Why Bush is a coward

Xyun · Post by **Xyun** » March 3, 2003, 9:04 pm

A coward shys away from any real or formidable foe, and glorifies the defeat of a defenseless one.

N. Korea has, in the last 2 weeks, test fired long range missiles, withdrew from the no-big-mean-bombs treaty, flew a fighter jet into S. Korea for the first time in 20 years, and 4 of their fighters surrounded an American surveillance plane (one of which came within 50 feet of it) and kindly escorted it back to Japan.

Iraq has, in the last 2 weeks, destroyed several long range missiles which pale in comparison to N.Korea's arsenal, shown evidence of destroyed chemical and biological WMD's, mustered the support of most of the U.N. and most of the world, and practically begged not to be invaded.

I will not, however, detract from my belief that Bush is the best American president ever to be appointed.

Xaem · Post by **Xaem** » March 3, 2003, 9:43 pm

Xyun wrote:I will not, however, detract from my belief that Bush is the best American president ever to be appointed.

Ha!

Kagan_Masterwang · Post by **Kagan_Masterwang** » March 3, 2003, 11:04 pm

go to

http://www.bushbodycount.com

bush is ghey

Adex_Xeda · Post by **Adex_Xeda** » March 3, 2003, 11:56 pm

Actually this shows that Bush's pressure is working.

Do you think Saddam would be destroying missiles if we didn't have a gun to his head?

The yahoos running North Korea are going to colapse under their own problems, we don't need to intervene.

Their only chance for keeping in power is to somehow pick a fight with the USA, or to blackmail us into restoring food supplies again. Once those fellas have a disgruntled, starving army, they'll lose their power and be overthrown by their own folks.

Coward? nah,

Xyun · Post by **Xyun** » March 4, 2003, 2:17 am

The yahoos running North Korea are going to colapse under their own problems, we don't need to intervene.

Adex, this is the most naive statement you have ever made. Even for you, this is phenomenal.

Marbus · Post by **Marbus** » March 4, 2003, 2:48 am

I think what he was trying to say is that "we don't need to do anything yet" Give them time to screw it up themselves. I mean come on, does anyone really think N Korea could actually get one of the <10 missles through our defenses? I think not... however a little VX Gas could probably make it through customs on any number of ports... scary, sad but probably true.

Me... I personally think we need to take Saddam out. However seeing the BS these pussies all over the world have been whineing about makes me want to retch. I was broken hearted when I saw people from my ancestoral home (Germany) waving a banner comparing Bush with Hitler! What kind of stupid fuck comes up with something like that? Did they just quit teaching History over there? or are their teenagers like so many in America that they just don't care... they just want something to whine about. But who knows it's possibly our fault as we must have somehow failed in the billions of dollars we spent rebuilding.

Everyday I lean more and more to the idea of us just pulling all the troops back and tighten up the boarders so nothing gets through. Then after Iraq has killed a couple million of those dumb-fucks we can go in and clean house. This time, fuck France, we aren't giving it back, it can apply for Statehood. Iraq though, we keep our word and help them rebuild their country.

Cheers!
Marb

wadana · Post by **wadana** » March 4, 2003, 3:52 am

Geeeze someone give the americans a chill pill and give 20 more to bush and maybe we can talk about this then.

P.S can anyone think within a sane state of mind here cause im starting to think this whole fucking world has just lost it

Zamtuk · Post by **Zamtuk** » March 4, 2003, 4:05 am

Shut the fuck up you dumb bastard. Do you post sane things or just some random rickshaw comments? In fact why do you even post? Does it make your day to come to a place where everyone hates you and make stupid fucking comments so everyone can hate you more? Do us a favor and shoot yourself in the head before you waste one more breath of out oxygen.

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » March 4, 2003, 4:15 am

Zamtuk wrote:Shut the fuck up you dumb bastard. Do you post sane things or just some random rickshaw comments? In fact why do you even post? Does it make your day to come to a place where everyone hates you and make stupid fucking comments so everyone can hate you more? Do us a favor and shoot yourself in the head before you waste one more breath of out oxygen.

