Does no Convention Boost matter for Kerry?

What do you think about the world?
Post Reply
User avatar
Winnow
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 27727
Joined: July 5, 2002, 1:56 pm
Location: A Special Place in Hell

Does no Convention Boost matter for Kerry?

Post by Winnow »

Front page USA Today with CNN and Gallup Polls also as sources:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicsel ... erry_x.htm
Poll: No boost for Kerry after convention
By Susan Page, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — Last week's Democratic convention boosted voters' views of John Kerry but failed to give him the expected bump in the race against President Bush, a USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll finds.
In the survey, taken Friday and Saturday, Kerry trailed Bush 50%-46% among likely voters. Independent candidate Ralph Nader was at 2%.

The survey showed Kerry losing 1 percentage point and Bush gaining 4 percentage points from a poll taken the week before the Boston convention.

The change in support was within the poll's margin of error of +/–4 percentage points in the sample of 763 likely voters. But it was nonetheless surprising, the first time since the chaotic Democratic convention in 1972 that a candidate hasn't gained ground during his convention.

USA TODAY extended its survey to Sunday to get a fuller picture of what's happening.

A Newsweek poll taken Thursday and Friday gave the Democrats a 49%-42% lead. Over three weeks, that reflected a 4-point "bounce" for Kerry, the smallest ever in the Newsweek poll.

Among registered voters in the USA TODAY poll, Kerry and Bush each had 47%. Bush was up 4 points, Kerry unchanged from the pre-convention survey.

Analysts say the lack of a bounce may reflect the intensely polarized contest. Nearly nine of 10 voters say their minds are made up and won't change. "The convention, typically a kicking-off point for a party, is now merely a reaffirmation" of where voters stand, said David Moore, senior editor of the Gallup Poll.

"In a race this tight, the polls are going to be all over the place," said Kerry spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter. "Most importantly, voters now clearly trust John Kerry more than Bush to lead and defend America."

But Matthew Dowd, chief strategist for the Bush campaign, said "history doesn't bode well" for Kerry. Since World War II, every challenger who has unseated a president has led after his convention.

Democratic leaders had expressed delight about the convention, which showed a united party and emphasized national-security issues. Those surveyed gave the convention and its candidate high marks:

• Kerry's acceptance speech Thursday was rated as "excellent" by 26%, a more positive response than Bush got four years ago at his convention. A 44% plurality said the Democrats were "about right" in criticizing Bush; 30% said they went too far.

• Views of Kerry's personal characteristics and leadership improved across the board; views of Bush didn't change much. Bush's edge in handling terrorism was shaved to 12 points from 18 before the convention. In a switch, Kerry is trusted more to handle the responsibilities of commander in chief, 51%-46%.

• Kerry's military service in Vietnam, a theme of the convention, is seen as a plus. A 52% majority says that experience would help him be an effective president. More than one in four say it makes them more likely to vote for him.
I expected Bush to be down by ten points after the convention. Ugly.
User avatar
kyoukan
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 8548
Joined: July 5, 2002, 3:33 am
Location: Vancouver

Post by kyoukan »

do you ever stop trolling? go build a model or a fly a kite or something. you very seriously make me want to vomit.
User avatar
Winnow
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 27727
Joined: July 5, 2002, 1:56 pm
Location: A Special Place in Hell

Post by Winnow »

kyoukan wrote:do you ever stop trolling? go build a model or a fly a kite or something. you very seriously make me want to vomit.
I'll take that as a yes.
User avatar
Pherr the Dorf
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2913
Joined: January 31, 2003, 9:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Sonoma County Calimifornia

Post by Pherr the Dorf »

a USA today poll... :shock:
The first duty of a patriot is to question the government

Jefferson
User avatar
Winnow
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 27727
Joined: July 5, 2002, 1:56 pm
Location: A Special Place in Hell

Post by Winnow »

Pherr the Dorf wrote:a USA today poll... :shock:
Gallup poll.
User avatar
Thess
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1036
Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:34 am
Location: Connecticut

Post by Thess »

I don't want Bush to be far behind in the polls personally - I'm scared of what he would do if he was.
User avatar
Krurk
Gets Around
Gets Around
Posts: 188
Joined: July 7, 2002, 9:40 pm

Post by Krurk »

There have been several polls done, showing everything from a marginal gain to a five point boost. Keep in mind, some of the polls were conducted during the entire week of the convention, which means some people were polled BEFORE Kerry gave his speech.

