Righties jizz

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » June 7, 2005, 12:14 am

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:
Zaelath wrote:Everyone else is wrong though, you're the zen fucking master and can see through all the lies.

Nope. That is the exact opposite of what I profess on a daily basis. The wiseman knows how very little he truly knows.

Apparently you're so deluded by rhetoric in general you don't even understand the difference between what you claim, and what you do.

Midnyte_Ragebringer · Post by **Midnyte_Ragebringer** » June 7, 2005, 1:15 am

Zaelath wrote:
Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:
Zaelath wrote:Everyone else is wrong though, you're the zen fucking master and can see through all the lies.

Nope. That is the exact opposite of what I profess on a daily basis. The wiseman knows how very little he truly knows.
Apparently you're so deluded by rhetoric in general you don't even understand the difference between what you claim, and what you do.

Ah, your wit is so predictable and borish.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » June 7, 2005, 1:54 am

it's boorish, professor. if you're going to try out all these fancy two syllable words, you are going to have to learn how to spell them.

I would think that you of all people would know how to spell boorish. you must have it stamped on your fucking forehead.

Nick · Post by **Nick** » June 7, 2005, 2:04 am

Ah, your wit is so predictable and borish.

At least he has some.

Kilmoll wrote:

If they outnumber us population, then why do we outnumber them so greatly in troops provided for any military action or sent for disaster aid? What kind of result would it be when you figured in how much the U.S. spent on sending all those troops and equipment? Yeah.....I think you might find a big fucking swing.

A. The USA spends more on it's military than any other nation on the planet, something you fail to understand as being wholly shameful. Exactly how many bombs that can blow up the planet do you actualy need?
B. If the troops and equipment have been sent in illegally (I.E - an invasion) it doesn't exactly count as aid. More like um...murder.

In fairness, the US does supply aid, (see how I can admit fact!! thats the difference!) but frankly for the amount of trouble it causes with it's particular brand of capitalism it should.

Don't believe the murder I talk of? Take a few looks at google pics for some of the cherished memories we all can now hold dear thanks to your "aid".

Cid wrote:

You will be the first in line to suck Bushes dick if anyone was to attack you.

Yeah, that's why Bush was begging the rest of the world after 9/11 for our support. Oh and I think you will find the EU has a big enough selection of armies to look after itself, unless it is (as has been stated) attacked by the biggest warmongers on the planet. The USA.
Which wouldn't happen because if it came to a Nuclear war, you would be just as fucked as us. So get off your fucking cross.

Midnyte wrote:

Terrorists attacked us. We went to Afghanistan and worked on them. While we were there we decided to take out that piece of shit Saddam and place a democracy right in the heart of the religiously fucked up middle east. I don't care of the reasons given, we have covered all of them anyway. That is what happened. Turns out Iraq sure had OMGIAMRETARDEDCAUSEALOTISTWOWORDS of terrorist wackos in it as well. Oh wait thats right, the media planted the notion that all the terrorists would flock to Iraq once the US went in and everyone bought it hook line and sinker. LMAO

You are proud of invading another country and enforcing your ideals on them? Ok......are you a nazi? I know the word can be bandied about a lot, but really, what you just said is so far beyond the realms of reasonable thought you actually do resemble a fucking fascist dictator at this point.

Covering all the reasons is irrelevant if you are lying.

You apparantly appear to be under the impression the insurgents are from Iraq, um....please tell me why they are called insurgents then, retard.
Not to mention it's a solid fucking fact that is not denied by the US ONE BIT.

I love how you're ending every post with a ROFLNAZI!! these days, I think it's cool you can find time to stop wanking Metanis off to type it out.

cid · Post by **cid** » June 7, 2005, 2:28 am

Nick wrote:The Fuck America bandwagon? WRONG, retard, so fucking wrong it's laughable you even attempt this one you whiny ass right wing redneck cracker spawn bastard.

Nick wrote: Yeah, that's why Bush was begging the rest of the world after 9/11 for our support. Oh and I think you will find the EU has a big enough selection of armies to look after itself, unless it is (as has been stated) attacked by the biggest warmongers on the planet. The USA.