Unlike some people, who jump on the nearest bandwagon and flame people just because someone else happens to be.

Some people inform others how stupid and unliked they are, then suggest suicide as an option.

Some people need to be under the bandwagon, where they belong.

Zamtuk · Post by **Zamtuk** » March 4, 2003, 4:21 am

Masekle wrote:Unlike some people, who jump on the nearest bandwagon and flame people just because someone else happens to be.

Umm, looking through the thread, I can only see one Wadana post. Mine is directly under it. So what bandwagon did I jump on? OH IT MUST BE THAT ELUSIVE A-TEAM BANDWAGON!!11!

Masekle wrote:Some people inform others how stupid and unliked they are, then suggest suicide as an option.

Some people need to be under the bandwagon, where they belong.

And some people don't know they wore out their welcome a while ago. Like you.

wadana · Post by **wadana** » March 4, 2003, 4:28 am

you want to take me out you fuck ill give you a fucking gun myself bitch come ON bring it

Zamtuk · Post by **Zamtuk** » March 4, 2003, 4:32 am

OMG! A RL threat in 10 posts. I smell a record!!!!

Fucking retard.

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » March 4, 2003, 4:34 am

I dont know if its your Avatar or the way you make the hair stand up on the back of my neck, whenever I see your name. Either way I regard you as the biggest dork I have ever had the chance to read a post from.

Any time a group of people are Flaming someone you seem to find it uplifting to jump in and add something.

I dont think telling someone to shoot themselves is a cool flame. I dont think you are cool either.

I am welcome wherever I hang my hat, anytime, anywhere I want

The post Wadana made, I didnt see, required the brutal personal attack that you felt the need to toss.

You did not flame the post, you flamed the person. and you used PLURAL accents frequently, in several of your applications

Once again I calmly explain something to you. I cant imagine why, Patience is something I have very little of. Enjoy it

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » March 4, 2003, 4:36 am

oh great here is shaerra 2.0 to wreck another thread.

wadana · Post by **wadana** » March 4, 2003, 4:36 am

screw you pal unlike some people i have a real fucking life outside of EQ hahha maybe one day you can rejoin reality as we know it but you seem to be content with your stareing 24/7 into a reality created by a machine to each his own.

Zamtuk · Post by **Zamtuk** » March 4, 2003, 4:37 am

JUMPING ON THE BANDWAGON EH KYOUKAN!!!???//1

wadana · Post by **wadana** » March 4, 2003, 4:40 am

thank you masekly

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » March 4, 2003, 4:41 am

Zamtuk wrote:OMG! A RL threat in 10 posts. I smell a record!!!!

Fucking retard.

In my opinion telling someone to kill themselves in RL would be a threat. I happen to know the families of a couple persons that have commited suicide. If I had ever heard someone suggesting suicide to them because they were so stupid and unliked. I would have been real sure to remind them of it.

Zamtuk · Post by **Zamtuk** » March 4, 2003, 4:43 am

Main Entry: threat
Pronunciation: 'thret
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English thret coercion, threat, from Old English threat coercion; akin to Middle High German droz annoyance, Latin trudere to push, thrust
Date: before 12th century
1 : an expression of intention to inflict evil, injury, or damage
2 : one that threatens
3 : an indication of something impending <the sky held a threat of rain>

How was that a threat moron?

wadana · Post by **wadana** » March 4, 2003, 4:46 am

i was sayinng you moron i would give the gun to you and you can do that job yourself since your so keen on my being dead why now make it happen huh?

Zamtuk · Post by **Zamtuk** » March 4, 2003, 4:47 am

wadana · Post by **wadana** » March 4, 2003, 4:50 am

holy crist and your calling me stupid LOL this has to be one of the funnier reply's i have heard in awhile.

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » March 4, 2003, 4:51 am

Zamtuk wrote:Main Entry: threat
Pronunciation: 'thret
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English thret coercion, threat, from Old English threat coercion; akin to Middle High German droz annoyance, Latin trudere to push, thrust
Date: before 12th century
1 : an expression of intention to inflict evil, injury, or damage
2 : one that threatens
3 : an indication of something impending <the sky held a threat of rain>

How was that a threat moron?

