Dubya action figure
Moderator: TheMachine
Dubya action figure
I tell it like a true mackadelic.
Founder of Ixtlan - the SCUM of Veeshan.
Founder of Ixtlan - the SCUM of Veeshan.
- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
- Fredonia Coldheart
- Gets Around
- Posts: 223
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 5:36 pm
- Location: Isabel's Path
- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
What's not to like?Xzion wrote:Shit I didnt realize people STILL SUPPORTED bush...
what the fuck could someone like about that assholes policys?
He gave me a tax cut last few years. I get more money back in my refund each year.
He stood up for our freedom and waged war against people who did harm to us and even freed a few million Iraqis under an evil dictator.
He gave seniors their prescription drug benefits.(It's a start)
He is helping our school systems with the no child left behind bill.(Also just a start, more needs to be done)
Most of all, he appears to be a passionate, patriotic leader who is in stark contrast to our last president.
But, beyond that...nothing I guess.
Maybe someday our world will degrade enough to the point we can have a leader who suits your desires. Maybe a pot smoking, MTV Cribs watching, anti-military, anti-space exploration, anti-family values, etc will ascend to our countries highest office. Gosh wouldn't that be swell? Then we could go back to worrying about being taken over and have enemies on our soil. WOOOT
- noel
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 10003
- Joined: August 22, 2002, 1:34 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Calabasas, CA
Going to have to agree with this portion of Mid's post. Well said! Of course, be glad Xzion is a perpetual loser. You and I will never be competing with him for a job.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Maybe a pot smoking, MTV Cribs watching, anti-military, anti-space exploration, anti-family values, etc will ascend to our countries highest office. Gosh wouldn't that be swell? Then we could go back to worrying about being taken over and have enemies on our soil. WOOOT
For the record, Xzion, when criticizing others (I have a lot of experience with this) it's best to attempt to form a coherent thought. Just a tip. Have a great day!
Oh, my God; I care so little, I almost passed out.
- Drolgin Steingrinder
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 3510
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 5:28 pm
- Gender: Male
- PSN ID: Drolgin
- Location: Århus, Denmark
- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
- Drolgin Steingrinder
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 3510
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 5:28 pm
- Gender: Male
- PSN ID: Drolgin
- Location: Århus, Denmark
Woah there. Do me a favor and explain exactly what you think your current president has done for 'family values' that's so great.
The reason I laugh is that usually anyone campaigning from the 'family values' platform is so firmly entrenched in the religious right as to be utterly xenophobic.
The reason I laugh is that usually anyone campaigning from the 'family values' platform is so firmly entrenched in the religious right as to be utterly xenophobic.
IT'S HARD TO PUT YOUR FINGER ON IT; SOMETHING IS WRONG
I'M LIKE THE UNCLE WHO HUGGED YOU A LITTLE TOO LONG
I'M LIKE THE UNCLE WHO HUGGED YOU A LITTLE TOO LONG
I'm not his biggest fan, but christ, instead of starting that shit about him, vote him out of office...
He may have lost the popular vote, but that's not what our electoral process is based on...
I believe in the freedom of speech and expression, but I also believe that most of our country's problems with the political process are because the dissenters don't support a damn thing the opposing winner does for their term in ofice and the campaign processes end up taking 18 months of a President's 48 month term.
Don't love the guy, but let him do his job and vote him out next election.
He may have lost the popular vote, but that's not what our electoral process is based on...
I believe in the freedom of speech and expression, but I also believe that most of our country's problems with the political process are because the dissenters don't support a damn thing the opposing winner does for their term in ofice and the campaign processes end up taking 18 months of a President's 48 month term.
Don't love the guy, but let him do his job and vote him out next election.
- noel
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 10003
- Joined: August 22, 2002, 1:34 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Calabasas, CA
I think they both suck ass.
I'll add that I don't think there's been a truly great President in my lifetime.
I did really like the way Bush conducted himself just following the events of 9/11, but that's about it. I firmly believe that having Al Gore as President during that event would have been a bad thing.
I'll add that I don't think there's been a truly great President in my lifetime.
I did really like the way Bush conducted himself just following the events of 9/11, but that's about it. I firmly believe that having Al Gore as President during that event would have been a bad thing.
Last edited by noel on February 23, 2004, 6:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Oh, my God; I care so little, I almost passed out.