You talk so much shit, you can't even keep your story straight.

Nick · Post by **Nick** » June 7, 2005, 2:48 am

Stating a simple fucking fact is something you clearly are not capable of comprehending you pathetic moron.

cid · Post by **cid** » June 7, 2005, 3:08 am

That is you best come back? You call me the moron? It sure is funny that every time you get bitch slapped, your posts always get smaller.
Coincidence?

Nick · Post by **Nick** » June 7, 2005, 3:28 am

Yes I call you the moron.

Ok, bitchslapped? Puhlease. You couldn't bitchslap a geriatric cripple Terry Schiavo alike without falling over your own fucking forehead and splitting that useless excuse of a brain of yours in two.

As usual your posts are nothing but fucking one liner bullshitfests with no substance other than to highlight both your complete lack of gorm and total lack of humour.
Coincidence LOL!!!!?!!1111cretinousfuck?

I guess freedom of speech is designed so handicaps like you don't go about shooting everyone up because people laugh so very very very hard at your absurdly moronic concepts of reality. Jesus christ Cid the day you bitchslap me is the day the fucking world ends.

BUT THEN MAYBE GEORGE BUSH WILL SAVE US?!?!!

Next.

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » June 7, 2005, 3:36 am

Meh, you need to pick your fights more carefully.. Cid's by far and away one of the nicer yanks on the board, and more a realist than most.

Not that most Americans aren't nice people =)

Nick · Post by **Nick** » June 7, 2005, 3:45 am

Not to me he isn't, then again, not surprising. Also, I think I'll just do what I like thanks.

I agree with the US people (most of them that I know) being essentially decent though. (OMG SHOCK)

Hesten · Post by **Hesten** » June 7, 2005, 8:18 am

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/8599

Here is an article which helps to clear up where the aid numbers come from.

Does it hurt to see us savages (norway, sweden, denmark), give that much more cash pr person than the US? Just curious.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » June 7, 2005, 8:43 am

Not at all. You don't supply troops so you make contributions with cash. Which since I am fairly certain your per capita income is also higher and you should pay more per capita in aid.

The one thing you and Kelshara failed to read at all from that link: aid numbers are only gotten from the actual amount of cash and loans given per country. Those numbers do not include food, medical supplies, troops, or other supplies given by each country. Would you care to wager on the changes that might make to those numbers?

miir · Post by **miir** » June 7, 2005, 10:26 am

Those numbers do not include food, medical supplies, troops, or other supplies given by each country.

I'm afraid you're mistaken.... except for the troops.

Aside from the tsunami relief effort, you'd be hard pressed to find any other instance of a notable contingent of 'troops' being deployed under the banner of foreign aid.

Hesten · Post by **Hesten** » June 7, 2005, 11:44 am

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:Not at all. You don't supply troops so you make contributions with cash. Which since I am fairly certain your per capita income is also higher and you should pay more per capita in aid.

The one thing you and Kelshara failed to read at all from that link: aid numbers are only gotten from the actual amount of cash and loans given per country. Those numbers do not include food, medical supplies, troops, or other supplies given by each country. Would you care to wager on the changes that might make to those numbers?

Actually Denmark are one of the few countries that still support your war (and yes, i didnt vote for the sitting government, so not my fault

), and we got troops stationed in Iraq too, for god knows what reason. Send them home and let the idiots who started the war sort the mess

.
At least we got our 1 submarine back

Chmee · Post by **Chmee** » June 7, 2005, 12:39 pm

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:Not at all. You don't supply troops so you make contributions with cash. Which since I am fairly certain your per capita income is also higher and you should pay more per capita in aid.

The U.S. has higher per capita income.

From http://www.nationmaster.com PPP GDP per capita.

United States $33108.13 per person
Norway $29563.65 per person
Denmark $27375.46 per person
Sweden $24250.72 per person

As far as aid goes, I would be fine with the U.S. government giving less (or even zero) aid. Government to government aid doesn't have the best record for being terribly effective. All to often the money just goes to the government when the government itself is the cause of most of the problems. At least in long term aid, in case of natural disasters I think it is usually more effective. If you really want to help poorer countries out you probably would do far more good by eliminating subsidies (particularly agricultural ones) and liberalizing trade and immigration policy.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » June 7, 2005, 1:43 pm

Hesten wrote: At least we got our 1 submarine back

You're tied with Canada! It would be a mighty battle between you two!