Also, unlike most conventions, Kerry had already selected a running mate, and that resulted in a gain in the polls.

This election is too close to call at the moment, but over the long term it can be argued that Kerry has been gaining steadily on Bush. Polls are starting to show severe shifts in likability, 'shared my beliefs', trust and credibility as shifting away from Bush to Kerry.
User avatar
Winnow
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 27727
Joined: July 5, 2002, 1:56 pm
Location: A Special Place in Hell

Post by Winnow »

Thess wrote:I don't want Bush to be far behind in the polls personally - I'm scared of what he would do if he was.
If you're taking the conspiracy point of view, you realize there's no hope of winning. Bush can monitor the polls and dial-a-threat of appropriate size to assure victory.

Realistically, we can take a look at the poll and wonder why Kerry didn't get a boost after the convention as expected. I'm personally surprised he isn't substantially ahead.

I counted on Bush having to fight all the way up to and through the Republican Convention just to be even in the polls with Kerry. As it stands, Kerry may have to resort to more dirty tactics than Bush. Kerry called on Bush for a civil race but he's already mocking Bush's campaign which isn't attacking Kerry. It just doesn't seem to bode well for Kerry atm. Odds are world events will favor Bush gaining a few votes and while Bush doesn't really have to do anything except tell us we're safer but not completely safe yet, Kerry must now figure out a way to gain votes. While some may think the economy should be better right now, it is improving and isn't expected to worsen before the election either.

While this poll has a margin of error and I don't believe Bush actually gained 4 points in the polls from before the convention took place, I think both sides are a little surprised at the slow reaction to Kerry's speech.
User avatar
Forthe
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1719
Joined: July 3, 2002, 4:15 pm
XBL Gamertag: Brutus709
Location: The Political Newf

Post by Forthe »

Winnow wrote:
Thess wrote:I don't want Bush to be far behind in the polls personally - I'm scared of what he would do if he was.
If you're taking the conspiracy point of view, you realize there's no hope of winning. Bush can monitor the polls and dial-a-threat of appropriate size to assure victory.

Realistically, we can take a look at the poll and wonder why Kerry didn't get a boost after the convention as expected. I'm personally surprised he isn't substantially ahead.

I counted on Bush having to fight all the way up to and through the Republican Convention just to be even in the polls with Kerry. As it stands, Kerry may have to resort to more dirty tactics than Bush. Kerry called on Bush for a civil race but he's already mocking Bush's campaign which isn't attacking Kerry. It just doesn't seem to bode well for Kerry atm. Odds are world events will favor Bush gaining a few votes and while Bush doesn't really have to do anything except tell us we're safer but not completely safe yet, Kerry must now figure out a way to gain votes. While some may think the economy should be better right now, it is improving and isn't expected to worsen before the election either.

While this poll has a margin of error and I don't believe Bush actually gained 4 points in the polls from before the convention took place, I think both sides are a little surprised at the slow reaction to Kerry's speech.
Yesterdays Newsweek poll had Kerry at 49 vs Bush at 42. I didn't notice them giving the margin of error tho and poll results within the margin of error don't really tell us much. That was with Nader included.

Kerry did pretty well. His image has improved substancially in both polls and people are beginning to believe he can win.
All posts are personal opinion.
My opinion may == || != my guild's.
"All spelling mistakes were not on purpose as I dont know shit ." - Torrkir
User avatar
Zaelath
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4621
Joined: April 11, 2003, 5:53 am
Location: Canberra

Post by Zaelath »

Maybe people have decided already this time? I don't know the actual percentages, but the US seems filthy with partisan jackasses on both sides and a slim core of moderates/swing voters that decide who gets to rule your country every four years. Yes, yes, I know you all feel like your vote counts, and the democratic ideal works, enjoy that if it helps you sleep at night.