I question what you mean by associating family values/religious right with being xenophobic...Drolgin Steingrinder wrote:Woah there. Do me a favor and explain exactly what you think your current president has done for 'family values' that's so great.
The reason I laugh is that usually anyone campaigning from the 'family values' platform is so firmly entrenched in the religious right as to be utterly xenophobic.
Maybe I'm missing the boat here, but what does one have to do with another?
As far as xenophobia goes, if the world didn't hate America so much already, we'd have little reason or justification for being xenophobic... The greatest defense for that ideology is a 2 square block hole in lower Manhattan.
- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
Aye. I firmly believe in good family values, but am not a big religion guy. In fact, I dream for a day when the people of the world can live together without the need for religion. A pipe dream me thinks though.Pahreyia wrote:I question what you mean by associating family values/religious right with being xenophobic...Drolgin Steingrinder wrote:Woah there. Do me a favor and explain exactly what you think your current president has done for 'family values' that's so great.
The reason I laugh is that usually anyone campaigning from the 'family values' platform is so firmly entrenched in the religious right as to be utterly xenophobic.
Maybe I'm missing the boat here, but what does one have to do with another?
As far as xenophobia goes, if the world didn't hate America so much already, we'd have little reason or justification for being xenophobic... The greatest defense for that ideology is a 2 square block hole in lower Manhattan.
- Drolgin Steingrinder
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 3510
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 5:28 pm
- Gender: Male
- PSN ID: Drolgin
- Location: Århus, Denmark
I'm talking about 10 years ago, for instance. Remember Buchanan and Robertson at the Republican national convention? Remember good ole Dan Quayle bitching about Murphy Brown (of all things) for "glorifying" single motherhood to the youth of America.
The paranoia of the "family values" crowd - the same crowd, I might add, who so vehemently oppose the idea of same-sex marriages - seems based on a fear of change, a fear of anything that is different.
I've yet to see an american politician campaigning from that platform who spoke to peoples hopes rather than their fears of the unknown, of change.
The paranoia of the "family values" crowd - the same crowd, I might add, who so vehemently oppose the idea of same-sex marriages - seems based on a fear of change, a fear of anything that is different.
I've yet to see an american politician campaigning from that platform who spoke to peoples hopes rather than their fears of the unknown, of change.
IT'S HARD TO PUT YOUR FINGER ON IT; SOMETHING IS WRONG
I'M LIKE THE UNCLE WHO HUGGED YOU A LITTLE TOO LONG
I'M LIKE THE UNCLE WHO HUGGED YOU A LITTLE TOO LONG
For the record Aranuil, i have a higher income right now then you probably ever will.Aranuil wrote:Going to have to agree with this portion of Mid's post. Well said! Of course, be glad Xzion is a perpetual loser. You and I will never be competing with him for a job.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Maybe a pot smoking, MTV Cribs watching, anti-military, anti-space exploration, anti-family values, etc will ascend to our countries highest office. Gosh wouldn't that be swell? Then we could go back to worrying about being taken over and have enemies on our soil. WOOOT
For the record, Xzion, when criticizing others (I have a lot of experience with this) it's best to attempt to form a coherent thought. Just a tip. Have a great day!
but honestly, who gives a fuck? You make enough assumptions of who i am based on a few paragraphs that take me a good 15-45 seconds to compose
Last edited by Xzion on February 23, 2004, 7:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-xzionis human mage on mannoroth
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
First off I agree, I'd like to see more positive from politicians when they campaign.Drolgin Steingrinder wrote:I'm talking about 10 years ago, for instance. Remember Buchanan and Robertson at the Republican national convention? Remember good ole Dan Quayle bitching about Murphy Brown (of all things) for "glorifying" single motherhood to the youth of America.
The paranoia of the "family values" crowd - the same crowd, I might add, who so vehemently oppose the idea of same-sex marriages - seems based on a fear of change, a fear of anything that is different.
I've yet to see an american politician campaigning from that platform who spoke to peoples hopes rather than their fears of the unknown, of change.
Secondly, I think there is enough evidence already that shows that single parent kids "can" get into more trouble, have more behaviorial problems, etc.
- Drolgin Steingrinder
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 3510
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 5:28 pm
- Gender: Male
- PSN ID: Drolgin
- Location: Århus, Denmark
Midnyte hit the mark on this one.Drolgin Steingrinder wrote:I'm talking about 10 years ago, for instance. Remember Buchanan and Robertson at the Republican national convention? Remember good ole Dan Quayle bitching about Murphy Brown (of all things) for "glorifying" single motherhood to the youth of America.
