Should the games go on?
Moderator: TheMachine
Should the games go on?
There has been a lot of discussion wether or not NCAA tournament should go on. Personally, I strongly feel that the games should go on. The soldiers in the gulf use sports as a distraction, when you hear them talk they WANT the games to go on and want to know who are playing/winning etc.
Another very strong argument for me: If you change your lifestyle too much due to terrorism/war the terrorists have won.
By letting the games go on you do NOT show disrespect to the soldiers or what they are fighting for. Locking yourself away in your home will NOT help any matter whatsoever.
Please, let the games go on. Do not stop living.
Another very strong argument for me: If you change your lifestyle too much due to terrorism/war the terrorists have won.
By letting the games go on you do NOT show disrespect to the soldiers or what they are fighting for. Locking yourself away in your home will NOT help any matter whatsoever.
Please, let the games go on. Do not stop living.
- Xouqoa
- Way too much time!

- Posts: 4106
- Joined: July 2, 2002, 5:49 pm
- Gender: Mangina
- XBL Gamertag: Xouqoa
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact:
Better not interrupt the NHL Playoffs either! ><
edit: now = not
edit: now = not
Last edited by Xouqoa on March 19, 2003, 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings." - John F Kennedy
- Gurugurumaki
- Way too much time!

- Posts: 1061
- Joined: October 25, 2002, 4:15 pm
- Kilmoll the Sexy
- Super Poster!

- Posts: 5295
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 3:31 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: bunkeru2k
- Location: Ohio
Report was that some of the games were going to be broadcast on ESPN instead of TNN (at least I think it was TNN) if the war had started so they could cover it. I didn't catch the whole bit and am fuzzy about which station it was that was going to give up games on their network, but its broadcasters would still be doing the games....just showing them on ESPN instead. That is big dollars being given away and would actually be the right thing to do.
but here is the deal:
Disney already has plenty of channels to show news on (ABC affiliates). They can have the whole spectrum of viewers if they have the games on ESPN.
The flipside is that Viacom needs to run their news on their flagship network, CBS. So they either have to put the sports on TNN (most people will be like wtf is that) or MTV (not regularly identified with sports).
If ESPN does pickup the games, they will still be produced by CBS Sports. The graphics and everything will still be CBS'. I'm not sure what sort of deal they are going to make on advertising, but i wouldnt be surprised if ESPN didnt really care if they got a dollar, as long as they got a little bit of time to promote their shows from the time that CBS had slated to promote CBS shows.
Disney already has plenty of channels to show news on (ABC affiliates). They can have the whole spectrum of viewers if they have the games on ESPN.
The flipside is that Viacom needs to run their news on their flagship network, CBS. So they either have to put the sports on TNN (most people will be like wtf is that) or MTV (not regularly identified with sports).
If ESPN does pickup the games, they will still be produced by CBS Sports. The graphics and everything will still be CBS'. I'm not sure what sort of deal they are going to make on advertising, but i wouldnt be surprised if ESPN didnt really care if they got a dollar, as long as they got a little bit of time to promote their shows from the time that CBS had slated to promote CBS shows.
- Bubba Grizz
- Super Poster!

- Posts: 6121
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:52 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin
