I don't believe that this was actually commisionned by Brit. This thing is wierdness incarnate. It's entitled "Pro-Life: The birth of Sean Preston".
I'll let the picture speak for itself.
I saw this on Yahoo yesterday and was at a loss for words.
The statue is a nude however none of the privates are facing the camera.
How exactly is the birth of a child conceived by Britney Spears and Kevin Federline supposed to be pro-life? Mandatory abortion... That's what I'm talking about.
Laneela
You may take our lives, but you will never take our trousers!
It looks nothing like her, has nothing to do with her, and naming it after her got it a fuckload of cheap publicity it had no chance of attracting otherwise.
Why even bother discussing it? The piece doesn't have a shred of artistic value, either.
wtf?... now maybe if they said it was a statue of her conceiving the baby i'd believe them... but there's no fucking way brittney gave on a bearskin rug looking like shes ready to take it in the ass!
Fash wrote:wtf?... now maybe if they said it was a statue of her conceiving the baby i'd believe them... but there's no fucking way brittney gave on a bearskin rug looking like shes ready to take it in the ass!