Interesting casting for this, the next Bond movie. Daniel Craig is going to be the first blond 007 ever, and we've got a Danish actor as Le Chiffre, the bad guy; Mads Mikkelsen. I'm not getting my hopes up too high as Bond movies in general have lost a lot of the style they used to have, but...it could be good. Casino Royale was the first 007 book Ian Fleming wrote, but the Broccolis (the owners of the 007 movie franchise) couldn't get the rights to the book back in the day - instead it was shot with a different, rather odd, cast as a semi-parody: Peter Sellers, David Niven, Orson Welles.
The new version of the movie should be more true to the original book, and I'm hoping Craig can bring the style back to Bond.
007:
Le Chiffre:
IT'S HARD TO PUT YOUR FINGER ON IT; SOMETHING IS WRONG
I'M LIKE THE UNCLE WHO HUGGED YOU A LITTLE TOO LONG
The fucked up part is that Pierce Brosnan seemed like the protypical 007. They did OK jobs on the first 2 films, but since then they seem to forgot that these are supposed to be spy thrillers. Where are the crazy villains? Dr. Evil is a more convincing bad guy.
"There is at least as much need to curb the cruel greed and arrogance of part of the world of capital, to curb the cruel greed and violence of part of the world of labor, as to check a cruel and unhealthy militarism in international relationships." -Theodore Roosevelt
Well its kind of a vital part of him being in the role he is in, and there is no way you are going to get me to believe he didn't know that coming into the role.
It's not like driving a manual is really all that hard anyhow, I think it took me about 2 days of light driving to get to the point where I wasn't stalling the car or jerking when I shifted gears.
Funkmasterr wrote:Well its kind of a vital part of him being in the role he is in, and there is no way you are going to get me to believe he didn't know that coming into the role.
It's not like driving a manual is really all that hard anyhow, I think it took me about 2 days of light driving to get to the point where I wasn't stalling the car or jerking when I shifted gears.
So if it's not really that hard... Don't you think that he'll be able to learn? He's an actor. It shouldn't matter what his driving abilities happen to be. That's what they have stunt drivers for anyway. I don't see really how his driving abilities would be relevant to the casting process.
I think I remember something about Pierce not being able to drive stick before he was Bond. Regardless though, I don't think this guy looks the part for Bond either.
I have no knowledge of the DB5 but aren't newer luxo-sport cars coming w/ paddle shifters?
Regardless, newer shift cars take so little time to learn compared to the older, shitty car shifters. It's almost a joke how easy modern day cars are to shift. I'm sure as a professional actor, he'll be more than suitable in a couple of days doing intense training.
I just saw this last night and was incredibly impressed. It's quite possibly my favorite 007 movie in a long time. Craig's Bond is raw, magnetic, flawed and extremely human (and by far the hottest to date). His delivery of the very few cliche lines was done comedically and was the first Bond *ever* to make me laugh out loud.
I couldn't say enough about Mads Mikkelsen's Le Chiffre. He was brilliantly desperate and creepy. The character was quite complex and I found that the scariest thing about him was his desperation. I don't think that'd be too easy to pull of but Mads conveyed that amazingly. Also, Craig and Mikkelsen played beautifully off each other in a few scenes. I love when I see two actors have that kind of rapport.
The story seemed a lot more plot-driven and realistic and less reliant on gadgetry than any other - in fact, there are virtually none. And the movie was extremely fast-paced without having an excess of action sequences. I didn't really notice how long the movie was until the last 10 minutes.
If you've become accustomed to the older Bond format and go in with those kinds of expectations, you might be disappointed (though my money is on "pleasantly surprised"). Their intention was to re-format the 007 franchise and they succeeded - and did it with style.
PS
Eva Green was a fucking bombshell in this movie. She's a better Bond girl than the likes of Halle Berry and Denise Richards could ever hope to be.
PSS
Drolgin - Another Dane is in it too: Jesper Christensen.
Side note: if I ever rave about an action movie, you can bet your ass it's a fantastic one since I don't tend to be a big fan.
Last edited by laneela on November 19, 2006, 8:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Laneela
You may take our lives, but you will never take our trousers!
I just saw it last night at the Cinerama in Seattle (huuuuge screen). It's probably my favorite Bond movie ever. I've never been a huge fan of Bond in the past. Primarily because there's just too damn many, and they became so focused on the gadgets and gizmos that it got pretty rediculous. Though I do remember LOVING the gadgets when I was a kid.
