OMG!!! The Found Sadam's Arsenal (ITS War)

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » February 5, 2003, 10:20 am

http://www.backyardartillery.com/machinegun/

Fairweather Pure · Post by **Fairweather Pure** » February 5, 2003, 10:31 am

I really don't think that's against any of the UN regulated rules that were set forth years ago. However, if they find a potatoe gun, we really have no other choice except for a full nuclear, pre-emptive strike.

Midnyte_Ragebringer · February 5, 2003, 10:48 am

Fairweather Pure wrote:I really don't think that's against any of the UN regulated rules that were set forth years ago. However, if they find a potatoe gun, we really have no other choice except for a full nuclear, pre-emptive strike.

LMAO

Lor · Post by **Lor** » February 5, 2003, 10:57 am

Hahahaha, office weaponry!!!

masteen · Post by **masteen** » February 5, 2003, 11:30 am

Weapons of mass distraction found! Mother bitch!

Burke · Post by **Burke** » February 5, 2003, 12:13 pm

If he is using the extra wide rubber bands on that thing, then it is time to throw down.

Sabek · Post by **Sabek** » February 5, 2003, 12:40 pm

I would definitely call 144 rubberbands on a full reload mass distruction.
Hell if you hit them all in the eye you could take out 144 people before reloading.

Pherr the Dorf · Post by **Pherr the Dorf** » February 5, 2003, 2:53 pm

Sabek wrote:I would definitely call 144 rubberbands on a full reload mass distruction.
Hell if you hit them all in the eye you could take out 144 people before reloading.

Or blind 77 people in both eyes

Sabek · Post by **Sabek** » February 5, 2003, 3:02 pm

Pherr the Dorf wrote:
Sabek wrote:I would definitely call 144 rubberbands on a full reload mass distruction.
Hell if you hit them all in the eye you could take out 144 people before reloading.
Or blind 77 people in both eyes

Hehe. There will need to be some government research into the effectiveness of a person with one eye vs. totally blind. Perhaps taking out one eye is enough to throw off depth perception and render them an ineffective combatant.

Braxter · Post by **Braxter** » February 6, 2003, 3:43 am

Pherr the Dorf wrote:
Sabek wrote:I would definitely call 144 rubberbands on a full reload mass distruction.
Hell if you hit them all in the eye you could take out 144 people before reloading.
Or blind 77 people in both eyes

http://www.calculator.com/

Ebumar · Post by **Ebumar** » February 6, 2003, 4:48 am

"Perhaps taking out one eye is enough to throw off depth perception and render them an ineffective combatant."

AFK... putting out an eye so I don't get drafted...

Masekle · Post by **Masekle** » February 6, 2003, 5:25 am

Ebumar wrote:"Perhaps taking out one eye is enough to throw off depth perception and render them an ineffective combatant."

AFK... putting out an eye so I don't get drafted...

Damn thats a hell of a price to pay.

Wouldnt you rather keep both your eyes. And entertain the idea that you may get to blast the hell out of a couple-three or four Rag-heads, from around the corner, with a million dollar smart suit/weapon?

I know I would=)