.6 times more liberal than the American public
Why, you say? Well, I'm glad you asked. Follow me down this road into the mindset of the true American public.
Now if you look over here, you'll notice thatWikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D. The dates are based on the birth of Jesus, so why pretend otherwise? Conservapedia is Christian-friendly and exposes the CE deception.
Over here in our department for hat the uck you will find thatWikipedia often uses foreign spelling of words, even though most English-speaking users are American. Look up "Most Favored Nation" on Wikipedia and it automatically converts the spelling to the British spelling "Most Favoured Nation." Look up "Division of labor" on Wikipedia and it automatically converts to the British spelling "Division of labour," then insists on the British spelling for "specialization" also.
The Wikipedia entry for the Piltdown Man omits many key facts, such as how it was taught in schools for an entire generation and how the dating methodology used by evolutionists is fraudulent.
(My emphasis, and please note that no quote is cited for the claim of fraudulence).
And in conclusion,
So how is this wonderful new(ish) site going to counter the horrible influence of Wikipedia.com on today's youth? With truth, that's how!There is a strong anti-American and anti-capitalism bias on Wikipedia. In its description of the post-war Bell Trade Act of 1946, in which the United States gave the Philippines $800 million in exchange for some free trade provisions, Wikipedia omits any mention of the $800 million dollars and instead lambasts the "wrath of Father Capitalism."[8] The agreement was approved by popular vote on the Philippines, but the Wikipedia article omits that fact also.
For instance, here's the entry from Conservapedia on the 'Origin of the Kangaroo':
I wouldn't be surprised if the sysadmins at Bob Rogers U automatically routed http://www.wikipedia.org to http://www.conservapedia.com within a month or two. Christ. Literally, Jesus Christ.According to the origins model used by creation scientists, modern kangaroos, like all modern animals, originated in the Middle East[1] and are the descendants of the two founding members of the modern kangaroo baramin that were taken aboard Noah's Ark prior to the Great Flood. It has not yet been determined by baraminologists whether kangaroos form a holobaramin with the wallaby, tree-kangaroo, wallaroo, pademelon and quokka, or if all these species are in fact apobaraminic or polybaraminic.
Also according to creation science, after the Flood, kangaroos bred from the Ark passengers migrated to Australia. There is debate whether this migration happened over land[2] -- as Australia was still for a time connected to the Middle East before the supercontinent of Pangea broke apart[3] -- or if they rafted on mats of vegetation torn up by the receding flood waters
