Protesting? VIDEO INCLUDED

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » May 12, 2003, 3:09 am

http://download.consumptionjunction.com ... _20946.wmv

Takes awhile to load....give it a sec...2 megs to buffer.

Fash · Post by **Fash** » May 12, 2003, 3:10 am

damn straight.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » May 12, 2003, 6:27 am

wow what an intelligent argument you present.

Tegellan · Post by **Tegellan** » May 12, 2003, 7:25 am

OK, that one is pretty funny, very good argument, no kids for me

Boogahz · Post by **Boogahz** » May 12, 2003, 9:51 am

Nothing more f*cking annoying than embedding audio/video with no warning. Links would be even better than embedding WITH warning.

miir · Post by **miir** » May 12, 2003, 10:54 am

You deserve a puch right in the fucking face for embedding a video with sound.

Not to mention the fact that consumption junction is blocked by pretty much all content blockers. It's a porn laden site. I doubt people want to have it noted that they tried to access a porn site. That doesn't look good on audit.

Remove the fucking embedded video and link it with a *possible NWS* warning.... sheesh

Oreck · Post by **Oreck** » May 12, 2003, 11:27 am

Well apparently this is takeing to long to load.

It would proably be best to link this next time.

Post by **Xouqoa** » May 12, 2003, 11:57 am

miir wrote:You deserve a puch right in the fucking face for embedding a video with sound.

Not to mention the fact that consumption junction is blocked by pretty much all content blockers. It's a porn laden site. I doubt people want to have it noted that they tried to access a porn site. That doesn't look good on audit.

Remove the fucking embedded video and link it with a *possible NWS* warning.... sheesh

I removed the embed. We only really only enabled it for people with flash sigs. ><

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » May 12, 2003, 5:25 pm

The caps that said VIDEO INCLUDED in the subject line might have been a tip off to someone who can read.

But for all you that said I gave no warning....here is a message just for you.

I hope you choke on a cock, fags.

Stalker Vacio · Post by **Stalker Vacio** » May 12, 2003, 6:06 pm

...anyways... FUNNY ASS VIDEO!!!

miir · Post by **miir** » May 12, 2003, 6:33 pm

Pilsburry wrote:The caps that said VIDEO INCLUDED in the subject line might have been a tip off to someone who can read.

But for all you that said I gave no warning....here is a message just for you.

I hope you choke on a cock, fags.

Consumption Junction is a NWS site, asshole.
You think people want their lan admin seeing them trying to download a 2 meg file from a 'porn' site?

Use some fucking common sense.

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » May 12, 2003, 6:38 pm

Don't open a link that says in caps

VIDEO INCLUDED

And you won't have that problem.

Or hey, do you think your IT guys want you on VV period? Probably not...so if you don't want to get fired for internet mis-use...then get off VV.

Thanks and have a nice day.

Boogahz · Post by **Boogahz** » May 12, 2003, 7:13 pm

Video Included can mean a number of things doughboy. Saying Embedded Video would be another fucking thing entirely. . . or did you miss Searyx getting bitched at for his sig with embedded audio . . . or maybe you missed web design 101 which taught that the #1 killer of websites is embedding audio/video . . . or maybe that thing you missed it all around the balls dangling in front of your face.

Taking some requests/advice would be one thing. Flaming those requesting it is another.

Have a peachy fucking day.

Bubba Grizz · Post by **Bubba Grizz** » May 12, 2003, 7:14 pm

I think that would be a problem in the raising of the child as opposed to not using a raincoat.

Still funny to see.

As for the Video Included maybe it would have been better to say Video Embedded w/sound. I was expecting an article or statement along with a link to a video.

Toshira · Post by **Toshira** » May 12, 2003, 11:07 pm

Shh...Pils doesn't do anything wrong.

Sabek · Post by **Sabek** » May 13, 2003, 1:31 am

Toshira wrote:Shh...Pils doesn't do anything wrong.

And if he does he will post a 90 page reason why it wasn't wrong.

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » May 13, 2003, 1:38 am

1. Searyx didn't put caps "WITH SOUND" on all the subjects he posted on.

2. "WITH VIDEO" doesn't really mean any number of things, because noone would put that on there if it was a link.

3. When someone with a small penis like Miir tells me he should punch me in the face because his illiteracy problem caused an issue with him, then I will flame back...his suggestion wasn't a suggestion it was a fucking rude comment and was responded to in a like fashion.

4. Toshira, shut the fuck up. If you don't I'll open up the guns, but I will speak only truth. I hold back on flaming your ass when you instigate me every so often, but you can't hold your shit closed for even minor things like miirs illiteracy problem.

I wish I had 10 VV points for every fucked up thing I know about toshira.

Post by **Xouqoa** » May 13, 2003, 1:57 am

This thread has the potential to go for 20 pages.

BUT WILL IT?

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » May 13, 2003, 2:31 am

And just for the record Xouqoa....

If I had known it was policy not to embed video or sound, I would not have done it. Frankly it's easier to just put the link.

