An interesting question that's never really been given enough space to be highlighted, predominantly because the media find it inconvenient. Whether you agree or disagree with the invasion of Iraq I think this is still a pretty important question.In his new memoir, “What Happened,” Scott McClellan, the former White House press secretary, said the national news media neglected their watchdog role in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, calling reporters “complicit enablers” of the Bush administration’s push for war.
Skip to next paragraph
Virginia Sherwood/NBC Universal
Meredith Vieira on the “Today” program on NBC with Scott McClellan, who calls reporters “enablers” of the push for war.
Surprisingly, some prominent journalists have agreed.
Katie Couric, the anchor of “CBS Evening News,” said on Wednesday that she had felt pressure from government officials and corporate executives to cast the war in a positive light.
Speaking on “The Early Show” on CBS, Ms. Couric said the lack of skepticism shown by journalists about the Bush administration’s case for war amounted to “one of the most embarrassing chapters in American journalism.” She also said she sensed pressure from “the corporations who own where we work and from the government itself to really squash any kind of dissent or any kind of questioning of it.” At the time, Ms. Couric was a host of “Today” on NBC.
Another broadcast journalist also weighed in. Jessica Yellin, who worked for MSNBC in 2003 and now reports for CNN, said on Wednesday that journalists had been “under enormous pressure from corporate executives, frankly, to make sure that this was a war presented in a way that was consistent with the patriotic fever in the nation.”
On Thursday, she clarified her comments in a blog post, writing that her producers at MSNBC had wanted their coverage to reflect the patriotic mood of the country.
A spokeswoman for General Electric, which owns NBC and MSNBC through its division NBC Universal, declined to speak about the specifics of the comments but said, “General Electric has never, and will never, interfere in the editorial process at NBC News.”
The opinions of Ms. Couric and Ms. Yellin were hardly universal among journalists. Ms. Couric made her comments in an unusual on-camera tour of network morning programs — along with her two evening news competitors, Brian Williams of “NBC Nightly News” and Charles Gibson of “World News” on ABC — to promote a cancer research telethon.
“I think the questions were asked,” Mr. Gibson, who was a host of “Good Morning America” before the war began, said in response to Ms. Couric. “It was just a drumbeat of support from the administration. It is not our job to debate them. It is our job to ask the questions.”
Mr. Williams, who was an anchor on MSNBC at the time, emphasized the climate of “post-9/11 America.” In the early days of the war, he said, he would hear from the Pentagon “the minute they heard us report something they didn’t like.”
For five years, antiwar activists and media critics have claimed that the national news media failed to keep the White House accountable before the invasion. Andrew Heyward, who headed CBS News in 2003, said in an interview on Thursday that the trauma of the Sept. 11 attacks and the ensuing sense of patriotism might have muted press skepticism about the war.
Greg Mitchell, the author of “So Wrong for So Long,” a book about press and presidential failures on the war, argues that some media organizations have yet to come to terms with their role. Even at the fifth anniversary of the war last March, he said, “in the orgy of coverage of what had happened, there was almost no media self-assessment.”
NBC and CBS would not make executives available for interviews on the subject. Jon Banner, the executive producer of “World News” on ABC, said the news media should not be treated as a monolith.
“Were there questions we would have liked to ask?” Mr. Banner said. “Sure, but we were very critical of the administration and paid a significant price for it. It’s absurd and incorrect to lump us all together.”
I think one of the things that was so annoying and infuriating about the run up to the Iraq war was the total lack of real journalism that accompanied the run up in the preceding months. Not one top level journalist in the UK did their job and presumably the same applies to the US, if this article is anything to go by.
There was a distinct lack of open dialogue about the concept of the invasion, it became buried beneath pro war talking heads and frantic governmental actions to plead the case without ever accepting the answer of "no" from anyone who had the balls to ask, which was rare.
There was imo an unforgiveable degree of cowardice by journalists in the run up to the Iraq war. What do you reckon?