I don't know that I'd go as far as to say that the "family values" crowd is so much responsible for the opposition of same sex marriages as is the religious right. The fact that they're often complimenting traits of one another, I wouldn't limit family values people to just the right. Plenty of free-thinkers and leftists have campaigned under a family values platform as well.The paranoia of the "family values" crowd - the same crowd, I might add, who so vehemently oppose the idea of same-sex marriages - seems based on a fear of change, a fear of anything that is different.
God, wouldn't that be nice. Find me a 3rd party candidate that can speak intelligently and eloquently from this platform with half a clue how to balance a budget and a lick of common sense and they'll have my vote in a heartbeat.I've yet to see an american politician campaigning from that platform who spoke to peoples hopes rather than their fears of the unknown, of change.
- Lalanae
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 3309
- Joined: September 25, 2002, 11:21 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Only the simple-minded equate having children with moral rightness and maturity. If you like children, good for you. Just don't assume it makes you a better person or citizen.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Have children dipshit. It's funny to you now because you obviously don't live your life for your children. Grow up or even at least try to think like one for a second.Drolgin Steingrinder wrote:anti-family values
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
Lalanae
Burundi High Chancellor for Tourism, Sodomy and Pie
Unofficial Canadian, Forbidden Lover of Pie, Jesus-Hatin'' Sodomite, President of KFC (Kyoukan Fan Club), hawt, perververted, intellectual submissive with E.S.P (Extra Sexual Persuasion)
Burundi High Chancellor for Tourism, Sodomy and Pie
Unofficial Canadian, Forbidden Lover of Pie, Jesus-Hatin'' Sodomite, President of KFC (Kyoukan Fan Club), hawt, perververted, intellectual submissive with E.S.P (Extra Sexual Persuasion)
- Dregor Thule
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 8:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Xathlak
- PSN ID: dregor77
- Location: Oakville, Ontario
- noel
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 10003
- Joined: August 22, 2002, 1:34 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Calabasas, CA
I don't believe you.Xzion wrote:For the record Aranuil, i have a higher income right now then you probably ever will.
but honestly, who gives a fuck? You make enough assumptions of who i am based on a few paragraphs that take me a good 15-45 seconds to compose
For the record, I think it's precious that you're so insecure about yourself you had to tell me you make more money than me (which I still doubt).
Oh, my God; I care so little, I almost passed out.
- Pherr the Dorf
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 2913
- Joined: January 31, 2003, 9:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sonoma County Calimifornia
Just so I can say I said it. Remember that Bush's white house leaked a CIA agent's identity, and that this greatly pissed off the Agency. Last President to piss off the Agency to such a degree was Nixon, and if you think they had nothing to do with Watergate you are naive
The first duty of a patriot is to question the government
Jefferson
Jefferson
- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
??? Only you could pull that from what I said. Having children will make one appreciate the need for family values. That's it, nothign more to it.Lalanae wrote:Only the simple-minded equate having children with moral rightness and maturity. If you like children, good for you. Just don't assume it makes you a better person or citizen.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Have children dipshit. It's funny to you now because you obviously don't live your life for your children. Grow up or even at least try to think like one for a second.Drolgin Steingrinder wrote:anti-family values
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
http://www.healthscout.com/news/68/8005301/main.htmlBrittney wrote:Lol what a load of shitMidnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Secondly, I think there is enough evidence already that shows that single parent kids "can" get into more trouble, have more behaviorial problems, etc.
http://patriot.net/~crouch/adc/jds.html
I'm sure I could find plenty more, but I want to spend my time playing EQ not finding references of obviousness for the monumentaly dumb and ignorant.
HAHAHAHAHA, you call me insecure when you make this post:?Aranuil wrote:Going to have to agree with this portion of Mid's post. Well said! Of course, be glad Xzion is a perpetual loser. You and I will never be competing with him for a job.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Maybe a pot smoking, MTV Cribs watching, anti-military, anti-space exploration, anti-family values, etc will ascend to our countries highest office. Gosh wouldn't that be swell? Then we could go back to worrying about being taken over and have enemies on our soil. WOOOT
For the record, Xzion, when criticizing others (I have a lot of experience with this) it's best to attempt to form a coherent thought. Just a tip. Have a great day!
