As opposed to the US bombs killing more Iraqi civilians than insurgents?If it was that simple, you would be seeing Iraqi people retaliating against those people of non-Iraqi or even Iraqi nationality who have been using suicide bombing that kills more Iraqi civilians than coalition troops.
And like I said, how does one differentiate between innocent, civilian arabs (or if you like, Muslims) and those with ties to terrorist organizations?
I'm not siding with the terrorists, I'm just keeping an open mind and trying to understand both sides.
This isn't as cut and dry as good vs evil...
I wouldn't say weird... thier resolve is pretty admirable.Brits are weird people. And way more battletested in the form of terror than the US or any other European country. They are way hardier than a lot of people give them credit for.
They are a good lot and have faced a lot of challenges in thier history.
For certain these attacks won't have the same impact as the attacks on the US.
No kidding. It seemed most of them would have been more upset if thier favorite pub had been bombed.Even the ones that came out of the Underground breathing in smoke in a claustrophobic and helpless environment didn’t seem to pay much mind.