Niffoni · Post by **Niffoni** » June 7, 2005, 1:48 pm

Winnow wrote:
Hesten wrote: At least we got our 1 submarine back
You're tied with Canada! It would be a mighty battle between you two!

LIES! Just out of my office window I can see two of our subs in the harbour!

Oh wait, that one's Denmark's...

Lynks · Post by **Lynks** » June 7, 2005, 1:55 pm

We will get Sean Connery to captain ours. You guys can get Harrison Ford.

Niffoni · Post by **Niffoni** » June 7, 2005, 1:57 pm

And then we will have the world's shortest naval war. Woo!

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » June 7, 2005, 2:01 pm

The one thing you and Kelshara failed to read at all from that link: aid numbers are only gotten from the actual amount of cash and loans given per country. Those numbers do not include food, medical supplies, troops, or other supplies given by each country. Would you care to wager on the changes that might make to those numbers?

Nope I read it. Came across to me like a whiny attempt to justify your lack of aid. And btw, those other countries give food, medical supplies, troops and other supplies as well. Norway currently has (and have had) quite a few troops in Afghanistan, including parts of the air force. Also quite a few in Iraq who are not part of the idiotic war but rather cleaning up your mess.

Not our fault you're cheap warmongers.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » June 7, 2005, 2:06 pm

Kelshara wrote:
Not our fault you're cheap warmongers.

Our Tomahawk Missiles cost 1 million each bitch! We're not cheap!

Fash · Post by **Fash** » June 7, 2005, 3:19 pm

that's the ridiculousness of the US... how could 1 missile cost 1 million dollars? how could 1 plane cost 15 million dollars? /sigh

edit: sigh, miir....

Lohrno · Post by **Lohrno** » June 7, 2005, 3:22 pm

I think because of 3 things.

1) They aren't churning them out like in a Crayon or a Car factory. Costs are higher to produce when you're not producing them in mass quantities.

2) Research and development.

3) Heavy use of titanium. These things need titanium or aluminum to fly well. Titanium is not cheap.

miir · Post by **miir** » June 7, 2005, 3:24 pm

Ridiculously high safety standards and the inability of the average american to spell ridiculous.

miir · Post by **miir** » June 7, 2005, 3:25 pm

Lynks wrote:We will get Sean Connery to captain ours. You guys can get Harrison Ford.

We'll take Jack Bauer for teh win!

Mezzdat · Post by **Mezzdat** » June 10, 2005, 5:23 pm

We don't bother enforcing our fucking "democracy" (read - corrupt fucking figurehead murderous assholes - i.e Saddam Hussein) because it's not our fucking business, look after your own country and leave the rest of the world to do the same.

I haven't had time to read the entire thread, but I hope this is a joke. There are times when the world does need to interfere in others business. Mass genocide, holocaust, and such. I'm not saying Iraq was the right decision, but I am saying that sitting back and only worrying about yourself is a neglectful thing to do, and it will bite you in the ass.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » June 10, 2005, 6:03 pm

miir wrote:Ridiculously high safety standards and the inability of the average american to spell ridiculous.

Should we point out the inability of the rest of the world to spell the word "color"?

miir · Post by **miir** » June 10, 2005, 7:15 pm

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:Should we point out the inability of the rest of the world to spell the word "color"?

Colour is infact, the original, correct spelling. For some reason or another, be it low education standards or laziness, Americans have changed the spelling numerous words from their original english spelling.

The difference is that colour is an accepted spelling, and rediculous is misspelling based on the common mispronunciation of the word.

I suppose it won't be long before americans dictionaries start listing 'nucular' and an acceptable spelling of nuclear.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » June 10, 2005, 7:31 pm

ass > arse

Nick · Post by **Nick** » June 11, 2005, 12:17 am

Calling someone an asshole sounds a lot gayer than a quick, off the cuff,, Arsehole.