Line 1::: You suggest Suicide: Imagine this you dont know the HUMAN on the other side of that screen. What if they took your advice? how would their loved ones feel? Happy? pleased? Your intention is to inflict evil, injury, and damge to whomever you victomize, if the person follows your suggestion.

wadana · Post by **wadana** » March 4, 2003, 4:54 am

this world has lost all common sence its free for all now im guessing

Xyun · Post by **Xyun** » March 4, 2003, 5:04 am

All of you ignorant bitches need to gtfo out of my thread. I'm so tired of reading this shit of what should or should not be said on the internet. GET THE FUCK OVER IT. If someone wants to flame someone for nothing more than pure entertainment, this is the forum to do so.

Maselke, don't take me back to last week, I was purely disgusted with your 19 page thread and I truly don't want to see another ode to idiocy.

wadana · Post by **wadana** » March 4, 2003, 5:09 am

yes sir

/em salutes

marches off into the cold battleground

Adex_Xeda · Post by **Adex_Xeda** » March 4, 2003, 5:23 am

Xyun, I am naive in many things.

You can rest well in knowing that I do not determine US foreign policy.

I do maintain however that the aggressive actions by NK as of late are strong indicators that they *need* outside support to prevent their leadership structure from colapsing.

Notice that all of these stunts started happening AFTER the world community withdrew critical aid. Also notice that they were quite content for the past 50 years to stay xenophobically quiet, *until* they saw their power structure failing.

So what do you do? You fire up your reactors, you threaten your neighbors, talk about firey nuclear war, and thrump your shield, hoping that the other guy will flinch and restore food aid.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » March 4, 2003, 5:56 am

north korea's been quiet for 50 years?

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » March 4, 2003, 6:05 am

Xyun wrote:All of you ignorant bitches need to gtfo out of my thread. I'm so tired of reading this shit of what should or should not be said on the internet. GET THE FUCK OVER IT. If someone wants to flame someone for nothing more than pure entertainment, this is the forum to do so.

Maselke, don't take me back to last week, I was purely disgusted with your 19 page thread and I truly don't want to see another ode to idiocy.

A flame is a flame, flaming someones integrity, intelligence or their point of view. I like anyone else enjoy and get a laugh out of a flame on someone elses point of view. If you find it entertaining to read words telling someone else to go shoot themselves... Words cannot express my opinion.

The Constitution of our United States Gave Everyone the right to express what they feel. In a time when you were FACING the person or persons you were expressing too.

Go to your browser type in Netiquette, read a little on my "ode to idiocy"

While your at it look up the definition of a flame.

Read up a little in the thread. You will see that I FLAMED his POST which was NOT a FLAME. It was an outright attack on this person, ending with a suggestion of suicide as a cure for his "problem".

I will not change my opinion thats how I feel. If it bothers you that I post my opinion, there is a ltttle button up there in the upper right hand corner of all my posts. -STFU-... use it

A coward shys away from any real or formidable foe, and glorifies the defeat of a defenseless one.

Did you call yourself a coward?

Adex_Xeda · Post by **Adex_Xeda** » March 4, 2003, 6:24 am

Well Kyo, sitting here half asleep at 3 o'clock in the morning, waiting on laundry, I can't seem to recall anything particularly outgoing from the NK folk in the past 50 years.

Kelgar · Post by **Kelgar** » March 4, 2003, 6:40 am

Why does this not surprise me? Must run in the family.

Jack Delaney and Ted White
These young men were killed when pilot George H. W. Bush abandoned his plane when it was hit by enemy fire. Much has been made of this story - Bush propaganda would have us believe that he was a hero. An eyewitness to the event tells us otherwise: Chester Mierzejewski, who was the turret gunner in another plane, had an unobstructed view. He states that he saw a "puff of smoke" come from Bush's plane and quickly dissipate. He states that the plane was never on fire and that Bush never attempted a water landing, which was standard procedure, and which would have given Mr. Delaney and Mr. White a chance.

