Journalism at it's worst..

What do you think about the world?
Post Reply
Soreali
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1374
Joined: July 3, 2002, 3:49 pm
Gender: Male
XBL Gamertag: Dyerseve 1321
Location: Jersey

Journalism at it's worst..

Post by Soreali »

http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/200909 ... tico/26759

Put the article below because it's pretty damn big.

[Show]
Defense Secretary Robert Gates is objecting “in the strongest terms” to an Associated Press decision to transmit a photograph showing a mortally wounded 21-year-old Marine in his final moments of life, calling the decision “appalling” and a breach of “common decency.”
The AP reported that the Marine’s father had asked – in an interview and in a follow-up phone call — that the image, taken by an embedded photographer, not be published.
The AP reported in a story that it decided to make the image public anyway because it “conveys the grimness of war and the sacrifice of young men and women fighting it.”
The photo shows Lance Cpl. Joshua M. Bernard of New Portland, Maine, who was struck by a rocket-propelled grenade in a Taliban ambush Aug. 14 in Helmand province of southern Afghanistan, according to The AP.
Gates wrote to Thomas Curley, AP’s president and chief executive officer. “Out of respect for his family’s wishes, I ask you in the strongest of terms to reconsider your decision. I do not make this request lightly. In one of my first public statements as Secretary of Defense, I stated that the media should not be treated as the enemy, and made it a point to thank journalists for revealing problems that need to be fixed – as was the case with Walter Reed."
“I cannot imagine the pain and suffering Lance Corporal Bernard’s death has caused his family. Why your organization would purposefully defy the family’s wishes knowing full well that it will lead to yet more anguish is beyond me. Your lack of compassion and common sense in choosing to put this image of their maimed and stricken child on the front page of multiple American newspapers is appalling. The issue here is not law, policy or constitutional right – but judgment and common decency.”
The four-paragraph letter concluded, “Sincerely,” then had Gates’ signature.
The photo, first transmitted Thursday morning and repeated Friday morning, carries the warning, “EDS NOTE: GRAPHIC CONTENT.”
The caption says: “In this photo taken Friday, Aug. 14, 2009, Lance Cpl. Joshua Bernard is tended to by fellow U.S. Marines after being hit by a rocket propelled grenade during a firefight against the Taliban in the village of Dahaneh in the Helmand Province of Afghanistan. Bernard was transported by helicopter to Camp Leatherneck where he later died of his wounds.”
Gates’ letter was sent Thursday, after he talked to Curley by phone at about 3:30 p.m. Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said Gates told Curley: “I am asking you to reconsider your decision to publish this graphic photograph of Lance Corporal Bernard. I am begging you to defer to the wishes of the family. This will cause them great pain.”
Curley was “very polite and willing to listen,” and send he would reconvene his editorial team and reconsider, Morrell said. Within the hour, Curley called Morrell and said the editors had reconvened but had ultimately come to the same conclusion.
Gates “was greatly disappointed they had not done the right thing,” Morrell said.
The Buffalo News ran the photo on page 4, and the The (Wheeling, W.Va.) Intelligencer ran an editorial defending its decision to run the photo. Some newspapers – including the Arizona Republic, The Washington Times and the Orlando Sentinel – ran other photos from the series. Several newspaper websites – including the Akron Beacon-Journal and the St. Petersburg Times – used the photo online.
Morrell said Gates wanted the information about his conversations released “so everyone would know how strongly he felt about the issue.”
