Sionistic/Tibble

Gung · Post by **Gung** » March 9, 2003, 12:22 pm

Sionistic/Tibble:

I noticed you attacked me on Monkly Business. You insulted me, called me a liar, and said a whole pile of degrading things without foundation.
I'm just wondering why you did that. Did CT reject your application at some point, or something?

I noticed in your post that you were a Veeshan player. And when I was reading Veeshan Vault here this morning at work -- I read Veeshan vault and monkly business, still, even tho I stopped playing in december -- I also noticed you posted here.

So I figured we could continue our discussion here. This arena is more suited to personal attacks than Monkly Business in *my* opinion, at least.

But anyways, to the part about calling me a liar and such. Hey, I've been playing Gung since June 2000, with a brief vacation here and there. I'm a real long time monk, not a monkly business troller who's only played for 2 months lol. Most people around here can vouch for the truth of that.

I can assure you Gung is sitting in cancelled status, as I had said, until SOE rebalances melee or re-tunes the nerf, so that I may enjoy playing again.

Gung Fumaster
Retired (til they fix monks at least)

Kguku · Post by **Kguku** » March 9, 2003, 12:36 pm

Who cares?

Gung · Post by **Gung** » March 9, 2003, 12:48 pm

Well Sherlock, *I* care. If I didn't I wouldn't have brought it up.

Are you that fucking stupid?

Was this post even directed at you?

Is your name Sionistic?

Some people's children.

Kguku · Post by **Kguku** » March 9, 2003, 12:58 pm

Why do you bring a flame fest from another board here?

Does this make you cool?

Are you a big fucktard?

Are you looking for some hugs and condolances because this person hurt your feelings?

Do people really care what someone said to you on Monkly-Business? Which I might add is a forum that turned to shit years ago.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » March 9, 2003, 12:59 pm

Gung is Canadian.

Gung · Post by **Gung** » March 9, 2003, 1:03 pm

Hey, cockwobbler, you didn't answer my question. Was this directed to you?

Kindly go suck a dick, ya fucking nutsore.

And to answer your barrage of questions: This is Veeshan Vault. If 2 Veeshan people are gonna have it out on a message board, this is the fucking place -- not Monkly Business.

One more question- Does gargling all that cum actually make your teeth whiter?

Cumguzzling douchebag retard snowball queen. Go troll another post, this ain't about you.

- Gung

Kguku · Post by **Kguku** » March 9, 2003, 1:09 pm

Generally when you start a flame on another board, you keep it there, not migrate it to other sites on the internet. But I guess that stupidity reigns supreme in your life, and you are the king of it.

I wouldn't know about cum gargling, but your theory on making it a teeth whitener is maybe something you should follow up on. It seems you are drawn to the mansex ways with those comments.

I hope you have a nice day of crawling to your friends for emotional comfort because you got flamed on another site. Oh boo hoo, mommy, I need a hug because someone on a board said bad words to me.

Gung · Post by **Gung** » March 9, 2003, 1:19 pm

Genius - Monkly Business is not a 'flame vault'. The flaming did not even suit the topic of the thread.

I have as much right to a thread here as you do. This thread, I was hoping, could explain why Sionistic got on with all that crap on Monkly-Business.

If, as you so humbly suggest, I had continued this "why did you flame me" thread on Monkly-Business, it would have been insta-locked cause -- as *I* have said multiple times -- that kinda stuff is not generally permissable on that board.

Why are you even talking to me? Are you another one of Sionistic's accounts or something? If I ask you nicely to troll someone else's posts, and leave this one to Sionistic and I, would you?

That would be really swell.

Mainlanders. /sigh

Gung

Krimson Klaw · Post by **Krimson Klaw** » March 9, 2003, 1:43 pm

If this was a private matter that no one else is allowed to comment on, why not send a PM?

Canelek · Post by **Canelek** » March 9, 2003, 1:48 pm

Cockwobbler, lol. I don't know why, but that is pretty funny.

Kguku · Post by **Kguku** » March 9, 2003, 1:52 pm

As Krimson stated, if you really did not want anyone else posting their opinion on this, you would have kept it private to begin with.

You coming here and starting up a flame which started on another board, simply because you felt you shouldn't flame there, kind of implies that you are a drama queen, and seeking some much needed attention.

As for being being one of 'Sionistics' accounts, I really have no fuckin clue who he is, nor do I care. I just think it's rather retarded of you to bring a flame from another domain to here and, holy shit sherlock, since you put this as a public post, I can 'troll' it all I like.

