HAHAHHA Real Life ExampleWinnow wrote:Sueven wrote:I was in CT. It was probably about 60% for Gore in 2000.
I tried to save CT but the liberals booted me!![]()
Funny you said that about CT. Celestial Tomb had conservative leadership and steamrolled its way to success and prosperity and then, with the influx of liberals, our officer corps doubled overnight and CT bogged down into countless votes, indecision and big goverment!
Don't let this happen to our country. Keep Kerry out!
How would the vote go if it happened today?
Hahahahahahahaha!I tried to save CT but the liberals booted me!
Funny you said that about CT. Celestial Tomb had conservative leadership and steamrolled its way to success and prosperity and then, with the influx of liberals, our officer corps doubled overnight and CT bogged down into countless votes, indecision and big goverment!
Don't let this happen to our country. Keep Kerry out!

I thought Xan was against Bush?
Sirton makes a point though, I dont want a president steamrolling other innocent countrys to get there resources and fucking over our reputation in the entire world, but im sure GW would make a better guild leader then John Kerry
Sirton makes a point though, I dont want a president steamrolling other innocent countrys to get there resources and fucking over our reputation in the entire world, but im sure GW would make a better guild leader then John Kerry
-xzionis human mage on mannoroth
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
I dont know how he felt about Bush...Hes white, male, military, stationed in the south if I remember correctly..But being for someone or against them doesnt put you in certain spot, so I really cant say for or against Bush. Example, I got a Uncle who hates Bush. But on a list of issues he was 90% agreement with Bush. More than me even. He still hated him.
- Kilmoll the Sexy
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 5295
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 3:31 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: bunkeru2k
- Location: Ohio
Sirton, you forgot that he also used his power to siphon cash and make a quick buck. Has to be Republican. The collapse did happen under liberal leadership though!
You know, you could use a lot of guilds to show different governments throughout the world.
FoH was the U.S.S.R. Ruled by an iron fist. Feared by most and ran over anyone in their way. Collapsed when their hard line dictatorship ended.
CT was your U.S. of today. Corruption and greed ruining a collection of offices (Congress) and the guild leader (President) that was built and prosperous by fighting for the little guy.
CD is the one that survives today and is what the U.S. ideal would be. Using DKP to keep democracy without corruption.
I am sure there are a lot more examples.
You know, you could use a lot of guilds to show different governments throughout the world.
FoH was the U.S.S.R. Ruled by an iron fist. Feared by most and ran over anyone in their way. Collapsed when their hard line dictatorship ended.
CT was your U.S. of today. Corruption and greed ruining a collection of offices (Congress) and the guild leader (President) that was built and prosperous by fighting for the little guy.
CD is the one that survives today and is what the U.S. ideal would be. Using DKP to keep democracy without corruption.
I am sure there are a lot more examples.
- Kilmoll the Sexy
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 5295
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 3:31 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: bunkeru2k
- Location: Ohio
- Kilmoll the Sexy
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 5295
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 3:31 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: bunkeru2k
- Location: Ohio
First of all - CD is not a democracy.
Second of all - While I may be a liberal in terms of real life government - for an everquest guild - I am not for it. I absolutely hated the voting in CT.
Third of all - I didn't expand the amount of officers - I was basically left with them when Xanupox left the guild.
Second of all - While I may be a liberal in terms of real life government - for an everquest guild - I am not for it. I absolutely hated the voting in CT.
Third of all - I didn't expand the amount of officers - I was basically left with them when Xanupox left the guild.
I agree..were to many officers for a equal vote council. When was in it was setup like the executive branch the cabinet...GL was president and had Veto power, to cut through the red tape.Second of all - While I may be a liberal in terms of real life government - for an everquest guild - I am not for it. I absolutely hated the voting in CT.
- Kilmoll the Sexy
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 5295
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 3:31 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: bunkeru2k
- Location: Ohio
Now don't get defensive Thess. I don't think most people believe you were the reason for the collapse. You do notice it sucks that the one in power when the shit hits the fan is the one who ends up looking like the bad guy?
Last edited by Kilmoll the Sexy on September 24, 2004, 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yeah i remember most people in CT being against Bush. Of the orlando members at least the only people who were for Bush i think were ferine and me at the time, of course we didnt know what the fuck we were talking about, i do remember some posts after 9/11 praising Bush's handling on our message board thoughAslanna wrote:ex-CTer.. Don't like Bush. I don't believe he's been good for this country.Raistin wrote:Has anyone noticed a 99.9% of ex CT members are bush supporters, thess being the only smart one.
-xzionis human mage on mannoroth
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
-
- Almost 1337
- Posts: 903
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 10:13 pm
- Location: Vancouver BC
- Contact:
More info on Electoral votes and how they stand:
Need Ohio!WASHINGTON — An analysis of battleground states shows that while the presidential election is very close in national polls, state polls show a slight edge for President Bush (search) over rival John Kerry (search).