Also....it looks like Metal Gear Solid had some interesting plotlines which mirrored what happened to some of the involvees in Watergate!

Lou Russell
Lou Russell worked as a private detective for an agency that was helping George H.W. Bush, then chairman of the RNC, prepare for a press conference. It is a rumor that Lou Russell was the fabled "sixth burglar" of Watergate, the one who got away. On May 16, 1973, "Deep Throat" warned Bob Woodward that "Everyone's life is in danger." and that "electronic surveillance is going on and we had better watch it.". On May 18, Lou Russell suffered a massive heart attack that put him in Adventist Hospital, where he recovered somewhat and stayed until June 20. Russell told his daughter that he believed he had been poisoned. On July 2, two weeks after his release from the hospital, he had another "heart attack" and died.

John Leon
He was a friend and associate of Lou Russell. He was collecting statements about Watergate, and was to be the focus of a press conference. Leon suffered a "heart attack" and died, on the day before the conference was to be held.

Although none of the above events relate much to Duhbya, it sure discloses OMGIAMRETARDEDCAUSEALOTISTWOWORDS of the shady goings-on that the Bush family has been involved in. Let's not forget that grandpappy Prescott made a sizable chunk of their family fortune by dealing with the Nazis.

Very interesting read, Kagan

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » March 4, 2003, 7:32 am

"Flaming" is what people do when they express a strongly held opinion without holding back any emotion. It's the kind of message that makes people respond, "Oh come on, tell us how you really feel." Tact is not its objective.

In State v. Boyd, the court suggests why flames cannot generally be protected as free speech: "On the Internet, discussions are usually private in nature, although they are often subject to public inspection. Even discussion groups consider their dialogues to be the private reflections of a number of members. When a private person is subject to another's publishing of a false and defamatory communication intentionally or negligently, wrong has been done".

BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY, 6th ed., defines defamation as:

An intentional false communication, either published or publicly spoken, that injures another's reputation or good name. Holding up of a person to ridicule, scorn or contempt in a respectable and considerable part of the community; may be criminal as well as civil. Includes both libel and slander. Defamation is that which tends to injure reputation; to diminish the esteem, respect, goodwill or confidence in which the plaintiff is held, or to excite adverse, derogatory or unpleasant feelings or opinions against him. Statement which exposes person to contempt, hatred, ridicule or obloquy. McGowen v. Prentice, La.App., 341 So.2d 55, 57 (La. 3d Cir. Ct. App. 1976) rehearing denied Jan. 26, 1977. The unprivileged publication of false statements which naturally and proximately result in injury to another. Wolfson v. Kirk, Fla.App., 273 So.2d 774, 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY, 6th ed., defines libel as:

A method of defamation expressed by print, writing, pictures, or signs. In its most general sense, any publication that is injurious to the reputation of another. A false and unprivileged publication in writing of defamatory material. Bright v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist., 51 Cal.App.3d 852, 124 Cal.Rptr. 598, 604 (Cal. 2nd DCA 1972). A maliciously written or printed publication which tends to blacken a person's reputation or to expose him to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule, or to injure him in his business or profession. Corabi v. Curtis Pub. Co., 441 Pa. 432, 273 A.2d 899, 904 (Pa. 1971).

Clearly, the central issue becomes responsibility. Trying electronic communication defamation cases, attorneys may have a difficult time establishing duty and proximate cause. However, if all users bear ultimate responsibility for their accounts, then both components are more easily defined. Today's bright minds would not be able to hide behind pseudonyms and endless connecting points; instead, they would be held to any remark, positive or negative, that they have made. And, if every address is to have a definable user, flames will be more directly traceable, and proximate cause may be more easily established

In a world desperately in need of understanding and tolerance, disagreements are common. It is how participants in communications handle such disagreements that shapes today's complex social arena. Flames are serious, personal attacks possessing no relation to the spirit of cooperative learning or to active discussion, and they should be treated as such under the law. If the law does not keep pace with the ever-growing breadth and depth of technology, mankind will suffer

This is the first step to The end of "Flaming" as we know it. "EVERY ADDRESS WILL HAVE A DEFINEABLE USER". In other words I can find out WHO you are WITH your ADDRESS. Regulation is the answer to What you call my "ode to idiocy"

Some people say the social security number is the mark of the beast.