Godamn dude you are the Epitome of a hypocrite.
Notice that there would have been no reason to boast about my economic backround if you didnt call me a perpetual loser, or are you that much of a one sideded dumbfuck
Last edited by Xzion on February 24, 2004, 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
-xzionis human mage on mannoroth
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
- Brittney
- Star Farmer
- Posts: 403
- Joined: July 7, 2002, 10:05 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Compton
- Contact:
Dude you can find studies to support any argument on the fuckin internet, that don’t mean shit. And if you would rather spend your time playing EQ then sitting here spouting off your crackhead ideals and telling people how they should live then please fuckin do it and kindly stfu.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:http://www.healthscout.com/news/68/8005301/main.htmlBrittney wrote:Lol what a load of shitMidnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Secondly, I think there is enough evidence already that shows that single parent kids "can" get into more trouble, have more behaviorial problems, etc.
http://patriot.net/~crouch/adc/jds.html
I'm sure I could find plenty more, but I want to spend my time playing EQ not finding references of obviousness for the monumentaly dumb and ignorant.

blanket statements such as this really bother me. loving and protecting your kid is what you're supposed to do. it doesn't magically make you more enlightened than the rest of the world. when you post something like this, it sounds more like you're arguing against change than arguing to support your beliefs. plus you're insulting probably more than half the board by implying they don't love and value their families as much as you do, just because they might be the child, brother, sister, uncle, friend, etc. in their own personal scenarios, rather than the parent.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Having children will make one appreciate the need for family values. That's it, nothign more to it.
most people do have family values; whether or not they coincide with yours is another issue.
- Arundel Pajo
- Almost 1337
- Posts: 660
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:53 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: concreteeye
- Location: Austin Texas
Can't really debate that. If you got more cash back, more power to you. I didn't. I also was super-chaffed about having a "tax relief for the American Worker" check that later was deducted from my return. Not to mention the push to cut overtime pay for a large percentage of the population.Midnyte wrote:He gave me a tax cut last few years. I get more money back in my refund each year.
Yes, and I will agree that Saddam is Bad™ and all, but I still feel lied to for his motivations. If he had been forthwith and simply said, "hey, we've dealt with this jackass long enough, and these people have suffered long enough under our sanctions, let's just end this right now," then he likely would have had more supporters.Midnyte wrote:He stood up for our freedom and waged war against people who did harm to us and even freed a few million Iraqis under an evil dictator.
But he didn't.
Instead we got stockpiles of WMD's (which we claimed to have photos of and know *exactly* where they were), the ability to launch an assault on Great Britain in 45 minutes or less, attempts to purchase yellowcake from Nigeria, and tons of stockpiled biological and chemical weaponry. Turns out that this was all a sham, and that somebody fairly high up was aware that it was a sham. I don't know about you, but I do feel lied to, and this lie is fuck all more serious than getting a hummer in office. Even if Bush didn't know personally, that leaves one other option - that he's a tool. I don't know which of these options leaves the worse taste in my mouth.
Look deeper into these issues. Ask some doctors and pharmacists, or even health insurace agents about that medicaid prescription plan. Ask some teachers or eductaion administrators about the "no child left behind program."Midnyte wrote:He gave seniors their prescription drug benefits.(It's a start)
He is helping our school systems with the no child left behind bill.(Also just a start, more needs to be done)
"No child left behind" is bankrupting our public schools in several states. This is not just the fault of bad teachers, either. Look at it like this: If you take a state school system, with its rich districts and poor districts, its high-scoring schools and low-scoring, and then you tell them to all be up to a certain standard, or you're cutting funding, what do you think will happen? The rich districts will pass, and the poor ones, the ones that were doing badly anyway due to a dire lack of funding don't. Cut their funding, and how do you possibly expect them to do better?
I agree the answer is not to merely throw money at the problem, but Bush's plan is less an actual plan of action as it is a way to effectively *cut* money from education while still appearing to be "pro-education."
This has also led what appears to many to be a potential increase in student ignorance. Teachers now are doing what is known as "teaching the test," that is they only teach students materials to help them pass the requirements tests. Teachers are absolutely paranoid about having children fail these tests, because if the school loses money because of them, it will affect *their* jobs....and you really can't always control how well a kid does. The family has to bear some responsibility here somewhere, too.