Kerry is defending more blue states, or traditionally Democratic-leaning states, that Al Gore won in 2000 while Bush has a more focused fight to keep states in the red column, or traditionally Republican-leaning. The president also has an electoral college (search) advantage he didn't have in 2000.
Part of the reason is that America's population has shifted to Bush country in the last census, shifting congressional districts and electoral votes his way.
Seven Bush states gained 11 electoral votes after reapportionment, while four Bush states lost four electoral votes. That's a net gain of seven electoral votes if Bush wins the same states he did in 2000, when he barely won the electoral college with 271 votes.
The shift means Kerry must win one big Bush state or several smaller ones to gain an electoral college advantage.
"Kerry would have to carry a significant state with a significant number of electoral votes away from the Bush column, which really gets down to Ohio or Florida," said election analyst Ron Faucheux. Florida has 27 electoral votes. Ohio has 20. Kerry is tied with Bush in Ohio and polling below Bush but within the margin of error in Florida.
More poll stuff. I'll keep it on this already hella long thread:
Hope you enjoyed those debates! Either the debates don't matter or Bush did a better job than you think in them.(CNN) -- Although most Americans who have been polled say they think Sen. John Kerry did the better job in the debates, the Democratic nominee appears to have lost some ground to President Bush in the popularity contest, according to a CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released Sunday.
The poll interviewed 1,013 adult Americans by telephone Thursday through Saturday, including 942 who identified themselves as registered voters and 788 who indicated they were likely to vote.
In the previous Gallup poll, taken October 9-10 after the second debate on October 8, Kerry and Bush were tied at 48 percent among registered voters. (Full story)
The latest poll, taken after the third and final debate last Wednesday in Tempe, Arizona, indicated an edge of 49 percent to 46 percent for Bush among the same group.
That is still practically even -- given the margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. The October 9-10 poll had a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.
But among likely voters Bush had a larger spread -- 52 percent to 44 percent. That compared with a 49 percent to 46 percent edge for Bush in the previous poll.
That's a bad picture of Milla Jovovich. Get a better one!
http://images.google.com/images?q=Milla+Jovovich&hl=en
http://images.google.com/images?q=Milla+Jovovich&hl=en
I was having a lot of doubts earlier but now it looks like Kerry is going to have this election wrapped up. We will get Pennsylvania, so in order to win, all Kerry has to do is get Ohio or Florida, im surprised to see that all the ohio polls are now showing kerry ahead
But one thing is for sure it will come down to whoever gets 2 out of 3 of Ohio/Florida/Pennsylvania
Of course, anything can still happen
But one thing is for sure it will come down to whoever gets 2 out of 3 of Ohio/Florida/Pennsylvania
Of course, anything can still happen
-xzionis human mage on mannoroth
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
Kerry was supposed to get Pennsylvania. He would lose for sure if he didn't. Gore got it in 2000.Xzion wrote:I was having a lot of doubts earlier but now it looks like Kerry is going to have this election wrapped up. We will get Pennsylvania, so in order to win, all Kerry has to do is get Ohio or Florida, im surprised to see that all the ohio polls are now showing kerry ahead
But one thing is for sure it will come down to whoever gets 2 out of 3 of Ohio/Florida/Pennsylvania
Of course, anything can still happen
Ohio is the biggie. Florida is going to be Bush one way or another.
- Dregor Thule
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 8:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Xathlak
- PSN ID: dregor77
- Location: Oakville, Ontario
I thought you were the puppet propped up as a front for the second in command so he could do his dirty work in peace.Sirton wrote:Actually I setup CT to work as the executive brance of the US. when I was there like Xanu. was master of war. Toshira was secretary of treasury. Good view there kilmoll.
Whos Kelsh?
Not really, he was more the "social/political" leader of CT, who gave us a slightly better image and held some power over Xanu, which is always good. I did notice that when sirton stepped down CT did slowly start to fall, xanu being the essential bad-ass heartless raidmaster with sirton keeping him on a loose leash was the perfict team, although they did bitch at eachother sometimesDregor Thule wrote:I thought you were the puppet propped up as a front for the second in command so he could do his dirty work in peace.Sirton wrote:Actually I setup CT to work as the executive brance of the US. when I was there like Xanu. was master of war. Toshira was secretary of treasury. Good view there kilmoll.
Whos Kelsh?
-xzionis human mage on mannoroth
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
You're just pissed because the only reason you were in CT was to CoH us past mobs in NToV!Xzion wrote:Not really, he was more the "social/political" leader of CT, who gave us a slightly better image and held some power over Xanu, which is always good. I did notice that when sirton stepped down CT did slowly start to fall, xanu being the essential bad-ass heartless raidmaster with sirton keeping him on a loose leash was the perfict team, although they did bitch at eachother sometimesDregor Thule wrote:I thought you were the puppet propped up as a front for the second in command so he could do his dirty work in peace.Sirton wrote:Actually I setup CT to work as the executive brance of the US. when I was there like Xanu. was master of war. Toshira was secretary of treasury. Good view there kilmoll.
Whos Kelsh?
