Did you guys hear about the Egyptians suing all the jews?

Krimson Klaw · Post by **Krimson Klaw** » August 27, 2003, 6:13 pm

I am not kidding, first got wind of this a few days ago. Egyptians are suing all of the jews of the world for riches stolen during the legendary exodus mentioned in the bible. They are suing for trillions of tons of gold and lewtz. Not kidding.
http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?P ... ID=SP55603

The Egyptian Pharaoh was surprised one day to discover thousands of Egyptian women crying under the palace balcony, asking for help and complaining that the Jews stole their clothing and jewels, in the greatest collective fraud history has ever known.

ROFL! I understand their motive is a tit for tat at the jews, but damn if they did not drive home their point pretty dang good.

masteen · Post by **masteen** » August 27, 2003, 6:24 pm

That's fucking hilarious. Let's see Israel make good on that debt.

Voronwë · Post by **Voronwë** » August 27, 2003, 6:30 pm

this guy is crazy , but i'm amused

carry on!

Forthe · Post by **Forthe** » August 27, 2003, 6:33 pm

rofl that was funny.

"There may be a compromise solution. The debt can be rescheduled over 1,000 years, with the addition of the cumulative interest during that period."

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » August 27, 2003, 7:09 pm

it's not really "the egyptians" it's just one guy. he's probably just looking for some media time to spread his anti-semitism.

Chidoro · Post by **Chidoro** » August 27, 2003, 9:47 pm

How about we take the years and years of bondage into account and call it even.

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » August 27, 2003, 10:00 pm

nah, the slaves were just born, after the intitial fight they just got them for free

Marbus · Post by **Marbus** » August 27, 2003, 10:15 pm

LOL, that rocks!

Chidoro · Post by **Chidoro** » August 27, 2003, 10:24 pm

Well, this certainly makes it easy to classify the anti-semites around here

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » August 27, 2003, 11:12 pm

Eh not sure how that would classify anyone as anti-semites whatsoever.

Chidoro · Post by **Chidoro** » August 27, 2003, 11:53 pm

Don't recall asking for your approval

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » August 27, 2003, 11:55 pm

Chidoro wrote:Well, this certainly makes it easy to classify the anti-semites around here

don't be so sensitive.

what is it with you damn jews anyway? (joke)
sorta

Wulfran · Post by **Wulfran** » August 28, 2003, 12:15 am

Hilmi: "Taking posession of the gold was understandable. This is clear theft of a host country's resources and treasure, something that fits the morals and character of the Jews. Yet what was not clear to the Egyptian women were the reasons for stealing the cooking utensils, when other things may have been of greater value. However, one of the Egyptian priets said that this had been the Jews' twisted way throughout history; they seek to cause a minor problem connected with the needs of everyday life so as to occupy people with these matters and prevent them from pursuing them to get back the stolen gold...

OK I admit I read it and laughed my ass off. I am very interested where they got "police reports" that are a couple thousand years old, detailing what was "stolen".

As far as the the Jews being owed for "the years of bondage", I guess that would depend on who started their fight in the first place: were the agressors Egyptian or Hebrew?

Thanks for the laughs

Hammerstalker PE · Post by **Hammerstalker PE** » August 28, 2003, 1:19 am

I laughed at this one also. Next thing we will have the British sueing the Italians for the same thing.

Truant · Post by **Truant** » August 28, 2003, 3:50 am

Sorry but that was fucking funny.

If finding that funny makes you an anti semite...then you can all eat my ass.

Krimson Klaw · Post by **Krimson Klaw** » August 28, 2003, 8:07 am

No way does finding that funny make you anti-anything.

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » August 28, 2003, 8:08 am

Don't recall asking for your approval

Don't recall me (or anyone else probably) giving a shit about you or your feelings?

Chidoro · Post by **Chidoro** » August 28, 2003, 10:48 am

Then don't reply. Simple concept.

masteen · Post by **masteen** » August 28, 2003, 11:17 am

Chidoro wrote:Then don't reply. Simple concept.

I think you should eat Truant's ass.

Post by **Sylvus** » August 28, 2003, 11:49 am

I think the Jews should have to pay it. But they should pay it back with the reparation money they should demand of the Egyptians for enslaving them in the first place. Or, on second thought, they could just both call it even.

Note: My knowledge of the Jews being enslaved by the Egyptians comes from the Bible, so there's a good chance it's not historically accurate.

Akaran_D · Post by **Akaran_D** » August 28, 2003, 11:53 am

And the Indians sueing the Americans.. or the nords sueing the english, because damnit, they discovered America first... or the jews sueing the Germans (tho I think they allready did? Don't recall exactly).

List could go on and on.. the French sueing all of Europe because they didn't bow down and surrender to Napolean. :0

Forthe · Post by **Forthe** » August 28, 2003, 1:03 pm

Akaran_D wrote:And the Indians sueing the Americans.. or the nords sueing the english, because damnit, they discovered America first... or the jews sueing the Germans (tho I think they allready did? Don't recall exactly).

List could go on and on.. the French sueing all of Europe because they didn't bow down and surrender to Napolean. :0

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3181517.stm

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » August 28, 2003, 5:35 pm

We need tougher religious types to enforce these claims.

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » August 28, 2003, 5:40 pm

Forthe wrote:
Akaran_D wrote:And the Indians sueing the Americans.. or the nords sueing the english, because damnit, they discovered America first... or the jews sueing the Germans (tho I think they allready did? Don't recall exactly).

List could go on and on.. the French sueing all of Europe because they didn't bow down and surrender to Napolean. :0
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3181517.stm

ehh the english never claimed the discovered america, they didnt by any means
...stupid brits

Truant · Post by **Truant** » August 28, 2003, 5:43 pm

Winnow wrote:We need tougher religious types to enforce these claims.