I just figured the big warning in caps was pretty obvious to readers here, all of whom seem to have some understanding of the english language. Unfortunately I forgot about the users who click first and wonder what the hell is going on second....never using thier brain first. I had some of those, I call them ex-employees.

I would have put NWS tag on it......but there is no cussing or nudity in it. The fact people would look up where the clip came from didn't really cross my mind because.....I have a home office, and when I had a regular office...we didn't do that stuff...I know because I would have been in charge of it. And if we had done internet logging etc....I would have busted them for any web use that was not work related, not just porn...that would include this forum even w/o porn.

However if it's in caps like that that it's a video you should refrain from opening it at work. That's what smart people do.

Boogahz · Post by **Boogahz** » May 13, 2003, 2:38 am

The WITH VIDEO means crap. That is the first time in ALL of the posts "with videos" that has been embedded. Most of the time I won't even download the video until I see what kind of response others have like The Spin Video that was posted in Current Events.

Now to actually address the video you posted...it was an interesting take on what several people probably think sometimes when a parent's kid is acting out in the store...I really don't see it doing too well in the US especially since you are "supposed" to teach abstinence...yeah, uh-huh, the kids will do that. Like the teen's parents didn't have sex when they were growing up. Hell, the guy in that commercial appeared to be a grown man though, and "of parenting age"...

Comedy factor would grab people's attention...but in the end...it leaves a bit of a sour taste.

Vetiria · Post by **Vetiria** » May 13, 2003, 10:38 am

You guys are running out of thing to argue about.

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » May 13, 2003, 12:41 pm

Yeah it's the first time "WITH VIDEO" meant embedded video...

It's also the first time in like 2 years of reading this forum I ever saw anyone put "WITH VIDEO" in the subject.

I tried to put it in red but it didn't look like HTML was going to work on the subject line because on the preview it just showed the HTML code not the red color.

--------------------------------------

As for your addressing the video...

I agree, we preach abstinance...fuck that...it's not going to happen...kids have been having sex since like we ran around in animal fur and lived in caves.

We need to take a strong stance on condoms, now I have seen some comercials here in the states that do address condoms more...generally condom commercials...but they usually stay on the cable channels..like MTV.

We spend how much money educating kids in africa about how to use condoms to prevent the spread of AIDS there (which is supossedly a 1 in 4 issue there)....screw that...our gov't won't address the issue of sex here really...and that's OUR money. Those africans won't use condoms...a condom probably cost them a months salary.....and they don't have shit to do there but have sex and die, they usually can't even eat.....the people who are affected by this aids campaign I mean.

So let thier Gov't handle the situation. We should handle our own. Shit the condom companies will advertise there soon enough anyway....they want to sell product and fear has always been an effective method of selling products.

Personally I'm more afraid of AIDS then a kid. I just thought it was funny how the kid protested to try and make his parents see his point of view...before the parent might not have known he wanted candy, but the child made him understand the problem via protesting, perhaps the father would agree with the childs concerns, or perhaps not....but it's most definately a valid way of getting what you want.

I don't even see why the father was getting upset. It's not like the kid was forcing him to buy the candy, he was merely forcing the knowledge of the probem on him. And it's every citizens right to protest correct?

miir · Post by **miir** » May 13, 2003, 12:51 pm

I've never seen anyone use so many words to say absolutely nothing.

Deward · Post by **Deward** » May 13, 2003, 12:51 pm

Nothing more annoying than a bratty kid. My momma would of bitch slapped me up and down the aisles and then locked me in the car. I would of gotten another beating when I got home.

Deward

Ennia · Post by **Ennia** » May 13, 2003, 2:28 pm

is that Boris Becker in that video? that 80's tennis champ?

let me just say also that I don't agree with the message in that clip, condoms have little to do with how you raise your kid

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » May 13, 2003, 6:25 pm

condoms take the fun outa it

more of a pill/ abortion man myself!!!

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » May 13, 2003, 7:37 pm

I gotta side with Pils on this one, I see in CAPS VIDEO INCLUDED and the link "http://download.consumptionjunction.com ... _20946.wmv "

even says consumptionjunction.com. But I see The Wonder Twins still open it and bitch at Pils because they flunked RIF.

Ennia · Post by **Ennia** » May 13, 2003, 8:32 pm

Cart, Xou stealthly replaced the embedded video with a link

It's the original form of Pils post that triggered complaints.

miir · Post by **miir** » May 14, 2003, 12:22 am

Yeah, was imbeded right into the post so that it opened 1.4 meg video with sound every time you opened the thread.

Pottamina · Post by **Pottamina** » May 14, 2003, 10:32 am

sweet video.. we need more posts like that to keep me occupied during 3rd period word processing class.. the last thing i wanna do is made a database for bit-byte computers.. vv is the own for this class

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » May 14, 2003, 11:51 am

Ennia wrote:Cart, Xou stealthly replaced the embedded video with a link

It's the original form of Pils post that triggered complaints.

Ahhhh, My bad