I just don't think that many swing voters have been waiting for the dog and pony show this time, you certainly can't compare this election to the "uncertainty" of Bush V's Gore last time.
User avatar
Karae
Almost 1337
Almost 1337
Posts: 878
Joined: July 3, 2002, 5:32 pm
Location: Orange County, California
Contact:

Post by Karae »

I don't think it matters much, but, as a disclaimer to that statement, I've held the opinion for a long time that polls are absolutely meaningless and I believe that's more true in this election than in recent history. I think the circumstances of this election are attracting people who do not typically vote, and therefore are not typically polled, to Kerry's side and encouraging and mobilizing them to vote in record numbers. I think his speech further encouraged and mobilized their vote, you just can't see it because they don't pop up on poll radar.
War pickles men in a brine of disgust and dread.
Chmee
Almost 1337
Almost 1337
Posts: 942
Joined: July 7, 2002, 11:13 pm

Post by Chmee »

Winnow wrote:Realistically, we can take a look at the poll and wonder why Kerry didn't get a boost after the convention as expected. I'm personally surprised he isn't substantially ahead.
Maybe they listened to Kerry's speech. :p
No nation was ever ruined by trade.

– Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
Kluden
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1827
Joined: November 13, 2002, 7:12 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Kluden »

What you have is 10 percent of people still being of the mindset of "Unsure or voting for other than those two".

So what? The convention wasn't enough to sway their vote. Of course it wasn't, it is a stage, with someone yelling what could be empty promises. The republican convention will yield the same thing. People see through the pep rally bullshit now a days, and conventions are only for the circle jerking party liners.

Educated decisions will be made when the debates occur, and that is when you will see the biggest swing in the polls.
User avatar
Thess
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1036
Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:34 am
Location: Connecticut

Post by Thess »

I thought the convention was for those psychopath pro-lifers to protest
User avatar
Kelshara
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4176
Joined: November 18, 2002, 10:44 am
Location: Norway

Post by Kelshara »

Maybe they listened to Kerry's speech.
Considering the speech was really good...
Chmee
Almost 1337
Almost 1337
Posts: 942
Joined: July 7, 2002, 11:13 pm

Post by Chmee »

Kelshara wrote:
Maybe they listened to Kerry's speech.
Considering the speech was really good...
That depends. I didn't get to hear the speech, but I read the transcript and my overall impression was negative. I wasn't that serious with my comment, but there may have been some effect. There have been some libertarian and conservitive pundits that had been looking towards voting for Kerry because of various dissatisfactions with Bush. Some of them expressed dissatisfaction with the speech. Whether or not this is enough to actually cause them to not vote for Kerry, and more importantly, if this view is shared by enough people out there to have any sort of impact on the election is questionable though. Still, for some people, and not just avid Bush supporters, I don't think the speech was a positive.
User avatar
Kelshara
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4176
Joined: November 18, 2002, 10:44 am
Location: Norway

Post by Kelshara »

Interesting. Most of the "undecided" I have talked to said the speech made them decide to vote FOR Kerry. Would be interesting to see some GOOD numbers on this but doubt that would be possible really.
User avatar
Kluden
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1827
Joined: November 13, 2002, 7:12 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Kluden »

That's the other problem...who are these people they poll? I have never been asked questions by these companies....I haven't even heard of someone being asked by them. Someone here maybe have an experiance with the gallop poll people??
User avatar
Xzion
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2567
Joined: September 22, 2002, 7:36 pm

Post by Xzion »

Ehh last poll i saw was like 49 to 42 or 43...the numbers will only continue shifting toward Kerry, i dont think the RNC will help Bush at all, hell with his ass speaking and evil racist motherfuckers like Zel Miller doing the same, it could even hurt Bush

Its also funny that half the RNC has liberal republican speakers like Ah-nuld and moderates like Guiliani, there too ashamed to show there true roots, where as the DNC showed the "heart and soul" of the democratic party...of course to show that there "fair and balanced" they'l be sporting ex-KKK grayn wizard Zel Miller
Last edited by Xzion on August 2, 2004, 11:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
-xzionis human mage on mannoroth
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
User avatar
Thess
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1036
Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:34 am
Location: Connecticut

Post by Thess »

I worked for a research/focus group company for a few years... basically for gallup polls you call the numbers on your list. Either a list your company bought, or a list provided by the company hiring you.
User avatar
Sylvus
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 7033
Joined: July 10, 2002, 11:10 am
Gender: Male
XBL Gamertag: mp72
Location: A², MI
Contact:

Post by Sylvus »

I was watching Real Time with Bill Maher this weekend and they mentioned that the people being polled are those people who participated in previous elections. I know there are a lot of folks are like me who have never voted before and have become motivated to vote this year. If a large enough number of people are like me, the current polls are completely meaningless.