NUKE 'EM FOR JESUS! YEEEEEEHAW

Boogahz · Post by **Boogahz** » August 29, 2003, 12:47 am

I am sure they can just deduct it all from the items stolen and stowed away by the Nazi's in WWII. Like any of THAT will ever be found.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » August 29, 2003, 6:43 am

I think you'd be hard pressed to find more than a handful of egyptian nazis.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » August 29, 2003, 9:15 am

Akaran_D wrote:And the Indians sueing the Americans.. or the nords sueing the english, because damnit, they discovered America first...

Let me say this once more, THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT "DISCOVERED" AMERICA WERE THE AMERICAN INDIANS. The people that came in afterwards were nothing more than invaders. That will be all.

Akaran_D · Post by **Akaran_D** » August 29, 2003, 10:13 am

Actually I've a question about that.
I know that it's commonly thought that the american indians came across durring the land bridge in the ice age.. were they the same people (with a few hundred generations removed) that settled down around where the Incans and Mayans duked it out?

masteen · Post by **masteen** » August 29, 2003, 12:23 pm

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:
Akaran_D wrote:And the Indians sueing the Americans.. or the nords sueing the english, because damnit, they discovered America first...
Let me say this once more, THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT "DISCOVERED" AMERICA WERE THE AMERICAN INDIANS. The people that came in afterwards were nothing more than invaders. That will be all.

Nekkid savages don't count.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » August 29, 2003, 3:58 pm

Die Masteen!

Akaran, I don't think anyone would ever be able to prove exactly who came from where, but it is thought that most of those in that area all were descendants of the same people. The Mexicans and what would be Native Americans now all probably originated from the same area and had common ancestors.

Truant · Post by **Truant** » August 29, 2003, 6:56 pm

on the offtopic topic of native americans and the origins of their coming to the americas.

There is no textbook factual method of course.

There are several theories...and OMGIAMRETARDEDCAUSEALOTISTWOWORDS are starting to believe it was a combination of these theories.

1. Wandering nomad hunters walked across the land bridge in pursuit of the tasty but elusive Wooly Mammoth. Most people believe this one to be most plausible, though I don't personally, because of one thing: The landbridge existed during the ice age. I doubt a massive amount of people (though I will admit some did) walked this bridge because.......IT WAS TOO FUCKING COLD!
2. Seafaring Island types traveled together across the pacific currents. (archaelogical evidence shows certain types of pottery and jewlery found in the islands also in certain places on the west coast of SA, some even theorize that traders travelled this passage)

These are the two most non crazy. One very odd thing was that the Olmec tribe in SA seems very out of place. Skeletons from this entire tribe show characteristics of negro descent, whereas the rest of the american indians share asian characteristics. There is basically no way to explain how these people arrived in america except to say that they journeyed across the atlantic. Which isn't out of the question.

rambleramble

Drasta · Post by **Drasta** » August 29, 2003, 7:10 pm

but you can debate that the bible / religious texts are totally fake ... but i would love to see religious leaders say no that didn't haapen

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » August 29, 2003, 8:39 pm

Drasta wrote:but you can debate that the bible / religious texts are totally fake ... but i would love to see religious leaders say no that didn't haapen

what the fuck are you even talking about

Drasta · Post by **Drasta** » August 29, 2003, 9:43 pm

im talking about how the bible is a work of fiction ... but i doubt the religious leaders would use that to try and get outta the law suit

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » August 29, 2003, 10:28 pm

You are a retard. Much of the bible can be shown by other historians to be factually correct. Never post again.

Kelgar · Post by **Kelgar** » August 29, 2003, 11:51 pm

You are a retard. Much of the bible can be shown by other historians to be factually correct. Never post again.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

Ok, now that that's out of the system, please show us which parts are "factually correct".

Sionistic · Post by **Sionistic** » August 30, 2003, 12:01 am

didnt they say under the correct circumstances that the reed sea can split?

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » August 31, 2003, 11:01 am

yeah, i here if you raid an egyptian tomb and loot moses's staff, you can have the power to part the red sea too...

Xyun · Post by **Xyun** » August 31, 2003, 11:39 am

Not only that, but you also get +20 Str +20 int +20 wis +100 hp +100 mana.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » September 2, 2003, 3:59 pm

Moses parting the red sea wouldn't have been a big deal if the fools chasing him had taken the time to camp Hadden for some fishbone earrings!

Deward · Post by **Deward** » September 3, 2003, 9:58 am

There is also several theories that American Humans came from Atlantis or Mu when/if it sank. Mu was the pacific version of Atlantis that supposedly sank around 10000 years ago. A professor in the early 20th century claimed to have found hieroglyphic symbols that predated egyptian hieroglyphics and that matched tablets found in several other parts of the world. He wrote several books on the subject.

I am not saying I believe it all but it made for some interesting reading when I came across the theory several years ago in my university library.

Truant · Post by **Truant** » September 3, 2003, 12:57 pm

Deward wrote:There is also several theories that American Humans came from Atlantis or Mu when/if it sank. Mu was the pacific version of Atlantis that supposedly sank around 10000 years ago. A professor in the early 20th century claimed to have found hieroglyphic symbols that predated egyptian hieroglyphics and that matched tablets found in several other parts of the world. He wrote several books on the subject.

I am not saying I believe it all but it made for some interesting reading when I came across the theory several years ago in my university library.

I would say that is a much less widely supported theory. In fact, I bet you could count the number of scholars who support this on one hand. Heh