
Oh and I hate Exchange too!!!
Moderator: TheMachine
Actually that is not true. By SEC regulations all you have to do is make sure you have a company policy, and that you stick to it. I.e. if your policy is to destroy everything after 1 year, then stick to it, don't destroy documents that have been subpoenaed before that 1 year mark.Bubba Grizz wrote:We have a client that is a financial advising company that is not allowed to delete anything in their email including spam due to SEC regulations. They constantly have to be archived and have shit moved to a storage server.
That's the reason we have the policy we do. Taking a cue from MS, if you don't have the email anymore you can't be incriminated by it as long as it's deleted per policy, rather than per incident which can get you in deep doodoo.Canoe wrote:Actually that is not true. By SEC regulations all you have to do is make sure you have a company policy, and that you stick to it. I.e. if your policy is to destroy everything after 1 year, then stick to it, don't destroy documents that have been subpoenaed before that 1 year mark.
Now there are certain exceptions to that rule, i.e. legal documents etc many times have to be retained for 7 years.
Ahhhh well that is the story they are giving us and who are we to argue as we get paid regardless. They keep buying hard drives and filling them so they are keeping us in business too. That is good to know though, thanks. Now I can look smart in front of my coworkers for a bit.Canoe wrote:Actually that is not true. By SEC regulations all you have to do is make sure you have a company policy, and that you stick to it. I.e. if your policy is to destroy everything after 1 year, then stick to it, don't destroy documents that have been subpoenaed before that 1 year mark.Bubba Grizz wrote:We have a client that is a financial advising company that is not allowed to delete anything in their email including spam due to SEC regulations. They constantly have to be archived and have shit moved to a storage server.
Now there are certain exceptions to that rule, i.e. legal documents etc many times have to be retained for 7 years.
I live and breathe in the new "Sarbanes" world, and I laugh because the "SEC" and "Sarbanes" get blamed for doing EVERYTHING. It's just that people have gotten gun shy.
Now granted, I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea to keep everything, besides the complete lack of efficiency and costing way too muchBut it's not SEC regulation to never delete "anything" - that's just not true. Company policy maybe to cover their butt in "case" of something happening, but not SEC regulation.
Bubba Grizz wrote:Ahhhh well that is the story they are giving us and who are we to argue as we get paid regardless. They keep buying hard drives and filling them so they are keeping us in business too. That is good to know though, thanks. Now I can look smart in front of my coworkers for a bit.Canoe wrote:Actually that is not true. By SEC regulations all you have to do is make sure you have a company policy, and that you stick to it. I.e. if your policy is to destroy everything after 1 year, then stick to it, don't destroy documents that have been subpoenaed before that 1 year mark.Bubba Grizz wrote:We have a client that is a financial advising company that is not allowed to delete anything in their email including spam due to SEC regulations. They constantly have to be archived and have shit moved to a storage server.
Now there are certain exceptions to that rule, i.e. legal documents etc many times have to be retained for 7 years.
I live and breathe in the new "Sarbanes" world, and I laugh because the "SEC" and "Sarbanes" get blamed for doing EVERYTHING. It's just that people have gotten gun shy.
Now granted, I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea to keep everything, besides the complete lack of efficiency and costing way too muchBut it's not SEC regulation to never delete "anything" - that's just not true. Company policy maybe to cover their butt in "case" of something happening, but not SEC regulation.
Hehe, i just admit i actually like Notes. True, if we only used mail and calendar, it would be WAY to cumbersome to work with, but when you use Sametime and use a load of databases, it actually work pretty well.Aslanna wrote:It's a lot easier to create an offline archive mailbox with Outlook than it is with Notes. Although I can see why companies frown upon that.
Hehe, can only agree, Sametime sucks.Aslanna wrote: Oh and so does their Sametime client. Suck, that is. Get NotesBuddy. It's much nicer! (once you turn of the email portion and the voice stuff)
Well, my predecessor purchased Exchange Standard which limited the mailstore to 16GB total. But thanks to the most recent SP, the mailstore was increased to 75 GB.Cartalas wrote:I hope they all die![]()
Oh and I hate Exchange too!!!
Hehe, we got 4 lists.Aslanna wrote:If they were smart they'd create a list of approved programs rather than one for non-approved programs. I'm sure it would be much smaller.
Give NotesBuddy a try. Assuming it's not on the 'bad' list! I like the chat archiving feature so you have a record of who said what.
Hehe, i actually had the exact opposite problem. Got a few users with a program used on i think 7 or 8 comps total, but need to be used on 10+ to be put on the support list. So our boss told me i could NOT go help them install it (although i have done it for 3 years, and wrote documentation on how to do it), they could get help from the persons supporting the program (another hospital).miir wrote:I like dealing with users who escalate when one of our techs refuses to support their unsupported software.One for programs we help install, but cant support.
Technically, this isn't true anymore with Outlook 2003. The 2GB limit is gone. You can find more info on Microsoft's page.Moonwynd wrote:[
Our biggest issue...PST files. They are all stored on the file servers so they can be backed up. But some people have HUGE PSTs...and they were never meant to get over 2 GB (or they corrupt really easy).