9-11 pentagon photos

Xyun · Post by **Xyun** » October 19, 2005, 8:44 am

I've seen a few conspiracy theories floating around on the net about 9-11. While I'm not big on these I do find it odd that none of the pictures I was able to find showed wreckage of the plane that hit the pentagon. I was wondering if anyone else has seen or can find pictures of the actual plane wreckage.

Psyloche · Post by **Psyloche** » October 19, 2005, 9:11 am

Xyun wrote:I've seen a few conspiracy theories floating around on the net about 9-11. While I'm not big on these I do find it odd that none of the pictures I was able to find showed wreckage of the plane that hit the pentagon. I was wondering if anyone else has seen or can find pictures of the actual plane wreckage.

my brother was there and a friend was there when it happened. i don't really see both of them lying to me. i also have never seen pictures, nor have i looked for them though.

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » October 19, 2005, 9:25 am

Psyloche wrote: my brother was there and a friend was there when it happened. i don't really see both of them lying to me. i also have never seen pictures, nor have i looked for them though.

My brother and his friend saw a guy saw a chick in half on stage, oh and Elvis.

Wonko Wenusberg · Post by **Wonko Wenusberg** » October 19, 2005, 9:27 am

It was a Mach7 XRiV WenusBerg Prototybe PentaBuster! Psy knows, yes he knows.

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » October 19, 2005, 9:50 am

Eh I don't believe in the conspiracy theories regarding Pentagon either but there are a lot of really strange things about the incident. They would get rid of a lot of speculation if they released the videos they have of it.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » October 19, 2005, 1:41 pm

I had posted a 2 hour movie called, An Analysis of the 911 Attack that spends half of the movie dealing with the Pentagon crash, lack of wreckage, etc. While the narrator can be annoying and speculate at times, it's great info.

It looks like I lost that one with my HD crash. I'll see if I can find it again. It's worth checking out if I can find it again.

nobody · Post by **nobody** » October 19, 2005, 3:17 pm

Winnow wrote: It looks like I lost that one with my HD crash.

it's a cover-up!

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » October 19, 2005, 3:53 pm

nobody wrote:
Winnow wrote: It looks like I lost that one with my HD crash.
it's a cover-up!

Indubitably!

Skogen · Post by **Skogen** » October 20, 2005, 1:44 am

I remember seeing survellience camera images from the parking lot of the Pentagon showing the plane coming in & hitting. I saw this on CNN right after 911, but never saw it again since.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » October 20, 2005, 5:38 am

Skogen wrote:I remember seeing survellience camera images from the parking lot of the Pentagon showing the plane coming in & hitting. I saw this on CNN right after 911, but never saw it again since.

Here's an overlay of what the size of the plane should be and what you see in the picture:

Above is the clearest picture of the object approaching the Pentagon before impact and all you really see is the smoke trail and if the nose is acurate in the picture, it's about the size of an unmanned drone like one of these:

Here's the 2 hour video I posted awhile back analyzing the Pentagon and WTC attacks.

Before you download, be aware of the following:

-The video is put together by an amateur (test flies all over the screen and screen transition effects are out of control

-the narrator presents some very interesting scientific data but he also spins off into his own conspiracy theories...focus on what he discusses in scientific terms and ignore his own theories.

-the video is two hours long, about half deals with the Pentagon and half deals with the WTC towers. Some key points are made from 5-15 minutes into the video.

-deal with the goofy, sometimes annoying narrator, ignore his personal theories beyond the evidence, deal with the animated text and graphics that must have been done with a 19.99 video editor, and you'll get some good info out of this video.

-if you can't deal with the above, don't fucking download the video. You're wasting your time.

-Give the video about 5 minutes until the narrator starts getting into the evidence.

Analysis of the 911 Attack ~336mb

Moonwynd · Post by **Moonwynd** » October 20, 2005, 3:18 pm

http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » October 20, 2005, 3:51 pm

It is actually not debris inside that puzzled me at the time.. it was the complete lack of debris outside where it first hit the building.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » October 20, 2005, 4:37 pm

Moonwynd wrote:http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm

I can't see shit in those photos! Here's a fuzzy photo right back at you!

I honestly don't buy into a Global Hawk hitting the Pentagon but it's an interesting theory. You'd think that the government could easily provide more detail without giving away any secrets. There are enough questions surrounding the Pentagon plane crash that it warrants a little more info.

Did you watch the video by chance Moon?

Moonwynd · Post by **Moonwynd** » October 20, 2005, 4:49 pm

At work when I happened upon the link to your video today, Winnow. I will check it out this eve when I get home

Nick · Post by **Nick** » October 20, 2005, 9:46 pm

Very interesting video.

Personally however I find it obscene and disgusting anyone would doubt the veracity of the US Governments findings. It is beyond comprehension why anyone would think of questioning such a tragedy. It is unpatriotic and dare I say it, UnAmerican.

For shame you stinking liberals, why don't you go and pussy around some forest and hug some trees.

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » October 20, 2005, 10:57 pm

What kind of commercial aircraft punches a hole like that without even a hint of impact damage from wings?

http://www.rense.com/general32/fuselage ... C-027S.jpg

Versus the hole in WTC2

http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/janu ... woman1.jpg

Those are steel beams sheared off by aircraft wings, yet a 757 can enter the Pentagon w/o even marking up the bricks; perhaps they fold their wings back when they're diving like a swallow?

Boogahz · Post by **Boogahz** » October 20, 2005, 11:01 pm

Arthur: The swallow may fly south with the sun or the house martin or the plover may seek warmer climes in winter, yet these are not strangers to our land?
Soldier #1: Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?
Arthur: Not at all. They could be carried.
Soldier #1: What? A swallow carrying a coconut?
Arthur: It could grip it by the husk!
Soldier #1: It's not a question of where he grips it! It's a simple question of weight ratios! A five ounce bird could not carry a one pound coconut.
Arthur: Well, it doesn't matter. Will you go and tell your master that Arthur from the Court of Camelot is here?
Soldier #1: Listen. In order to maintain air-speed velocity, a swallow needs to beat its wings forty-three times every second, right?
Arthur: Please!
Soldier #1: Am I right?
Arthur: I'm not interested!
Soldier #2: It could be carried by an African swallow!
Soldier #1: Oh, yeah, an African swallow maybe, but not a European swallow. That's my point.
Soldier #2: Oh, yeah, I agree with that.
Arthur: Will you ask your master if he wants to join my court at Camelot?!
Soldier #1: But then of course a-- African swallows are non-migratory.
Soldier #2: Oh, yeah...
Soldier #1: So, they couldn't bring a coconut back anyway...
[clop clop clop]
Soldier #2: Wait a minute! Supposing two swallows carried it together?
Soldier #1: No, they'd have to have it on a line.
Soldier #2: Well, simple! They'd just use a strand of creeper!
Soldier #1: What, held under the dorsal guiding feathers?
Soldier #2: Well, why not?

VeeshanVault

9-11 pentagon photos

9-11 pentagon photos

Re: 9-11 pentagon photos

Re: 9-11 pentagon photos