I agree with the comment one of the panelists had about how before 9/11 it was cool to be apathetic and that now you get a lot more political discussion going on all over the country that you didn't get in the past. I still stand by my predicition that we'll see more people vote in this election than we have in the last 20 years.
"It's like these guys take pride in being ignorant." - Barack Obama

Go Blue!
User avatar
Kluden
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1827
Joined: November 13, 2002, 7:12 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Kluden »

With all these movies, and every other person screaming conspiracy...you're bound to get a lot more people involved in politics. Everyone loves conspiracy, its rumors and conjections that get people excited about politics, that's what amazes me (and scares me).
Voronwë
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 7176
Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:57 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Voronwë »

i definitely think the Democrats should be concerned about no boost from the Convention.

BUT, the sliver both groups are going for in the total pie of likely voters is a small one, and certainly there is an effort to get new people invovled in the voting process, and those people probably would skew a bit towards Kerry (my gut feeling, but i could be totally wrong).


interesting aside. The GOP is sending notices to some of its registered voters in Florida encouraging them to vote by absentee balloting because the Electronic Machines cannot be trusted to be accurate. Yes the same electronic machines that Republicans are protecting from having a paper voting record attachment retrofitted into (they are made like ATM machines by a company who makes ATM machines, printing receipts is something they know how to do.)

would you shop at a grocery store that refused to give you a receipt?
User avatar
Sirton
Star Farmer
Star Farmer
Posts: 474
Joined: July 31, 2002, 5:20 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Sirton »

CNN, GALLUP, USA TODAY.

Pretty intresting poll and something the Democrats can not just say look at newsweek...Gallup has been one of the premire polling agencys and CNN is involved aswell...Then you got Olympics coming up hogging the TV time and then the republican convention the aniversary of 9/11 which is normally a boost for Bush..Then the coverage now about terrorist plot found out about. I dont think you can be all smiles atm if supporting Kerry...my view is the race is still neck and neck, but Kerry is on the brink of faultering some overall.
User avatar
Xzion
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2567
Joined: September 22, 2002, 7:36 pm

Post by Xzion »

Sirton wrote:CNN, GALLUP, USA TODAY.

Pretty intresting poll and something the Democrats can not just say look at newsweek...Gallup has been one of the premire polling agencys and CNN is involved aswell...Then you got Olympics coming up hogging the TV time and then the republican convention the aniversary of 9/11 which is normally a boost for Bush..Then the coverage now about terrorist plot found out about. I dont think you can be all smiles atm if supporting Kerry...my view is the race is still neck and neck, but Kerry is on the brink of faultering some overall.
I dont know much about past elections but are these polls ever fairly/compleatly accurate compared to election day?

One thing i take in consideration, at least from my perspective is...i know a ton of people who voted for Bush four years ago that are now voting for Kerry, i know noone who voted for gore last year who is now voting for Bush
-xzionis human mage on mannoroth
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
User avatar
masteen
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 8197
Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:40 pm
Gender: Mangina
Location: Florida
Contact:

Post by masteen »

I think many voters are getting tired of hearing how Kerry isn't Bush. Thx info, now what do you stand for, Mr. Smith?
"There is at least as much need to curb the cruel greed and arrogance of part of the world of capital, to curb the cruel greed and violence of part of the world of labor, as to check a cruel and unhealthy militarism in international relationships." -Theodore Roosevelt
Chmee
Almost 1337
Almost 1337
Posts: 942
Joined: July 7, 2002, 11:13 pm

Post by Chmee »

masteen wrote:I think many voters are getting tired of hearing how Kerry isn't Bush. Thx info, now what do you stand for, Mr. Smith?
I think it is more likely the opposite. Hearing what he stands for,may remind voters that, while he thankfully isn't Bush, he isn't that great himself. A winning strategy for Kerry might be to retreat into a cave, come out once a week, hold a press conferance where he states "I am not George Bush!" and then goes back into the cave for another week.
No nation was ever ruined by trade.