The Associated Press reported in a story about deliberations about that photo that “after a period of reflection,” the news service decided “to make public an image that conveys the grimness of war and the sacrifice of young men and women fighting it.
“The image shows fellow Marines helping Bernard after he suffered severe leg injuries. He was evacuated to a field hospital where he died on the operating table,” AP said. “The picture was taken by Associated Press photographer Julie Jacobson, who accompanied Marines on the patrol and was in the midst of the ambush during which Bernard was wounded. … ‘AP journalists document world events every day. Afghanistan is no exception. We feel it is our journalistic duty to show the reality of the war there, however unpleasant and brutal that sometimes is,’ said Santiago Lyon, the director of photography for AP.
“He said Bernard's death shows ‘his sacrifice for his country. Our story and photos report on him and his last hours respectfully and in accordance with military regulations surrounding journalists embedded with U.S. forces.’”
The AP reported that it “waited until after Bernard's burial in Madison, Maine, on Aug. 24 to distribute its story and the pictures.”
“An AP reporter met with his parents, allowing them to see the images,” the article says. “Bernard's father after seeing the image of his mortally wounded son said he opposed its publication, saying it was disrespectful to his son's memory. John Bernard reiterated his viewpoint in a telephone call to the AP on Wednesday. ‘We understand Mr. Bernard's anguish. We believe this image is part of the history of this war.
The story and photos are in themselves a respectful treatment and recognition of sacrifice,’ said AP senior managing editor John Daniszewski.
“Thursday afternoon, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates called AP President Tom Curley asking that the news organization respect the wishes of Bernard's father and not publish the photo. Curley and AP Executive Editor Kathleen Carroll said they understood this was a painful issue for Bernard's family and that they were sure that factor was being considered by the editors deciding whether or not to publish the photo, just as it had been for the AP editors who decided to distribute it.”
The image was part of a package of stories and photos released for publication after midnight Friday. The project, called “AP Impact – Afghan – Death of a Marine,” carried a dateline of Dahaneh, Afghanistan, and was written by Alfred de Montesquiou and Julie Jacobson:
“The U.S. patrol had a tip that Taliban fighters were lying in ambush in a pomegranate grove, and a Marine trained his weapon on the trees. Seconds later, a salvo of gunfire and rocket-propelled grenades poured out, and a grenade hit Lance Cpl. Joshua ‘Bernie’ Bernard. The Marine was about to become the next fatality in the deadliest month of the deadliest year of the Afghan war.”
The news service also moved extensive journal entries AP photographer Julie Jacobson wrote while in Afghanistan. AP said in an advisory: “From the reporting of Alfred de Montesquiou, the photos and written journal kept by Julie Jacobson, and the TV images of cameraman Ken Teh, the AP has compiled ‘Death of a Marine,’ a 1,700 word narrative of the clash, offering vivid insights into how the battle was fought, and into Bernard's character and background. It also includes an interview with his father, an ex-Marine, who three weeks earlier had written letters complaining that the military's rules of engagement are exposing the troops in Afghanistan to undue risk.”
As much as I disagree with journalists being embedded with the army/marines, I can deal with it since it has gotten better for the most part since the war had started. But this makes me sick. I have friends stationed over in Afghanistan right now and if this poor kid had been one of them, I'd be irate. I cant help but feel awful for his parents, his father especially who pretty much pleaded with the AP not to publish the photos.. That story isn't journalism, its awful.
Timmah.