The whole education thing is seriously fucked up, and Bush did nothing to really help. In fact, he short-changed the schools that *did* pass standards by a substantial amount, and has pledged that if he is re-elected (as part of his budget plan) to hold education to 5% growth over the next term. 5% seems fair, right? Inflation is 2% a year, so a net growth of 5% spread over 4 years comes out to 3% less than inflation - a net *cut* in education dollars.
The medicaid situation is quite similar. It's a quagmire that he just made worse. The really bad thing is that if you stand against it, then you clearly "don't care about the seniors."
I like your use of the word "appears." The one credit that I will give willingly to Bush is the fact that he has played his image and the media better than any president ever has in history. His team has a *very* keen understanding of framing and image. Every photo of Bush you will ever see is as carefully choreographed as a Superbowl breast-grab. From the lighting to the camera distance and angles, to the plastic turkey he's serving, to the color of shirts the people in the background are wearing, it's all staged - and it's staged brilliantly. His team has had people in the crown remove their ties and rumple their hair in order to look more like the average american, they have furnished people with jackets that would match the color scheme they were shooting for, they have set barges around the statue of liberty equipped with stadium lights so that they could get a stark image of Bush and the statue together at night. They have hung "mission accomplished" banners prematurely on aircraft carriers. Now, to be sure, I don't think all of this is bad - the man knows how to play image....just be aware that you are being played.Midnyte wrote:Most of all, he appears to be a passionate, patriotic leader who is in stark contrast to our last president.
As far as Bush being particularly patriotic....well, I would imagine the term "nationalistic" to fit a bit better.
I'm not quite sure how I feel about the insinuation both here and in another threat that patriotism is somehow linked to unflagging support of the military and rash military actions.Midnyte wrote:Maybe someday our world will degrade enough to the point we can have a leader who suits your desires. Maybe a pot smoking, MTV Cribs watching, anti-military, anti-space exploration, anti-family values, etc will ascend to our countries highest office. Gosh wouldn't that be swell? Then we could go back to worrying about being taken over and have enemies on our soil. WOOOT
Hawking - 80 Necromancer, AOC Mannannan server, TELoE
Also currently enjoying Left 4 Dead on XBL.
Also currently enjoying Left 4 Dead on XBL.

- Arundel Pajo
- Almost 1337
- Posts: 660
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:53 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: concreteeye
- Location: Austin Texas
erm....Bush hasn't exactly done anything to prevent globalism, has he? Anything I might not be aware of?Aruman wrote:Yeah, NAFTA has done wonders for the economy...Xyun wrote:he is also a bumbling fucking retard in contrast to our last president.Most of all, he appears to be a passionate, patriotic leader who is in stark contrast to our last president.
Hawking - 80 Necromancer, AOC Mannannan server, TELoE
Also currently enjoying Left 4 Dead on XBL.
Also currently enjoying Left 4 Dead on XBL.

- Pherr the Dorf
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 2913
- Joined: January 31, 2003, 9:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sonoma County Calimifornia
NAFTA showed Clinton was more republican then any republican would admit to
Tax and spend (massive deficit spending) says Bush is far more like old school demos then any demo would admit
The difference is the deficit will be Bush's achilles heel
His Waterloo should come out in say... july or august
Tax and spend (massive deficit spending) says Bush is far more like old school demos then any demo would admit
The difference is the deficit will be Bush's achilles heel
His Waterloo should come out in say... july or august
Last edited by Pherr the Dorf on February 24, 2004, 12:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
The first duty of a patriot is to question the government
Jefferson
Jefferson
- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
No, you making a whole arguement by pulling a load of shit from a small simple statement bothers me.Sunserae wrote:blanket statements such as this really bother me. loving and protecting your kid is what you're supposed to do. it doesn't magically make you more enlightened than the rest of the world. when you post something like this, it sounds more like you're arguing against change than arguing to support your beliefs. plus you're insulting probably more than half the board by implying they don't love and value their families as much as you do, just because they might be the child, brother, sister, uncle, friend, etc. in their own personal scenarios, rather than the parent.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Having children will make one appreciate the need for family values. That's it, nothign more to it.
most people do have family values; whether or not they coincide with yours is another issue.
I never said some people don't have family values. But, when some jackhole laughs at the very notion of the importance of family values, then I shall repeat my prior statement.