- Dregor Thule
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 8:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Xathlak
- PSN ID: dregor77
- Location: Oakville, Ontario
Kerry 257 Bush 274 Thanks Hawaii! Aloha : )

Today at work I convinced a democrat not to vote. I told them we would cancel each other out anyway so we should both not vote and save the hassle.
SUCKER!
Time for some last minute campaigning in PA and WI.
2004. RIG THE VOTE!
It should be close with all the democrat voter scams going on!

Today at work I convinced a democrat not to vote. I told them we would cancel each other out anyway so we should both not vote and save the hassle.
SUCKER!

Time for some last minute campaigning in PA and WI.
2004. RIG THE VOTE!
It should be close with all the democrat voter scams going on!
- miir
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 11501
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 3:06 pm
- XBL Gamertag: miir1
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
Looks like the scamming is paying off!!!Lohrno wrote:And the republican sponsored "help you vote" drive that are shredding Dem registrations...Winnow wrote: It should be close with all the democrat voter scams going on!
-=Lohrno
Electoral Vote Predictor 2004: Kerry 260 Bush 254
I've got 99 problems and I'm not dealing with any of them - Lay-Z
The best predictor is the gambling line:Chidoro wrote:298 Kerry vs. 231 Bush now
I hate polls because they don't seem to mean shit, even according to the hoster of that site
http://www.bodog.com/sports-betting/non ... events.jsp
it's actually closed to
+110 Kerry
-140 Bush
That's the closest it's been since I started watching it. (negative number is the favored for those that aren't familiar with betting lines. Bet 1.00 to win 1.10 if you want Kerry to win or bet 1.40 to win 1.00 for Bush.)
Bush is still favored by the gamblers but not by as much.
What I like most about the lead Bush has held in the gambling lines is that normally the lines have to be adjusted for popularity which would mean Bush would lose some bets if Kerry was more popular and the line would artificially move in Kerry's favor. That isn't happening...another thing I like is that unlike in Football when there can be upsets even if a team is popular, in the case of a presidential bet, you can be sure the people are also voting for the same person they're betting on which directly affects the outcome unlike in Football.
BTW, that line is moving like crazy. Since the first post it's now:
Kerry +105
Bush -135
To be fair, the smart money bets late which favors Kerry actually at this point if it keeps moving in his favor.
BTW, that line is moving like crazy. Since the first post it's now:
Kerry +105
Bush -135
To be fair, the smart money bets late which favors Kerry actually at this point if it keeps moving in his favor.
i do think that the gambling line is a representation of what "the market" thinks will happen.Winnow wrote:The best predictor is the gambling line:Chidoro wrote:298 Kerry vs. 231 Bush now
I hate polls because they don't seem to mean shit, even according to the hoster of that site
http://www.bodog.com/sports-betting/non ... events.jsp
it's actually closed to
+110 Kerry
-140 Bush
That's the closest it's been since I started watching it. (negative number is the favored for those that aren't familiar with betting lines. Bet 1.00 to win 1.10 if you want Kerry to win or bet 1.40 to win 1.00 for Bush.)
Bush is still favored by the gamblers but not by as much.
But it assumes a few things:
1. the betting population is representative of the population at large
2. the people betting are making uniformly informed opinions.
i would suggest taht both are hardly correct.
I think that many betters are making good decisions, but many people are simply voting for who they like.
I would also suggest that the gambler population is probably 60+% male, and i wouldn't be surprised if it was 75%+, and males skew slightly Republican.
You've never been to a Vegas sportsbook! There are lots of african american gamblers! : )Voronwë wrote:
i do think that the gambling line is a representation of what "the market" thinks will happen.
But it assumes a few things:
1. the betting population is representative of the population at large
2. the people betting are making uniformly informed opinions.
i would suggest taht both are hardly correct.
I think that many betters are making good decisions, but many people are simply voting for who they like.
I would also suggest that the gambler population is probably 60+% male, and i wouldn't be surprised if it was 75%+, and males skew slightly Republican.
Good points though.
I have to go w/ Winnow here... the sportsbook reflects what people think will happen, and how certain they are, so while it drops a few variables it takes into account more than most polls. ie, as the amount you bet increases you're less likely to just bet on your candidate than on the opposition if you think they will win. Republican skew of males doesn't really mean much.
IIRC the sportsbook has historically been one of the most accurate predictors of elections.
Certainly worked well in the recent Australian elections.. all the polls were very close here, sports book said something like; incumbent -180, challenger +120.. ended up a large swing to the incumbent.
IIRC the sportsbook has historically been one of the most accurate predictors of elections.
Certainly worked well in the recent Australian elections.. all the polls were very close here, sports book said something like; incumbent -180, challenger +120.. ended up a large swing to the incumbent.
May 2003 - "Mission Accomplished"
June 2005 - "The mission isn't easy, and it will not be accomplished overnight"
-- G W Bush, freelance writer for The Daily Show.
June 2005 - "The mission isn't easy, and it will not be accomplished overnight"
-- G W Bush, freelance writer for The Daily Show.