Image
User avatar
Lalanae
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 3309
Joined: September 25, 2002, 11:21 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: Journalism at it's worst..

Post by Lalanae »

Agreed. I've always thought that unless the person's family doesn't object, the final moments of anyone's life should not be public. Of course, it would help if people would stop seeking out such photos like a bunch of sickos. I refused to watch the beheading of Nick Berg (I think that was his name?) a few years back, nor did I try to find that picture of the young woman (teen?) who was decapitated during a car accident not too long ago. (The scene picture made it onto the web as it was apparently pretty horrific & her family tried to have it removed, but it kept cropping up). Princess Diana's last pictures, where she was dying, is another example of sick fuckery in our culture. Seeing people dying or dead has NEVER interested me and feel sorry for the families who have their tragedy exploited publicly because some people want to see that kind of stuff.
Lalanae
Burundi High Chancellor for Tourism, Sodomy and Pie
Unofficial Canadian, Forbidden Lover of Pie, Jesus-Hatin'' Sodomite, President of KFC (Kyoukan Fan Club), hawt, perververted, intellectual submissive with E.S.P (Extra Sexual Persuasion)
User avatar
Zaelath
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4621
Joined: April 11, 2003, 5:53 am
Location: Canberra

Re: Journalism at it's worst..

Post by Zaelath »

On the other hand, it's pretty disingenuous for the majority of the public to see the cost of war as photos of young men in crisp, clean uniforms.

I've not seen the photo, and I'm not going looking, but it's a borderline call to me.
May 2003 - "Mission Accomplished"
June 2005 - "The mission isn't easy, and it will not be accomplished overnight"
-- G W Bush, freelance writer for The Daily Show.
User avatar
Nick
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 5711
Joined: July 4, 2002, 3:45 pm

Re: Journalism at it's worst..

Post by Nick »

I can't really give a shit.

We've all seen plenty of blown up people in the last 6 years given what this guy was fighting for. Big loss. :roll:
User avatar
Xatrei
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2104
Joined: July 22, 2002, 4:28 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Boringham, AL

Re: Journalism at it's worst..

Post by Xatrei »

I honestly don't have a problem with it. People need to see the real, human cost of war - on both sides. So many of the people having a fit about this comparatively dignified photo, were cackling with glee watching gun camera footage of AH-64's mowing down unsuspecting people that were believed to be insurgents. Maybe a lot of the knee-jerk, arm-chair patriots wouldn't be so gung ho if they saw more of this.
"When I was a kid, my father told me, 'Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it.'" - Russel Ziskey
User avatar
laneela
Almost 1337
Almost 1337
Posts: 833
Joined: July 3, 2002, 3:09 pm
Location: Miami Beesh
Contact:

Re: Journalism at it's worst..

Post by laneela »

It's not the picture so much I'm bothered by, it's the fact that the AP published it after the family's explicit request not to. I agree that journalism will be journalism and that people are killed every day in war and that journalists have the right to publish what they see/hear and we, the public have the right to know the truth of what's going on over there - but I'm sure with all the killing, there will be plenty of opportunity for the AP "to make public an image that conveys the grimness of war and the sacrifice of young men and women fighting it" in which the family of the person dying expresses their consent to the picture being made public. In my opinion, this was in extremely poor taste.
Laneela
You may take our lives, but you will never take our trousers!
User avatar
Animalor
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 5902
Joined: July 8, 2002, 12:03 pm
Gender: Male
XBL Gamertag: Anirask
PSN ID: Anirask
Location: Canada

Re: Journalism at it's worst..

Post by Animalor »

The fact is that there is no additional truth to be gained by publishing this particular story. The AP published this solely to create news, even though it itself is at the core of it, to increase readership and generate a controversy.

This is a complete dick move and brings them that much close to the rank of tabloid on my mind.
User avatar
Tyek
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2288
Joined: December 9, 2002, 5:52 pm
Gender: Male
XBL Gamertag: Tyekk
PSN ID: Tyek
Location: UCLA and Notre Dame

Re: Journalism at it's worst..

Post by Tyek »

Animalor wrote:The fact is that there is no additional truth to be gained by publishing this particular story. The AP published this solely to create news, even though it itself is at the core of it, to increase readership and generate a controversy.

This is a complete dick move and brings them that much close to the rank of tabloid on my mind.
I am pretty much under the impression that all news is now tabloid news. Fox may be more blantant more often, but MSNBC and CNN have become pretty awful themselves and network TV news is a joke. Worst of all is the local tv news.
When I was younger, I used to think that the world was doing it to me and that the world owes me some thing…When you're a teeny bopper, that's what you think. I'm 40 now, I don't think that anymore, because I found out it doesn't f--king work. One has to go through that. For the people who even bother to go through that, most assholes just accept what it is anyway and get on with it." - John Lennon
Post Reply