I say it will be your IP address. Regulated in the near future. Every single person will have an IP address. You will not be able to communicate AT ALL with out it.

The Telephone as we know it will be a thing of the past. If you wish to communicate it will be done so on the internet. Everything you do or say will be RECORDED and REGULATED

There will be no currency. Your account will be at your IP address. Any transaction you make will be recorded.

Flaming and malicious attacks, no matter how small, are contributing to the opinions of people, who believe persons should be held accountable for their actions. These same people have the resources to implement regulation.

Stop now while there is still a chance !!

Have a nice day =)

Kguku · Post by **Kguku** » March 4, 2003, 7:54 am

Please leave these boards already, you're making me sick. What happened to you leaving after your little goodbye post? Stop the insanity!

vn_Tanc · Post by **vn_Tanc** » March 4, 2003, 7:58 am

STFU #3!
Press that little button and improve your quality of life IMMEDIATELY!
You know it makes sense

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » March 4, 2003, 8:01 am

Kguku wrote:Please leave these boards already, you're making me sick. What happened to you leaving after your little goodbye post? Stop the insanity!

You call what I posted insanity?

http://journal.law.ufl.edu/~techlaw/1/toc.html

Read it and weep bright boy.

BTW I retired from the game, not from making your day.

I would guess flaming the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, by calling him a coward. Falls somewhere in this, my response, to the subject matter of this thread.

I cant help it if I hop my personal bandwagon a little while researching my response.

wadana · Post by **wadana** » March 4, 2003, 8:36 am

lol this is just to funny

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » March 4, 2003, 10:13 am

wadana wrote:screw you pal unlike some people i have a real fucking life outside of EQ hahha maybe one day you can rejoin reality as we know it but you seem to be content with your stareing 24/7 into a reality created by a machine to each his own.

OMG he played the " I have a real life outside of EQ Card" whats next the "Race Card"

Go give your self a shotgun enemia please

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » March 4, 2003, 10:15 am

Masekle wrote:
Zamtuk wrote:OMG! A RL threat in 10 posts. I smell a record!!!!

Fucking retard.
In my opinion telling someone to kill themselves in RL would be a threat. I happen to know the families of a couple persons that have commited suicide. If I had ever heard someone suggesting suicide to them because they were so stupid and unliked. I would have been real sure to remind them of it.

I dont fucking blame them, they knew you, I would commit suicide if I knew you too. Now please Take your Burger and drive thru.

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » March 4, 2003, 10:17 am

I'll take that with mustard and NO pickles
By the way you deserve a raise. I will contact burger king with my recommendation

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » March 4, 2003, 10:21 am

Masekle wrote:I'll take that with mustard and NO pickles
By the way you deserve a raise. I will contact burger king with my recommendation

Oh Masekle I would love to work at BK for one day just to make you that special Man Burger you love to gobble.

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » March 4, 2003, 10:24 am

Its good to have goals in life. Some hold a little more value Guess it would be a step up for you in this case.

Fairweather Pure · Post by **Fairweather Pure** » March 4, 2003, 10:27 am

Also notice that they were quite content for the past 50 years to stay xenophobically quiet, *until* they saw their power structure failing.

Actually, NK started stirring up the soup shortly after Dubya's "Axis of Evil" speech, which I will never forgive him for even uttering. He labeled China, Iraq, and NK as evil, and our enemies. If someone compared me to 2 other contries that they considered "evil", then attacked one of those other countries, I would think my country could very well be next, and I would start preparations to make sure they think twice about it. NK is doing exactely that. Flaunting thier power, showing that they are not scared of the US, and also stating that they are prepared to do whatever it takes to preserve thier country.

The "Axis of Evil" speech immediatley sowed the seeds of distrust, suspicion, and anger amoung China, NK, and Iraq (who basically had those feelings anyway). Remember the whole spy plane disaster with China? IMO, that was another direct result of Dubya's speech. China had to flex thier cocks for George, and it worked for them. We haven't fucked with China since that incident.