Besides, after seeing Voro hit 2000 posts, I need to start farming so he doesn't get 10x ahead of me.

Gung · Post by **Gung** » March 9, 2003, 2:01 pm

Krimson: Good idea.

Kguku: I'm continuing a flame someone else started, cause it's not suited to monkly-business. And I never even noticed the PM option on veeshanvault before.

I also don't have to account for how I choose to procede on this to a choda tugging arsegoblin like yourself.

Did I ask for your opinion, even once? Even one time?

Balls balls, teabag my balls...

- Gung

Atokal · Post by **Atokal** » March 9, 2003, 2:10 pm

Kguku wrote:Generally when you start a flame on another board, you keep it there, not migrate it to other sites on the internet. But I guess that stupidity reigns supreme in your life, and you are the king of it.

I wouldn't know about cum gargling, but your theory on making it a teeth whitener is maybe something you should follow up on. It seems you are drawn to the mansex ways with those comments.

I hope you have a nice day of crawling to your friends for emotional comfort because you got flamed on another site. Oh boo hoo, mommy, I need a hug because someone on a board said bad words to me.

Just a question there Lord of the Internet... Who the fuck ever told you that it was poor form to migrate flames to a more applicable site?

Let em have their fight and some suggested reading might be found right under the General Forum thread. No Holds Barred anything goes etc etc.

Cheers

Drakoslay123 · Post by **Drakoslay123** » March 9, 2003, 2:30 pm

Hi GunGster. This is Drako.

Gung · Post by **Gung** » March 9, 2003, 2:35 pm

Drakoslay!

Hope things are going well bro.

/love

Gung

Sionistic · Post by **Sionistic** » March 9, 2003, 2:52 pm

you know how sad this sounds right?

Gung · Post by **Gung** » March 9, 2003, 2:54 pm

Sion:

Yeah dude, tell me about it. Why'd you jump me so bad on Monkly Business?

Sionistic · Post by **Sionistic** » March 9, 2003, 2:58 pm

ok thats it listen, im gonna send you a pm and then im no longer replying to this because its getting fucking annoying

Gung · Post by **Gung** » March 9, 2003, 3:01 pm

Sounds good

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » March 9, 2003, 3:06 pm

Bullshit! Enquiring minds want to know.

Gung · Post by **Gung** » March 9, 2003, 3:34 pm

Bah the gist of it is that I proposed monks should cancel their accounts as a form of protest -- protesting the fact that altho SOE said they would revisit the monk nerf, and they would re-tune melee, they haven't done shit (or even mentioned shit) in more months than I can remember.

I went on to say that they are more likely to pay attention to 40,000 cancelled accounts, say, than 40,000 whining posts. That it all came down to dollars and cents.

Since I was not the first person to think of this, since my total post count did not exceed 20, and since I was among a handful of people who already posted on this subject recently, dude tore into me about being a troller/liar etc etc and so forth.

I didn't appreciate the unprovoked flame. The thread was since locked, at any rate. I just wanted to know why he tore into me. He's since PM'd me with his explanation ( no apology, which is fine ) and I didn't think it held any water. I just think *he's* the angry troller. One of those types that flames 'newcomers' (non avid posters) to try and get a reaction out of the crowd.

"Oh Sionistic, you are the greatest! Way to put that n00b in his place!"

etc.

Well it's been a slice. Back to work.

/s3xx0r Kilmoll

Gung

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » March 9, 2003, 5:37 pm

Retired (til they fix monks at least)

Waaah.

Zamtuk · Post by **Zamtuk** » March 9, 2003, 6:08 pm

This could get good.

Hammerstalker PE · Post by **Hammerstalker PE** » March 9, 2003, 6:26 pm

Monks are fine there is no need to fix em.

Canelek · Post by **Canelek** » March 9, 2003, 8:10 pm

Every class has its share of whiney bitches....

Mawafu · Post by **Mawafu** » March 9, 2003, 8:29 pm

Monks are fine there is no need to fix em.

oh shit, what is this world coming to?? I agree with Hammer!

Anuin · Post by **Anuin** » March 9, 2003, 10:32 pm

Mawafu wrote:
Monks are fine there is no need to fix em.
oh shit, what is this world coming to?? I agree with Hammer!

Take it back! Take it back!

