CNN : Breaking news

miir · Post by **miir** » November 7, 2006, 6:42 pm

Britney Spears files for divorce from her husband Kevin Federline, citing irreconcilable differences....

*GASP*

Traz-KOE · Post by **Traz-KOE** » November 7, 2006, 6:45 pm

She listened to his album.

Animalor · Post by **Animalor** » November 7, 2006, 6:52 pm

ROFL. Didn't see that one coming at all.

Post by **Sylvus** » November 7, 2006, 7:01 pm

If those two can't keep their storybook romance together, how can there be any hope for the rest of us??

Funkmasterr · Post by **Funkmasterr** » November 7, 2006, 10:24 pm

Traz-KOE wrote:She listened to his album.

Soreali · Post by **Soreali** » November 8, 2006, 12:46 am

single milf LFG.. she'll start dating John Cena next..

Arborealus · Post by **Arborealus** » November 8, 2006, 12:51 am

Soreali wrote:single milf LFG.. she'll start dating John Cena next..

ermmmm not a MILF in my book...

Soreali · Post by **Soreali** » November 8, 2006, 12:57 am

eh... id still hit it.. just to say i did.. maybe then i could pull a k-fed and get some of her millions for doing nothing

Truant · Post by **Truant** » November 8, 2006, 1:36 am

Soreali wrote:eh... id still hit it.. just to say i did.. maybe then i could pull a k-fed and get some of her millions for doing nothing

the only thing he gets btw, is half of the house. she pegged his ass with a prenup.

Sabek · Post by **Sabek** » November 8, 2006, 1:56 am

He gets half of the double-wide?

Waran · Post by **Waran** » November 8, 2006, 4:15 am

Word is when she saw his "appearances" on WWE programming she laughed all the way to her lawyer.

Wulfran · Post by **Wulfran** » November 8, 2006, 3:34 pm

Saw a description I thought was funny "K-Fed to be Fed-Ex"

Lalanae · Post by **Lalanae** » November 8, 2006, 11:34 pm

This article made me laugh...several times...especially the part where the writer refers to him as an "aspiring rapper," instead of just "rapper" LOL

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061109/ap_ ... rs_divorce

A day after Britney Spears filed divorce papers, Kevin Federline counter-filed court papers Wednesday seeking sole custody of the couple's two children.

The former backup dancer and aspiring rapper is also seeking spousal support. He says the couple's community assets are "uncertain," though Spears said in her divorce papers there were none to speak of, suggesting the two had a prenuptial agreement in place.

"Kevin is prepared to go the distance in order to do what he feels is necessary to protect and safeguard the children and will not be intimidated or dissuaded from pursuit of those goals," said Michael Sands, spokesman for Federline's attorney, Mark Vincent Kaplan.

What a piece of garbage.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » November 9, 2006, 12:10 am

I think their children should be taken away and given to Michael Jackson so they at least have a small chance at growing up a normal person.

Kaldaur · Post by **Kaldaur** » November 9, 2006, 12:13 am

Hahahahah Kyo

Truant · Post by **Truant** » November 9, 2006, 1:15 am

reported deals of the prenup, stolen from another site.

- K-Fed won’t touch a penny of Britney’s money. All the millions belonging to Britney will stay that way.
- The mansion will be divided 50/50.
- Any gift given worth over $10,000 will go back to the original purchaser. This includes a custom-built motorcycle Brit gave K-Fed for Christmas 2 years ago.
- She will still support him for a little while longer. Brit will pay Kevin $30,000 a month for the period of time that is half the length of their marriage.
- Spears won’t pay child support. Federline is still responsible for supporting his other two children with previous baby momma Shar Jackson.

also mentioned is a further clarification on the gift line. Irregardless of who gave who what, it was paid for by Brittney, heh...so she gets it all back.

There's also speculation that it's all just a publicity stunt on Brittney's part.

miir · Post by **miir** » November 9, 2006, 12:08 pm

Irregardless

Boogahz · Post by **Boogahz** » November 9, 2006, 12:47 pm

miir wrote:
Irregardless

Vaemas · Post by **Vaemas** » November 9, 2006, 1:00 pm

I'm very disappointed in Truat.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » November 9, 2006, 1:37 pm

Irregardless is an acceptable word unless you are writing a formal letter. Look it up!