- Arundel Pajo
- Almost 1337
- Posts: 660
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:53 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: concreteeye
- Location: Austin Texas
I agree with this to a degree. Being a parent changes things. I'm not one, myself, but I see enough of it in friends. You have a kid, and the values that you impart to that kid become a very high priority. Still, legislating those values is a very dangerous game, in my opinion, which is why I loathe with ever fiber of my being the GOP values platform.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:No, you making a whole arguement by pulling a load of shit from a small simple statement bothers me.Sunserae wrote:blanket statements such as this really bother me. loving and protecting your kid is what you're supposed to do. it doesn't magically make you more enlightened than the rest of the world. when you post something like this, it sounds more like you're arguing against change than arguing to support your beliefs. plus you're insulting probably more than half the board by implying they don't love and value their families as much as you do, just because they might be the child, brother, sister, uncle, friend, etc. in their own personal scenarios, rather than the parent.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Having children will make one appreciate the need for family values. That's it, nothign more to it.
most people do have family values; whether or not they coincide with yours is another issue.
I never said some people don't have family values. But, when some jackhole laughs at the very notion of the importance of family values, then I shall repeat my prior statement.
...despite the fact that it just smacks of political insincerity...
Hawking - 80 Necromancer, AOC Mannannan server, TELoE
Also currently enjoying Left 4 Dead on XBL.
Also currently enjoying Left 4 Dead on XBL.

- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
Brittney wrote:Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:http://www.healthscout.com/news/68/8005301/main.htmlBrittney wrote:Lol what a load of shitMidnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Secondly, I think there is enough evidence already that shows that single parent kids "can" get into more trouble, have more behaviorial problems, etc.
http://patriot.net/~crouch/adc/jds.html
I'm sure I could find plenty more, but I want to spend my time playing EQ not finding references of obviousness for the monumentaly dumb and ignorant.
Dude you can find studies to support any argument on the fuckin internet, that don’t mean shit. And if you would rather spend your time playing EQ then sitting here spouting off your crackhead ideals and telling people how they should live then please fuckin do it and kindly stfu.
Wow. Well said. You sure are a great contributor to conversation on a topic.
- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
Aye, sometimes it does seem insincere for sure. I don't want the government to legislate family values. I just really find it comforting and admirable when the people up top who have so much influence recognize it's importance.Arundel Pajo wrote:I agree with this to a degree. Being a parent changes things. I'm not one, myself, but I see enough of it in friends. You have a kid, and the values that you impart to that kid become a very high priority. Still, legislating those values is a very dangerous game, in my opinion, which is why I loathe with ever fiber of my being the GOP values platform.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:No, you making a whole arguement by pulling a load of shit from a small simple statement bothers me.Sunserae wrote:blanket statements such as this really bother me. loving and protecting your kid is what you're supposed to do. it doesn't magically make you more enlightened than the rest of the world. when you post something like this, it sounds more like you're arguing against change than arguing to support your beliefs. plus you're insulting probably more than half the board by implying they don't love and value their families as much as you do, just because they might be the child, brother, sister, uncle, friend, etc. in their own personal scenarios, rather than the parent.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Having children will make one appreciate the need for family values. That's it, nothign more to it.
most people do have family values; whether or not they coincide with yours is another issue.
I never said some people don't have family values. But, when some jackhole laughs at the very notion of the importance of family values, then I shall repeat my prior statement.
...despite the fact that it just smacks of political insincerity...
Family is the greatest natural resource on earth. Not every one has a great family unit and that sucks. Maybe it's the Italian in me or something, but family has kept me from taking advantage of some really great financial opportunities outside the state, etc...but I wouldn't trade money for my family, ever. I see family as a good thing for society. The loyalty, the bonds, the love....they are just the things that money can't buy, that nothing can tear apart, that breeds a person who exudes those traits I seek in a leader.
I bet his daughters really appreciate him when he lets them run around in every fucking bar in DC boozing it up while still underage.Drolgin Steingrinder wrote:Woah there. Do me a favor and explain exactly what you think your current president has done for 'family values' that's so great.
Gore would have made such a fantastic president. And a democratically elected one too. Fortunately Kerry looks like he's going to bounce him out of office because I can't see anyone outside the collosally stupid fucking morons like midnyte ever voting for such a boob. Granted the US has no shortage of collosal fucking morons.
no child left behind, lol. yeah that's really helping your education system out.
