Oxymoron Alert - French Leadership

Metanis · Post by **Metanis** » August 27, 2006, 5:12 pm

Al wrote:True, it was an attack, although I think you took it personally when in fact it was an attack on the generalized statement you made about assertions. My entire point was that not all assertions can be backed up with logic, reason or evidence, regardless of the amount of truth behind them. I could make the assertion, "You must be a bull, because you know what bullshit smells like." I just backed that up with logic and evidence (and some may even say reason), but I'm sure you know the truth behind it is lacking. The fact that you are making it a black and white issue leads me to believe that you are either trolling or are, in fact, retarded. The chips are stacked high against trolling...

I see you have an advanced degree.

PHD.

Bullshit - Piled Higher & Deeper.

Your poorly constructed and poorly presented argument is totally lacking any merit.

Nick · Post by **Nick** » August 27, 2006, 5:33 pm

Care to explain why?

All you've done in the last month is deride any counter point to your argument with how "liberal" or "dumb" the poster is without actually debating anything to any degree or explaining why you feel differently?

If you are going to keep doing that, maybe the Current Events forum isn't for you? At least pretend to debate mate so it isn't quite so obvious that you're trolling for the sake of it.

Metanis · Post by **Metanis** » August 27, 2006, 5:50 pm

Nick wrote:Care to explain why?

All you've done in the last month is deride any counter point to your argument with how "liberal" or "dumb" the poster is without actually debating anything to any degree or explaining why you feel differently?

If you are going to keep doing that, maybe the Current Events forum isn't for you? At least pretend to debate mate so it isn't quite so obvious that you're trolling for the sake of it.

OK Nick, however you need to apply this post of yours to Al.

Nick · Post by **Nick** » August 27, 2006, 6:04 pm

It's like talking to a brick wall.

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » August 27, 2006, 6:10 pm

Nick wrote:It's like talking to a brick wall.

Your not that bad!

Nick · Post by **Nick** » August 27, 2006, 6:34 pm

Metanis · Post by **Metanis** » August 27, 2006, 7:07 pm

Nick wrote:Care to explain why?

All you've done in the last month is deride any counter point to your argument with how "liberal" or "dumb" the poster is without actually debating anything to any degree or explaining why you feel differently?

If you are going to keep doing that, maybe the Current Events forum isn't for you? At least pretend to debate mate so it isn't quite so obvious that you're trolling for the sake of it.

Nick, here's the truth...

If you and I are discussing the merits of Ford versus Chevrolet and someone throws in a comment about those fucking Irish wannabees, THEN, you and I are under no obligation to take notice of the asshole trying to derail the thread.

As I've stated before within this thread my comments about an adult proving their assertions were directed at Kooky's attempt to smear me.

In other words, the assertions were either empty lies or she needed to make an effort to prove them.

Now Al comes in and tries to stab me in the back by equating the assertions of faith with the more mundane but provable assertions of wrongdoing. He's talking apples while I'm talking oranges.

I find it unnecessary to take him or his derail bullshit seriously.

Meanwhile I'm still waiting for Kooky to post a single sentence in proof of her own bullshit assertions.

And because I feel the duty to explain what should be totally fucking obvious to even the most casual observer here, the definition of faith is "belief that does not require proof".

As in, I have faith that you will eventually grow up and become a good citizen.

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » August 27, 2006, 9:40 pm

Nick wrote:

Is someone getting their panties in a wad and gonna stop posting again?

Nick · Post by **Nick** » August 27, 2006, 11:08 pm

My "panties" are fine Cartalas, I wouldn't get annoyed by your little flirt my good man

Al · Post by Al » August 28, 2006, 9:43 am

Metanis wrote:Now Al comes in and tries to stab me in the back

I already explained the non-personal nature of my initial statement. If you continue to see it as a personal attack, then please, continue to make an ass of yourself in front of everyone. I believe my exact words were, "in fact it was an attack on the generalized statement you made about assertions. My entire point was that not all assertions can be backed up with logic, reason or evidence, regardless of the amount of truth behind them."

This conversation is over.

Post by **Sylvus** » August 28, 2006, 12:11 pm

Metanis wrote:And because I feel the duty to explain what should be totally fucking obvious to even the most casual observer here, the definition of faith is "belief that does not require proof".

So you state that adults have to prove their assertions. You also state that your "belief that does not require proof" exempts you, an adult, from proving those assertions that you have faith in.

I'll let her speak for herself on this one, and prove my assertion that she has faith in her statement that you plagiarized your "opinion" that opened this thread. That would then exempt her from having to prove anything, as you have said yourself it does.

But perhaps you missed where she went a little deeper on it, in effect backing up her assertion (which is a matter of "faith", so she did it unnecessarily)

kyoukan wrote: Yes because it was a blatant plagarization of someone else's thoughts, from one of those stupid fucking blogs you read like they are news. It doesn't take a whole lot of reading skills to figure out what you copied and pasted into here far exceeded anything you've ever posted in here in terms of clarity of thought and in regards to the level of communications skills. The whole point was still dead wrong from a philosophic point of view, but it was still far beyond anything you could ever vomit onto an internet forum.

When you spend three years doing nothing but posting "loonie liberals" over and over again and suddenly come up with a cogent series of sentences that contain actual linear thinking and compelling (if wrong) arguments, you can't honestly expect anyone to fucking believe you. You're such an enormous retard that posting anything other than "lol lieberalz r gay" is going to make everyone wonder from what source you are getting your non-retard posts from.

Now while she didn't dive into the septic tank that is your ideology's blogosphere to find the specific author that presented the idea that you're passing off as your own, I tend to give her comments a hearty "Q.E.D." on this one.

*~*stragi*~* · Post by ***~*stragi*~*** » August 28, 2006, 1:55 pm

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:
kyoukan wrote:
When you spend three years doing nothing but posting "loonie liberals" over and over again and suddenly come up with a cogent series of sentences that contain actual linear thinking and compelling (if wrong) arguments, you can't honestly expect anyone to fucking believe you. .
****in an Irish accent***

"Ahhh well good morning", said the Pot.

"A wonderful morning to you", said the Kettle.

"Lookin a wee bit Black today", said the Pot.

I didn't think you could be even more racist but you proved me wrong!

*~*stragi*~* · Post by ***~*stragi*~*** » August 28, 2006, 1:56 pm

metanis are you john mark karr irl

Kylere · Post by **Kylere** » August 28, 2006, 10:42 pm

Stragi you fucking moron, the pot and the kettle thing come from them being cast bloody iron, some even refer to it as being from the shiny kettle being seen by the pot. Hell it is from the 1800's in origin, predating the modern use of the term black as a racial descriptor.