This administration has damaged our country in so many ways, it will take scholars the next 20 years just to figure out how we went to shit in such a short amount of time.

Deward · Post by **Deward** » March 4, 2003, 10:40 am

Wasn't the axis of evil Iran, Iraq and North Korea? I can't imagine Bush being dumb enough to kick the China hornet's nest. We make too much money off of them. I could be wrong but I am pretty sure China wasn't in the axis speech.

Bush was still wrong for ever mentioning NK though. Kim Jong Il loves the press and we never should of given him an opening. I think Bush did it because he didn't like how NK and SK were getting so chummy. Iraq doesn't scare me at all but getting into it with NK would be so much more ugly. I am not sure we could win that war.

Deward

Xyun · Post by **Xyun** » March 4, 2003, 10:46 am

Masekle,

You are a delusional retarded fuck if you think you are even in the same league as me. You got owned by Atokal for god's sake. Have you no shame?? I have no problem smacking you down like the bitch you are as I did when you first started posting on these boards.

dec 21

Unfortunately, you are so damn ignorant that you withstood 20 pages of assramming and have come back for more. You sabotage every fucking thread with your holier-than-thou fucking nonsense, and yet you violate the very nature of the ideas you set forth. Your biggest flaw is that you fail to understand yourself and your own hypocracy, which leads to your failing to understand reality. Furthermore, because you have such a frail ego, you resort to threats of RL violence to compensate for your inadequacy in verbal battles, and ironically you turn around and falsely accuse and criticize others for this behavior.

Despite all this and regardless of how often and potently you get pwned, you never ever give up. My guess is that your thirst for acceptance forbids you to admit when you have lost, and yet you fail to recognize that this thirst will never be quenched here. You epitomize the phrase "sore loser". Sore from the verbal raping you endure, and loser... well that's self explanatory. You have successfully secured your status as a pariah on VV, and are ignorant to this fact. You are in fact, mentally blind.

All this and more I have been able to deduce from only 2 months of reading your moronic drivel. You have a mountain of psychological and social issues to overcome. The only reason you have not been added to my ignore list thusfar is that your stupidity is mildly amusing to me. I have no reservations about defamating you because, unlike you, I understand the first amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » March 4, 2003, 10:49 am

HOLY SHIT!!! Maskele Bend over I got the Fire Extinguisher.

Fairweather Pure · Post by **Fairweather Pure** » March 4, 2003, 10:53 am

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/feb20 ... -f15.shtml

Simply do a Google search for -Bush axis of evil- and you'll not find a favorable article or comment about that speech. The one above discusses how much that comment affected the Koreas.

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » March 4, 2003, 10:53 am

Xyun wrote:Masekle,

You are a delusional retarded fuck if you think you are even in the same league as me. You got owned by Atokal for god's sake. Have you no shame?? I have no problem smacking you down like the bitch you are as I did when you first started posting on these boards.

dec 21

Unfortunately, you are so damn ignorant that you withstood 20 pages of assramming and have come back for more. You sabotage every fucking thread with your holier-than-thou fucking nonsense, and yet you violate the very nature of the ideas you set forth. Your biggest flaw is that you fail to understand yourself and your own hypocracy, which leads to your failing to understand reality. Furthermore, because you have such a frail ego, you resort to threats of RL violence to compensate for your inadequacy in verbal battles, and ironically you turn around and falsely accuse and criticize others for this behavior.

Despite all this and regardless of how often and potently you get pwned, you never ever give up. My guess is that your thirst for acceptance forbids you to admit when you have lost, and yet you fail to recognize that this thirst will never be quenched here. You epitomize the phrase "sore loser". Sore from the verbal raping you endure, and loser... well that's self explanatory. You have successfully secured your status as a pariah on VV, and are ignorant to this fact. You are in fact, mentally blind.

All this and more I have been able to deduce from only 2 months of reading your moronic drivel. You have a mountain of psychological and social issues to overcome. The only reason you have not been added to my ignore list thusfar is that your stupidity is mildly amusing to me. I have no reservations about defamating you because, unlike you, I understand the first amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.