Last edited by kyoukan on February 24, 2004, 7:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Brittney
- Star Farmer
- Posts: 403
- Joined: July 7, 2002, 10:05 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Compton
- Contact:
My intentions in this thread were never to go spouting off my political beliefs or to go telling people how I think they should live their lives. The only thing I ever set out to do in this thread was to point out how full of shit you were and wonder just how you got so fuckin out of touch with reality where you would actually believe the shit you spout.Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Brittney wrote:Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:http://www.healthscout.com/news/68/8005301/main.htmlBrittney wrote:Lol what a load of shitMidnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Secondly, I think there is enough evidence already that shows that single parent kids "can" get into more trouble, have more behaviorial problems, etc.
http://patriot.net/~crouch/adc/jds.html
I'm sure I could find plenty more, but I want to spend my time playing EQ not finding references of obviousness for the monumentaly dumb and ignorant.
Dude you can find studies to support any argument on the fuckin internet, that don’t mean shit. And if you would rather spend your time playing EQ then sitting here spouting off your crackhead ideals and telling people how they should live then please fuckin do it and kindly stfu.
Wow. Well said. You sure are a great contributor to conversation on a topic.
You sit here and preach your views like you are some sort of high and mighty parent trying to teach their children that what you think is right because of your superior morals. You say some really offensive fucking shit dude and then you expect not to get fuckin called out when your bullshit gets so thick you can hardly walk by without fainting from the stench? Give me a mother fucking break. I for one call em as I see em and you sir are an arrogant self-righteous little bitch. Here, take these 50 Veeshan Vault credits I’m gunna give you and buy a ticket to the lala land you fuckin live in and never come back. In fact while you are there see if you can find your power animal, maybe if you beg for a while it will beat some sense into that empty fuckin skull of yours.
I would go into more depth as to why you are such a retard but I think I would rather just play some EQ.

Well, im probaby gonna get flamed for this (always flames when talking politics), but heres my view on Bush as a non-american:
Good things:
He didnt nuke the middle east after 9/11 (Reagan would have)
Bad things:
Restarted development of mini nukes.
Started a war on false premises (although in the sense of fairness, Denmark is not much better, we were one of the first countries to support the war, sending our totally usefull submarine over to help in a desert war. And for the record, NO, i did not vote for the moron leading my country at the moment either
).
Declared war over although he loose people daily.
SKipped the Kyoto environmental agreement that 108 countries, INCLUDING USA had signet at first, that way making sure US factories can pollute as much as they want (can you say lobbysts anyone).
Setting up war criminal camp that break the constitution, and several international laws.
Imprisoning non-US citizens in said war criminal camps for up to 18 months without trial.
Failed to know that Africa is a continent.
Good things:
He didnt nuke the middle east after 9/11 (Reagan would have)
Bad things:
Restarted development of mini nukes.
Started a war on false premises (although in the sense of fairness, Denmark is not much better, we were one of the first countries to support the war, sending our totally usefull submarine over to help in a desert war. And for the record, NO, i did not vote for the moron leading my country at the moment either

Declared war over although he loose people daily.
SKipped the Kyoto environmental agreement that 108 countries, INCLUDING USA had signet at first, that way making sure US factories can pollute as much as they want (can you say lobbysts anyone).
Setting up war criminal camp that break the constitution, and several international laws.
Imprisoning non-US citizens in said war criminal camps for up to 18 months without trial.
Failed to know that Africa is a continent.
"Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich"
- Drolgin Steingrinder
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 3510
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 5:28 pm
- Gender: Male
- PSN ID: Drolgin
- Location: Århus, Denmark
- Drolgin Steingrinder
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 3510
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 5:28 pm
- Gender: Male
- PSN ID: Drolgin
- Location: Århus, Denmark
You're so dense it's gone past sad, past so-sad-that-it's-funny, past so-sad-that-it's-ceased-to-be-funny-and-become-sad-again.Midnyte wrote:But, when some jackhole laughs at the very notion of the importance of family values, then I shall repeat my prior statement.
I could post here how I laughed, not at the notion that family values are important but at the idea that legislating your way to some misunderstood-1950s idea of a nuclear family is the best way to go about things, but I doubt you'd understand it. And I really don't want to be called a jackhole or a dipshit again, it shatters my fragile ego.
IT'S HARD TO PUT YOUR FINGER ON IT; SOMETHING IS WRONG
I'M LIKE THE UNCLE WHO HUGGED YOU A LITTLE TOO LONG
I'M LIKE THE UNCLE WHO HUGGED YOU A LITTLE TOO LONG