I'm glad they've reinvented the series with this one in a similar fashion to Batman Begins, making it a bit more dark and 'real'. I thought Daniel Craig was fucking awesome and Eva Green is the most beautifu and intelligent Bond girl so far.
What a great flick. Daniel Craig has a fantastic screen presence. Easily my favorite Bond movie since I was a kid. It's funny, because when I saw him in Layer Cake, I mentioned out loud to my wife at one point "I think he'd make a really good James Bond".
Daniel Craig did to Bond, what Christian Bale did to Batman.
To the above homo/emo men capping on this guy's looks. Well, lol. He's a good looking guy with a damn fine physique. (Kwon can back me up on that!) I don't understand where any of your hating came from. I doubt you'll even admit it even when he starts showing up on "sexiest men alive" polls next year.
I don't have a man-crush on him or anything, I'm just saying...
I saw it this weekend and thought it was brilliant. I'm having a hard time deciding where to place it on my "best bond movies" chart. For my tastes, I think you need to go all the way back to Connery to find its equal or better, and I grew up on (and loved) Moore's Bond. Craig makes an phenomenal 007, and the lack of reliance upon gadgetry and villains who parody themselves was tremendous. My only (minuscule) complaint is that I could have done with about 5 minutes less poker action and a bit more Felix. I don't think trimming a bit of the poker would have taken anything away from the plot.
"When I was a kid, my father told me, 'Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it.'" - Russel Ziskey
I haven't seen the movie, but the trailer is the first Bond trailer I've seen that actually made me want to see the film. It felt far more stylized than any Bond movies or trailers I've seen. I know a trailer isn't much to go by, but it WILL be the first Bond film I Netflix
Lalanae Burundi High Chancellor for Tourism, Sodomy and Pie
Unofficial Canadian, Forbidden Lover of Pie, Jesus-Hatin'' Sodomite, President of KFC (Kyoukan Fan Club), hawt, perververted, intellectual submissive with E.S.P (Extra Sexual Persuasion)
I thought this was probably the best bond ever. Although I liked Goldeneye a lot. Casino Royale seems to be taking the Bond paradigm in the diraction I thought they were taking it in Goldeneye, where everyone around Bond (including himsefl, I thought) looked at him as sort of an anachronism and un-needed since the end of the cold war, with no more cartoonish super villains to try to stop from building death rays in order to take over the world.
Then in the next three movies he fought cartoonish super villains and stopped them from building death rays to take over the world.
So maybe they won't go that route again this time with Daniel Craig. Although I doubt that they won't. In the next one he will probably be fighting islamic fundamentalist super villains or something equally lame. The people in charge of producing these films always fuck it up.
True, they do end up fucking it all up...and I as well liked Goldeneye--at least conceptually. I think they may squeeze a couple good films out of Craig before they go all batshit and ruin a good story. As far as Islamic Fundamentalists, I am sure the upcoming Rambo movie will cover that.
Hmmm, now that I think about it--how about Remington Steele as the next Bond antagonist? At least he would put up a mean Baccarat battle before placing an easily captured--yet not easliy killed 007 in a sofisticated laser-death machine.
Finally saw this last night. Best Bond movie I've seen imo with the Roger Moore Bond movies being next on the list.
Not sure I need spoilers at this point but:
[hide]Who the hell thought, "why don't we tie Bond up naked in a chair with an open bottom and then whack him in the nuts five or six times with a large knotted rope as torture?"
...you just don't mess with 007's family jewels like that! Of all the methods of torture they could come up with, they settled on crushing his balls? Wow.[/hide]
The action in Casino Royale was entertaining but Bond took twice the beating in this movie that any other Bond took over the course of two movies. He was more superhuman than agent at some points. The stunt work was excellent though.
They did a good job of touching on the traditional lines and characteristics of 007 without going overboard.
[hide]As it turns out, his love interest wasn't a traitor but if she was, a great scene would have been Bond reviving her from drowning, and then killing her again after getting off a good one liner.[/hide]
Hmm, for some reason I thought I'd already commented on this. Anyways, I have to agree, was probably one of the best Bond movies made. Daniel Craig blew me away as 007, far surpassing my initial reaction to his casting news. And Eva Green.. well... she's just fucking fantastic. The French and Swedish should mate more often.