GM Logic

Sabek · Post by **Sabek** » April 10, 2003, 1:55 pm

No self jackassing Lotsa. That will make you go blind.

Jackass

Akaran_D · Post by **Akaran_D** » April 10, 2003, 2:02 pm

mmm. Day got better:

JACKASS LOTSA

That is all.

miir · Post by **miir** » April 10, 2003, 3:37 pm

Fesuni Chopsui · Post by **Fesuni Chopsui** » April 10, 2003, 5:13 pm

Sinfutura is a member of PE

However I can tell you, my own personal views, are quite different regarding Farstorm. Fovol you are correct - I made the call to back off when yall were heading to Klandicar and would have had it been any other guild racing towards Kland and had -beaten- us there. As for the PE/LoV/Farstorm thing that occured - what I can say on the matter is that PE was not in charge of the situation when it occured, in fact only one passive PE officer was present - and in fact if I what I was told is correct, PE was there in much smaller numbers. PE has no issue with Farstorm and vice versa - whatever issues LoV and Farstorm has please keep them SEPARATE from PE, since LoV and PE do not share the same viewpoint regarding Farstorm or any of its members.

PE was there the day of the incident - but, I can tell you now that we had nothing to do with any supposed "training" nor any flaming in /ooc nor much of any backtalk after the incident.

Drinsic Darkwood · Post by **Drinsic Darkwood** » April 10, 2003, 5:37 pm

Fesuni is right. PE had nothing to do with the training, and thus, AFAIK Farstorm has no strong opposition to PE. LoV on the other hand...

Tarrus alone trained FS at the AoW incident. No PE were involved, and we're not going to blame any. PE acted respectably from what I can tell, as they do not support LoV's actions. Our force was at AoW first and while we were starting to clear our way to statue.. before LoV had pulled anything.. there's a little red 'n black hobbit making a run straight for us. Lo and behold the name "Tarrus Freefinger" rests above his head. Boy, I sure was surprised

. Anyways, Tarrus managed to deliver about 7 or 8 mobs on us inluding protectors and priests, and while we killed them off with the several giants we already had, LoV took statue. Was it in intentional? Yes, it was. I'm sorry, but say whatever the hell you want, but a ROGUE does not run around vindi/statue area of kael, suddenly have "invis" break, run back out of the area, manage to run straight for the opposing guild, and stop and wait for his train to take aggro on that opposing guild, all by accident. It was intentional, Tarrus admitted to training, and several LoV members mocked FS about it. Sadly, their antics were for naught, as we did not whipe to the train, and we took back the mob that rightfully belonged to us in the first place.

PE was at no fault, I can say that myself as well~

noel · Post by **noel** » April 10, 2003, 5:49 pm

Thanks Sabek for the clarification.

Shaerra · Post by **Shaerra** » April 10, 2003, 6:51 pm

PE steamrolled me in Crushbone. I killed an_orc_centurion_073 to start the Emperor cycle, and then PE came and took Emperor Crush, so don't tell ME about how noble they are!

P.S. Fesuni trained me with orc pawns and taunted me in /ooc.

Sabek · Post by **Sabek** » April 10, 2003, 8:15 pm

Fesuni Chopsui wrote:Sinfutura is a member of PE

However I can tell you, my own personal views, are quite different regarding Farstorm. Fovol you are correct - I made the call to back off when yall were heading to Klandicar and would have had it been any other guild racing towards Kland and had -beaten- us there. As for the PE/LoV/Farstorm thing that occured - what I can say on the matter is that PE was not in charge of the situation when it occured, in fact only one passive PE officer was present - and in fact if I what I was told is correct, PE was there in much smaller numbers. PE has no issue with Farstorm and vice versa - whatever issues LoV and Farstorm has please keep them SEPARATE from PE, since LoV and PE do not share the same viewpoint regarding Farstorm or any of its members.

PE was there the day of the incident - but, I can tell you now that we had nothing to do with any supposed "training" nor any flaming in /ooc nor much of any backtalk after the incident.