Post by **Sylvus** » November 9, 2006, 1:44 pm

It shouldn't be! Regardless means "without concern". Irrespective means the same thing, and is the antonym of Respective, indicating that the "ir" prefix is one of negation. Irregardless should then be the negation of "without concern", which is the exact opposite of its intended meaning.

And this isn't an attack on Truant, I know he knows that, and that it's just a slip when typing quickly. I have been guilty of the same crime on more than one occasion.

vn_Tanc · Post by **vn_Tanc** » November 9, 2006, 1:49 pm

kyoukan wrote:Irregardless is an acceptable word unless you are writing a formal letter. Look it up!

Not in the People's Republic of Tancistan, it ain't!

miir · Post by **miir** » November 9, 2006, 3:52 pm

kyoukan wrote:Irregardless is an acceptable word unless you are writing a formal letter. Look it up!

Yea, just like nook-u-lur is an acceptable pronunciation of nuclear... and rediculous is an acceptable spelling of ridiculous.

Vaemas · Post by **Vaemas** » November 9, 2006, 4:08 pm

OMGIAMRETARDEDCAUSEALOTISTWOWORDS!

redeemed · Post by **redeemed** » November 9, 2006, 4:50 pm

miir wrote:Yea, just like nook-u-lur is an acceptable pronunciation of nuclear... and rediculous is an acceptable spelling of ridiculous.

what? I've always spelled it as rediculous, I didn't even know about the "i" version.. weirdyo

Animalor · Post by **Animalor** » November 9, 2006, 6:39 pm

You mean it's not spelled reeddickyoulous.

Hookd on foniks werked for mee.

Truant · Post by **Truant** » November 9, 2006, 7:31 pm

Holy shit.

Let me start by apologizing profusely for unintentionally subjecting those of you from higher social classes to the casual language of us low born unfortunates who live across the tracks.

On the other hand, I'm sure you and your cronies had a terrific chortle when you related the story of the poor, dumb fool and his horrid butchering of your exquisite language.

Honestly, I didn't even think about it. Upon further review I see that the word I chose is sort of a term that contradicts itself, and for that I sincerely apologize. I hope the trauma was minimal.

Anyways, I'm off the reconnoiter the premises for beer.

Cheerio.

Gemily · Post by **Gemily** » November 9, 2006, 8:31 pm

kyoukan wrote:I think their children should be taken away and given to Michael Jackson so they at least have a small chance at growing up a normal person.

Oh Dear!

Nick · Post by **Nick** » November 9, 2006, 8:50 pm

I think their children should be taken away and given to Michael Jackson so they at least have a small chance at growing up a normal person.

Possibly the best post of the year so far tbh.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » November 9, 2006, 11:56 pm

miir wrote:
kyoukan wrote:Irregardless is an acceptable word unless you are writing a formal letter. Look it up!
Yea, just like nook-u-lur is an acceptable pronunciation of nuclear... and rediculous is an acceptable spelling of ridiculous.

I am looking hard for nook-u-lar and rediculous in merriam webster and I don't see it. But look, there is irregardless.

Drinsic Darkwood · Post by **Drinsic Darkwood** » November 10, 2006, 1:09 am

Cool, but that doesn't change the fact that it doesn't make sense.

"Ain't" is in the dictionary, too, but it's still fucking wrong.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » November 10, 2006, 1:13 am

There is nothing "wrong" about it. Languages grow and new words are added. Ain't is a contraction that everyone who speaks english knows what it means.

If languages never grew or expanded or matured then we'd all still be talking like fucking Hamlet.

Drinsic Darkwood · Post by **Drinsic Darkwood** » November 10, 2006, 1:19 am

Going by that argument, irregardless is actually a step in the opposite direction. The word is longer than regardless, contains an extra syllable, and serves no new purpose in the language other than to clutter and possibly confuse those who think logically.