– Benjamin Franklin
Voronwë
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 7176
Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:57 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Voronwë »

one more word from you and we go to Red ALert!!
User avatar
Pherr the Dorf
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2913
Joined: January 31, 2003, 9:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Sonoma County Calimifornia

Post by Pherr the Dorf »

Electoral college really does kill voter turnout, it's downright moronic when you think about it, I no more blame a Bush voter in California for not voting then a Dem in Texas, eliminate the college and voter turnout would rise in the neighborhood of 15-20%
The first duty of a patriot is to question the government

Jefferson
User avatar
Winnow
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 27727
Joined: July 5, 2002, 1:56 pm
Location: A Special Place in Hell

Post by Winnow »

Voronwë wrote:one more word from you and we go to Red ALert!!
I saw Voro shoot an arrow into the back of a fleeing froglok one day in Guk!
Voronwë
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 7176
Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:57 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Voronwë »

DID YOU ORDER A CODE RED?!!
User avatar
Winnow
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 27727
Joined: July 5, 2002, 1:56 pm
Location: A Special Place in Hell

Post by Winnow »

Voronwë wrote:DID YOU ORDER A CODE RED?!!
ImageImageImageImageImage :!:
User avatar
Cartalas
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4364
Joined: July 3, 2002, 2:39 pm
Location: Kyoukan's Mouth

Post by Cartalas »

Xzion wrote:
Sirton wrote:CNN, GALLUP, USA TODAY.

Pretty intresting poll and something the Democrats can not just say look at newsweek...Gallup has been one of the premire polling agencys and CNN is involved aswell...Then you got Olympics coming up hogging the TV time and then the republican convention the aniversary of 9/11 which is normally a boost for Bush..Then the coverage now about terrorist plot found out about. I dont think you can be all smiles atm if supporting Kerry...my view is the race is still neck and neck, but Kerry is on the brink of faultering some overall.
I dont know much about past elections but are these polls ever fairly/compleatly accurate compared to election day?

One thing i take in consideration, at least from my perspective is...i know a ton of people who voted for Bush four years ago that are now voting for Kerry, i know noone who voted for gore last year who is now voting for Bush

Here is one for ya Xzion a good old Democrat supporting Bush.

St. Paul Mayor Randy Kelly defiantly celebrated his 54th birthday on Monday by campaigning for President Bush's reelection while the fallout from his DFL ranks-busting endorsement began to pile up around him.

Leaders of St. Paul's Steamfitters Pipefitters Union, Local 455, which represents 1,250 members, withdrew its longtime support and insisted Kelly "is washed up in this town."

Former Police Chief Bill Finney, sounding in mid-campaign form for a 2005 mayoral challenge, wants everyone in heavily DFL St. Paul to know he's a Democrat and devout John Kerry supporter. Finney said a final decision on a mayoral run will come next month, but "it's a fair statement I'm giving it serious consideration.

"Randy is who he is, and people are starting to get a better picture," said Finney, a longtime Kelly adversary. "I love my city, and I just think it needs to be led well with a certainty and confidence. I think that person should be somebody who is going to get along with people rather than divide 'em."

As historians, political scientists and insiders wondered whether Kelly made a huge misstep in backing Bush, who won only one of St. Paul's 119 precincts in 2000, everyone agreed on one thing: Kelly is a shrewd political survivor.

And the birthday boy was all smiles one day after announcing that he was breaking ranks to back Bush. Go ahead, call it political suicide.

"I love it when people underestimate and make those kinds of predictions," said Kelly, sounding as though he'll seek a second term. "If you remember three years ago, people said ... 'nobody ... can follow in the footsteps of Norm Coleman. He's a rock star.' Quite honestly, the feedback I've gotten is I've done pretty well."

Kelly said he looks "forward to serving another four years. And I can assure you, if I choose to run, it will be with vigor, energy and the resources to get the message out."

Nothing like some new, well-to-do Republican friends to build the resources he'll need to take on a well-known charismatic rival such as Finney.

'Persona non grata'

Kelly is backing Bush because he says changing presidents "would confuse our friends and encourage our enemies."

Longtime University of Minnesota historian Hy Berman said time will tell whether Kelly's Bush endorsement was a miscalculation or a gutsy move.

"If Bush loses, Randy Kelly is relegated to the dust bin of history," Berman said. "If Bush wins, he'll have some obligations to meet."