Knibble · Post by **Knibble** » March 9, 2003, 10:51 pm

Gung seems to have a ball fettish

Zamtuk · Post by **Zamtuk** » March 9, 2003, 10:56 pm

Zamtuk wrote:This could get good.

Christ, was I wrong.

Maddux · Post by **Maddux** » March 10, 2003, 5:55 am

Do all Monks Have Man sex fettishes?

I mean, more and more lately I find the ones that threaten RL violence or describe vivid Guy guy action happen to either be Monks, or Ann Rice.

And not to get off subject, but Wow reading that stuff makes me blush. And Im a prancer

Xyun · Post by **Xyun** » March 10, 2003, 6:46 am

Gung,

Anyone who quits EQ because of a nerf to their character is well... stupid. Nerfs are new obstacles to be overcome, not barriers that you cannot get past. Regardless of whatever nerf it is you are crying about, your attitude is horrible.

Aaeamdar · Post by **Aaeamdar** » March 10, 2003, 7:06 am

What makes a better monk - Human or Iksar?

This is Monkley Business, right?

Sabek · Post by **Sabek** » March 10, 2003, 9:01 am

Gnome monk > all others

Bubba Grizz · Post by **Bubba Grizz** » March 10, 2003, 11:57 am

Monks should never have been a class in the first place. The only reason there are monks in this game is because there were monks in the game EQ was patterened after, Sojourn, a text based mud.

Personally I feel that Monks, in this setting, should be more like the monks of medieval Europe. The Fryer Tuck kind of monks.

As long as I am typing I may as well state that I don't believe Good Races and Evil Races should be allowed to group. I feel that this was done to make it more of a friendly game so more people would play. But that is a whole other topic.

As far as this thread goes, hell, as far as this site goes, all flames should be welcomed from wherever they originate. It is this kind of drama that keeps people like me happy at work with something to read. Who cares if they come off as whiners or crusaders. PM's should be for personal shit. Flames should be in the open for all to enjoy.

.02

Ennia · Post by **Ennia** » March 10, 2003, 12:12 pm

This thread is missing a reference to that Monkly Business topic.

And I think it's hillarious every time there's some nerf, there's always someone gathering some mass protests and walk outs/cancellations

Yeah this thread can still get good, just someone link the source of all this please.

vn_Tanc · Post by **vn_Tanc** » March 10, 2003, 1:27 pm

Whether you started playing in 2000, 1999, 1970 or 1865, if you retired your monk due to the AC nerf you're a fuckin newbie. Probably a gimp too. Maybe we should have a vote

masteen · Post by **masteen** » March 10, 2003, 2:00 pm

Monks were nerfed?

Aslanna · Post by **Aslanna** » March 10, 2003, 2:06 pm

Monks should never have been a class in the first place. The only reason there are monks in this game is because there were monks in the game EQ was patterened after, Sojourn, a text based mud.

What 'should never have' doesn't matter since it obviously has.

Voronwë · Post by **Voronwë** » March 10, 2003, 2:08 pm

now it is possible for a monk to actually die on a pull. what has this game come to...

masteen · Post by **masteen** » March 10, 2003, 2:34 pm

So they still have FD, block, and the ability to triple the DPS of a comparable warrior, but because they now get hit harder, monks are supposed to boycott?

Cry me a river...

Fallanthas · Post by **Fallanthas** » March 10, 2003, 2:37 pm

That's what I was thinking, Mast.

Parses in the last two weeks put our two best monks at well over 100 DPS. Not a whole lot there to bitch about.

Sionistic · Post by **Sionistic** » March 10, 2003, 5:31 pm

you see thats the thing, you dont hear any of the high lvl monks bitching. The board is mainly composed of mid lvl monks. Even thou i frequent there OMGIAMRETARDEDCAUSEALOTISTWOWORDS I have yet to really take the nerf to heart. I still do decent damage. I can still pull. Hell i've tanked a few giants in bot/pos when the tank died. I'm still having fun on my monk, as long as im having fun, i couldnt give a fuck what soe does.

Post by **Xouqoa** » March 10, 2003, 5:40 pm

Gung wrote:Bah the gist of it is that I proposed monks should cancel their accounts as a form of protest -- protesting the fact that altho SOE said they would revisit the monk nerf, and they would re-tune melee, they haven't done shit (or even mentioned shit) in more months than I can remember.

Just wait till BoTB tournaments roll around again and then cast your mana spell on your opponent and DMF the GM. Er... nm.

*twitches*