Most of the evolution in our language since the Renaissance has been to simplify, not to complicate.

redeemed · Post by **redeemed** » November 10, 2006, 1:25 am

word fites r kool

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » November 10, 2006, 1:31 am

kyoukan wrote:There is nothing "wrong" about it. Languages grow and new words are added. Ain't is a contraction that everyone who speaks english knows what it means.

If languages never grew or expanded or matured then we'd all still be talking like fucking Hamlet.

Hamlet was an emo fag.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » November 10, 2006, 1:44 am

Drinsic Darkwood wrote:Going by that argument, irregardless is actually a step in the opposite direction.

Oh, I'm not arguing. I'm merely stating a fact. I'm also stating a fact when I say that it's in the dictionary, and thus a word. If you're looking for an argument, maybe merriam or webster will want to hash it out with you.

Zaelath wrote:Hamlet was an emo fag.

This is like, half of my point.

Nick · Post by **Nick** » November 10, 2006, 2:05 am

Google fight concludes:

Rediculous: 1,900,000
Ridiculous: 36,600,000

Ridiculous wins.

Nookular: 38,600
Nuclear: 130,000,000

Nuclear wins.

Regardless: 156,000,000
Irregardless: 716,000

Regardless wins.

Definitive victories for the three major contenders. Irregardless is a poor mans regardless, begone!

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » November 10, 2006, 2:38 am

kyoukan wrote:
Zaelath wrote:Hamlet was an emo fag.
This is like, half of my point.

Yeah, but I don't get to use that phrase much

noel · Post by **noel** » November 10, 2006, 3:04 am

Truant wrote:Holy shit.

Let me start by apologizing profusely for unintentionally subjecting those of you from higher social classes to the casual language of us low born unfortunates who live across the tracks.

On the other hand, I'm sure you and your cronies had a terrific chortle when you related the story of the poor, dumb fool and his horrid butchering of your exquisite language.

Honestly, I didn't even think about it. Upon further review I see that the word I chose is sort of a term that contradicts itself, and for that I sincerely apologize. I hope the trauma was minimal.

Anyways, I'm off the reconnoiter the premises for beer.

Cheerio.

I laughed!

Boogahz · Post by **Boogahz** » November 10, 2006, 10:29 am

noel wrote:
Truant wrote:Holy shit.

Let me start by apologizing profusely for unintentionally subjecting those of you from higher social classes to the casual language of us low born unfortunates who live across the tracks.

On the other hand, I'm sure you and your cronies had a terrific chortle when you related the story of the poor, dumb fool and his horrid butchering of your exquisite language.

Honestly, I didn't even think about it. Upon further review I see that the word I chose is sort of a term that contradicts itself, and for that I sincerely apologize. I hope the trauma was minimal.

Anyways, I'm off the reconnoiter the premises for beer.

Cheerio.
I laughed!

I had a Shiner for him.

vn_Tanc · Post by **vn_Tanc** » November 10, 2006, 11:18 am

Best derail evar!

Vaemas · Post by **Vaemas** » November 10, 2006, 11:43 am

Boogahz wrote:
noel wrote:
Truant wrote:Holy shit.

Let me start by apologizing profusely for unintentionally subjecting those of you from higher social classes to the casual language of us low born unfortunates who live across the tracks.

On the other hand, I'm sure you and your cronies had a terrific chortle when you related the story of the poor, dumb fool and his horrid butchering of your exquisite language.

Honestly, I didn't even think about it. Upon further review I see that the word I chose is sort of a term that contradicts itself, and for that I sincerely apologize. I hope the trauma was minimal.

Anyways, I'm off the reconnoiter the premises for beer.

Cheerio.
I laughed!
I had a Shiner for him.

He knows he's got rights to my bottle of 21 year portwood scotch! Just has to get himself back over to equally backwoods territory to do it!

miir · Post by **miir** » November 10, 2006, 12:01 pm

Kevin is prepared to go the distance in order to do what he feels is necessary to protect and safeguard the children and will not be intimidated or dissuaded from pursuit of those goals

Which children is he talking about.
The 2 from Shar Jackson (who the fuck is she anhyway?) or the 2 from Brittney?

Boogahz · Post by **Boogahz** » November 10, 2006, 1:01 pm

Vaemas wrote:
Boogahz wrote:
noel wrote:
Truant wrote:Holy shit.