The Twelve Commandments of Flaming
Make things up about your opponent: It's important to make your lies sound true. Preface your argument with the word "clearly." "Clearly, Brian Hillis is a racist, and a dirtball to boot."
Be an armchair psychologist: You're a smart person. You've heard of Freud. You took a psychology course in college. Clearly, you're qualified to psychoanalyze your opponent. "Peach Pshawski (God Bless You!), by using the word 'zucchini' in her posting, shows she has a bad case of .........."
Cross-post your flames: Everyone on the net is just waiting for the next literary masterpiece to leave your terminal. From OPINION to EZ-READER to PETS to CHIT-CHAT, they're all holding their breaths until your next flame. Therefore, post everywhere.
Conspiracies abound: If everyone's against you, the reason can't *possibly* be that you're a #anatomypart@. There's obviously a conspiracy against you, and you will be doing the entire net a favor by exposing it.
Lawsuit threats: This is the reverse of Rule #4 (sort of like the Yin & Yang of flaming). Threatening a lawsuit is always considered to be in good form. "By saying that I've posted to the wrong group, |Didley has libelled me, slandered me, and sodomized me. See you in court, |Didley."
Force them to document their claims: Even if Ralph Gagliano states outright that he likes tomato sauce on his pasta, you should demand documentation. If Newsweek hasn't written an article on Ralph's pasta preferences, then Ralph's obviously lying.
Use foreign phrases: French is good, but Latin is the lingua franca of flaming. You should use the words "ad hominem" at least three times per article. Other favorite Latin phrases are "ad nauseum," "vini, vidi, vici," "fetuccini alfredo,"...
Tell 'em how smart you are: Why use intelligent arguments to convince them you're smart when all you have to do is tell them? State that you're a member of Mensa or Mega or Dorks of America. Tell them the scores you received on every exam since high school. "I got an 800 on my SATs, LSATs, GREs, MCATs, and I can also spell the word 'premeiotic.'"
Accuse your opponent of censorship. It is your right as an American citizen to post whatever the hell you want to the net (as guaranteed by the 37th Amendment, I think). Anyone who tries to limit your cross-posting or move a flame war to Netusers is either a communist, a fascist, or both.
Doubt their existence: You've never actually seen your opponent, have you? And since you're the center of the universe, you should have seen them by now, shouldn't you? Therefore, THEY DON'T EXIST! This is the beauty of flamers' logic.
Lie, cheat, steal, leave the toilet seat up.
When in doubt, insult: If you forget the other 11 rules, remember this one. At some point during your wonderful career as a flamer, you will undoubtedly end up in a flame war with someone who is better than you. This person will expose your lies, tear apart your arguments, make you look generally like a bozo. At this point, there's only one thing to do: insult the dirtbag!!! "Oh yeah? Well, your mother does strange things with ..........."

From: rolleston_c@ix.wcc.govt.nz (Chris Rolleston)

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » March 4, 2003, 10:57 am

You sir can suck my cock and if the friction involved causes combustion and needs an extinguisher, Cartalas can run home and get his

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » March 4, 2003, 10:58 am

Masekle wrote:You sir can suck my cock and if the friction involved causes combustion and needs an extinguisher, Cartalas can run home and get his

Im sorry now that was funny

Fairweather Pure · Post by **Fairweather Pure** » March 4, 2003, 10:58 am

Deward, I conceed that the original "Axis of evil" speech was merely Iran, Iraq, and NK. However, that list was expanded to include others.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1971852.stm

That adds Syria, Lybia, and Cuba. I am most certian that China was added in a similar manner, however I cannot find any artcles to support my claim, so I may have mentally thrown them into the mix somehow. At any rate, we're making more enemies than friends right now, at a time when we need friends more than anything else.

EDIT: China immediatley blasted the US for even using the phrase "Axis of evil". Bush did not name China in any such speech, however, China was highly critical of the coutries he did label. Hostility none-the-less.

VeeshanVault

Why Bush is a coward

Why Bush is a coward

Re: Why Bush is a coward

figures..