Very well said Fesuni. I hope I wasn't unclear. I was trying to make sure the whole PE/LOV or LoVE crap didn't make it into this discussion. FS has had no issues with PE in the past.

Fesuni Chopsui · Post by **Fesuni Chopsui** » April 10, 2003, 8:21 pm

Nod Sabek

Cracc · Post by **Cracc** » April 13, 2003, 11:49 pm

Took back what was rightfully yours? Have you been eating to much wallcandy lately Drinsic?

It's no secret that us killing aow had been irritating the shit out of you for a long time, and it was kind of obvious you were obsessing since you were on every aow killing we had, he'll even some of your former guildies that doesnt have much

for you told me you were hellbent on getting the next AoW before we were able to get to it ( Not that we even tried this time. ). Even your dear guildleader has supposedly admitted that FS did an outright spawn cycle breaking and thus ksing, and that it shouldnt be done again. Im pretty sure i can get the whole post from the thread posted here if you want proof.

And man Drinsic? Wtf happend to you, you used to be a nice guy, but you turned into walking shit like over a night. Spamming our boards after beeing banned originally for accessing officer accounts you shouldnt have access to, switching ips and reregistering, spying on our guildchat with old alt and stale chars you still had access to, man thats some really inane shit.

And if you want to discuss Tarrus maturity, well i even remember you shooting me a tell out of the blue giving me the http://fovol.ionichost.com adress that supposedly fovol had done, now thats some immature shit.

Fesuni Chopsui · Post by **Fesuni Chopsui** » April 14, 2003, 12:00 am

Sabek · Post by **Sabek** » April 14, 2003, 12:12 am

Cracc just can't get enough.

He just has to put on the crash helmet and take a ride on the short yellow bus again.

Geez fucking drop it already you useless waste of air.

Cracc · Post by **Cracc** » April 14, 2003, 12:19 am

Atleast i fill my posts with actual content instead of hurling baboon shit and resorting to namecalling like a five year old kid with downs symdrome.

Fovol · Post by **Fovol** » April 14, 2003, 12:34 am

Cracc wrote:Atleast i fill my posts with actual content instead of hurling baboon shit and resorting to namecalling like a five year old kid with downs symdrome.

Sure ya don't.

Cracc · Post by **Cracc** » April 14, 2003, 12:44 am

Fovol wrote:
Cracc wrote:Atleast i fill my posts with actual content instead of hurling baboon shit and resorting to namecalling like a five year old kid with downs symdrome.
Sure ya don't.

Main Entry: name-call·ing
Pronunciation: 'nAm-"ko-li[ng]
Function: noun
Date: 1853
: the use of offensive names especially to win an argument or to induce rejection or condemnation (as of a person or project) without objective consideration of the facts

Geez fucking drop it already you useless waste of air.

Atleast i fill my posts with actual content instead of hurling baboon shit and resorting to namecalling like a five year old kid with downs symdrome.

See the very subtle diffrence little friend? Or is reading comprehension not one of your better skills?

Legenae · Post by **Legenae** » April 14, 2003, 12:45 am

For the love of God AssCracc, let this thread die!

Spangaloid_PE · Post by **Spangaloid_PE** » April 14, 2003, 12:47 am

this is not the feel good thread of the summer

Fovol · Post by **Fovol** » April 14, 2003, 12:59 am

I think I'll have to resort to name calling.

Cracc, are you stupid?

Main Entry: name-call·ing
Pronunciation: 'nAm-"ko-li[ng]
Function: noun
Date: 1853
: the use of offensive names especially to win an argument or to induce rejection or condemnation (as of a person or project) without objective consideration of the facts

Considering you have no knowledge of mine or Sabek's mental capacity, that statement would infact be used to induce rejection or condemnation without objective consideration of the facts. I do believe, they are the same thing. Sure, you used an analogous statement, but it doesn't change the fact that it was used to do what the definition describes.

Fovol · Post by **Fovol** » April 14, 2003, 1:09 am

Spangaloid_PE wrote:this is not the feel good thread of the summer

I disagree, this has to be one of the best comedies lately. The "Thanks Drinsic" thread was up there, as well, thanks to our star comedian, Cracc.