When you sell your political soul in a battleground state, Berman and others say, it could lead to an appointment in the Bush administration or on Gov. Tim Pawlenty's team. That is, if Republicans maintain power.

Although Kelly says he'll remain a DFLer, Berman said his Bush endorsement "severs any connection the mayor has with the DFL Party.

"He might consider himself a DFLer, but with the kind of sharp hostilities in DFL circles around the Bush candidacy, that makes Randy Kelly a persona non grata," Berman said.

Kelly supporters say: So what? The last three DFL-endorsed mayoral candidates in St. Paul -- Andy Dawkins, Sandy Pappas and Jay Benanav -- all lost. And Coleman was easily reelected in '97 after switching to the Republican Party.

"The idea that St. Paul is one big DFL monolith is wrong," said Erich Mische, a key adviser to both Kelly and Coleman. "At the end of the day, the people in St. Paul care about whether you kept their taxes down, shoveled their streets and did what you said you'd do."

Kelly supporters point to his aggressive push for new housing and his budget management as issues that will matter more to voters in '05 than his support of Bush.

"Given the tough times we've had, he's run the city well financially and compared to other cities, we have a lot to shout about," said Lois West-Duffy, a longtime Ecolab executive, RiverCentre Authority leader and former aide to Republican U.S. Sen. Dave Durenberger. "Randy has demonstrated he's a risk-taker and people like that. He's made himself his own flak-catcher, but he can handle that."

There is plenty of flak to catch. U.S. Rep. Betty McCollum, a DFLer whose district includes all of St. Paul, said Kelly's "defection is hurtful to loyal Democrats who supported him in the past."

She downplayed its significance despite Minnesota's battleground status and predicted "the Kerry-Edwards ticket will win every precinct in St. Paul, leaving the Bush-Kelly team with a big zero."

Union backlash

Jerry Barnes, business manager of the St. Paul pipefitters union, said he recently made a verbal commitment to Deputy Mayor Dennis Flaherty for the apprentices in the union to make Kelly's reelection lawn signs.

"He just blew that," Barnes said. "In my personal opinion, he committed political suicide and left a lot of labor people who worked for him feeling cold and hard."

Pat Roedler, a 1970s City Council member and retired pipefitter, has been a longtime Kelly backer. Not anymore. "I just think he shot himself in both feet and he's washed up in this town," Roedler said.

As for those who say Kelly is simply borrowing a page from the Coleman playbook, Roedler said: "Let's be honest: Randy Kelly doesn't have Norm Coleman's charisma."

And Prof. Lilly Goren, a political scientist at the College of St. Catherine's, agrees.

"Norm Coleman and Randy Kelly have different personalities and characteristics, and Norm had a statewide run for governor in '98 to raise his profile," she said. "But Norm switched parties and went from being the mayor of St. Paul to a U.S. senator."

Whatever effect the endorsement will have on Kelly's future, Goren said the move is sure to enhance Minnesota's visibility in a close presidential race. Never mind that Minnesota hasn't chosen a Republican in a presidential race since 1972.

"When a Democratic mayor in one of the state's largest cities supports Bush, Republicans have to think it's a viable state to spend their time and money in," she said. "And that raises the profile of Kelly's endorsement."

"http://www.startribune.com/stories/587/4907839.html"
User avatar
Vetiria
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1226
Joined: July 3, 2002, 4:50 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Decatur, IL

Post by Vetiria »

Not a prominant democrat like the mayor of St. Paul? Say it ain't so!
User avatar
Cartalas
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4364
Joined: July 3, 2002, 2:39 pm
Location: Kyoukan's Mouth

Post by Cartalas »

Vetiria wrote:Not a prominant democrat like the mayor of St. Paul? Say it ain't so!
Sorry not all of us can live in the large metropolis of Decatur, IL Population 112,000.
User avatar
Siji
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4040
Joined: November 11, 2002, 5:58 pm
Gender: Male
XBL Gamertag: mAcK 624
PSN ID: mAcK_624
Wii Friend Code: 7304853446448491
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Contact:

Post by Siji »

Cartalas wrote:Sorry not all of us can live in the large metropolis of Decatur, IL Population 112,000.
Be nice.. if you've ever been to Decatur IL you'd understand.. fields of corn are the exciting parts..
Post Reply