Let me start by apologizing profusely for unintentionally subjecting those of you from higher social classes to the casual language of us low born unfortunates who live across the tracks.

On the other hand, I'm sure you and your cronies had a terrific chortle when you related the story of the poor, dumb fool and his horrid butchering of your exquisite language.

Honestly, I didn't even think about it. Upon further review I see that the word I chose is sort of a term that contradicts itself, and for that I sincerely apologize. I hope the trauma was minimal.

Anyways, I'm off the reconnoiter the premises for beer.

Cheerio.
I laughed!
I had a Shiner for him.
He knows he's got rights to my bottle of 21 year portwood scotch! Just has to get himself back over to equally backwoods territory to do it!

That would be nice...if he weren't looking for beer!

Kaldaur · Post by **Kaldaur** » November 10, 2006, 1:22 pm

Probably the children with Britney. I dont' see why his children from a previous marriage would be involved in this custody battle.

miir · Post by **miir** » November 10, 2006, 1:31 pm

Kaldaur wrote:Probably the children with Britney. I dont' see why his children from a previous marriage would be involved in this custody battle.

He wasn't even married to her.
He actually married Brittney when Shar was pregnant with thier second child.

Man, this guy is a real piece of work.

Arborealus · Post by **Arborealus** » November 10, 2006, 1:34 pm

Boogahz wrote:
Vaemas wrote:
Boogahz wrote:
noel wrote:
Truant wrote:Holy shit.

Let me start by apologizing profusely for unintentionally subjecting those of you from higher social classes to the casual language of us low born unfortunates who live across the tracks.

On the other hand, I'm sure you and your cronies had a terrific chortle when you related the story of the poor, dumb fool and his horrid butchering of your exquisite language.

Honestly, I didn't even think about it. Upon further review I see that the word I chose is sort of a term that contradicts itself, and for that I sincerely apologize. I hope the trauma was minimal.

Anyways, I'm off the reconnoiter the premises for beer.

Cheerio.
I laughed!
I had a Shiner for him.
He knows he's got rights to my bottle of 21 year portwood scotch! Just has to get himself back over to equally backwoods territory to do it!
That would be nice...if he weren't looking for beer!

And we've just had a taste of The Glennmorangie 18 a few weeks back...Well, a bit more than a taste actually...

Boogahz · Post by **Boogahz** » November 10, 2006, 1:37 pm

Arborealus wrote:
Boogahz wrote:
Vaemas wrote:
Boogahz wrote:
noel wrote: I laughed!
I had a Shiner for him.
He knows he's got rights to my bottle of 21 year portwood scotch! Just has to get himself back over to equally backwoods territory to do it!
That would be nice...if he weren't looking for beer!
And we've just had a taste of The Glennmorangie 18 a few weeks back...Well, a bit more than a taste actually...

Did you get bok bok drunk and take advantage of him again?

Wulfran · Post by **Wulfran** » November 10, 2006, 2:12 pm

Arborealus wrote:
Boogahz wrote:
Vaemas wrote:
Boogahz wrote:
noel wrote: I laughed!
I had a Shiner for him.
He knows he's got rights to my bottle of 21 year portwood scotch! Just has to get himself back over to equally backwoods territory to do it!
That would be nice...if he weren't looking for beer!
And we've just had a taste of The Glennmorangie 18 a few weeks back...Well, a bit more than a taste actually...

You're supposed to savor that stuff, Arb!

Vaemas · Post by **Vaemas** » November 10, 2006, 2:39 pm

Arborealus wrote:
Boogahz wrote:
Vaemas wrote:
Boogahz wrote:
noel wrote: I laughed!
I had a Shiner for him.
He knows he's got rights to my bottle of 21 year portwood scotch! Just has to get himself back over to equally backwoods territory to do it!
That would be nice...if he weren't looking for beer!
And we've just had a taste of The Glennmorangie 18 a few weeks back...Well, a bit more than a taste actually...

The day I get that high-paying job as an auditor, I'm ordering that super expensive bottle that Anders has always suggested to me. Maybe then I won't have to take out that second mortgage to afford it!