Surface-conduction Electron-emitter Displays

[Winnow]

You heard it here first! The end of 2006, and starting in 2007, we'll all be wanting SED displays.

January 5, 2006 - We use plasma sets and we use LCDs. We like them. They're stylish. And their respective picture qualities have gotten better and better over the years. Not quite up to the black levels or the response times of standard CRT setups, sure, but nevertheless pretty damned good. The new plasmas from Pioneer and Panasonic are particularly impressive. And yet, a new technology from Toshiba promises to do the unthinkable and combine the best of CRT with the best of flat-panel displays. If we hadn't seen this impressive new tech for ourselves at CES 2006, we'd be quick to shrug it off, but having beheld it, we're here to confidently state that plasma and LCD better watch out.


Toshiba is planning to release this new line of unbelievably accurate flat-panel sets in late 2006. The technology is called "Surface-conduction Electron-emitter Display" (yes, that's a mouthful) or SED for short. The electronics maker showcased prototype SED sets at CES and every IGN editor on-hand was in agreement: nothing else compares.
So how does it all work? SED sets use 6,220,800 electron emitters - or one for each color per pixel, to be precise - which cause red, blue and green phosphors to glow. That may not mean much to most, but the results will definitely matter. Toshiba's CES 2006 SED sets featured the deepest black levels we have ever seen on any television, including CRT - and these televisions are as flat as any plasma! Consider this: the typical plasma set sports a contrast ratio of 3000:1, but Toshiba's prototype SEDs offer a whopping 10,000:1 contrast ratio for truly unparalleled color and accuracy.


Toshiba took us into a dark demo room with three 42" SEDs inside. The sets displayed a variety of video, from a boat moving along the ocean at night to a woman examining a pretty artifact. We were continually amazed by how rich and deep the blacks were in these pictures, and always without sacrificing image detail. The graying effect commonly associated with low contrast ratios was not only missing from these videos, but the 16x9 "letterbox bars" were so deeply black that the pictures looked to be coming out of the nearby wall and not displayed on a television at all.

It gets better. The prototype SEDs on-hand at CES 2006 are far from finished, according to company spokespersons. The sets we viewed were running in 720p and not the standard 1080p that SEDs will accommodate later this year. Meanwhile, the 42" SEDs we saw will be axed in favor of a base size that begins at 55", Toshiba promises. The SEDs will also deliver a 1 millisecond response time, which guarantees that blurring or refresh issues will be a thing of the past. And get this - craziest of all, the final SEDs will ship with a contrast ratio of 100,000:1 to one. Yes, we wrote that correctly -- one-hundred thousand to one.


Toshiba reps are confident of SED, calling these sets the "new standard." And having seen them in motion, we agree. These babies are beautiful and nothing else that we've seen even comes close.

Unfortunately, the electronics maker was hush-hush on pricing for SEDs and would not even venture to give us a ballpark figure for these televisions. That noted, previous reports on the technology state that it can be mass-produced on a cheaper scale than competing plasma or LCD televisions.

100,000:1 contrast ratio! Cheaper to make than LCDs. 1ms response time. 1080p. 55" smallest size. Nice

[Sionistic]

christ, 100k:1 is sick

[Midgen]

More info here...

teamxbox.com SED article

From the same site, a pretty good Guide to HDTV

[masteen]

So are these going to cost like a million dollars or what?

p.s. SED is an acronym we use at work a lot. SED = Severe Emotional Disability or "crackbaby syndrome" as I've come to call it. Some bad ass, soon-to-be-tried-as-an-adult little motherfuckers. I swear to God people should need a permit to breed.

[Deward]

THey say it will come out but if they are the only makers then you can expect them to cost way too much. Maybe in five years they will get to the price level that the majority of us will pay for it.

[Winnow]

There's no price but

That noted, previous reports on the technology state that it can be mass-produced on a cheaper scale than competing plasma or LCD televisions.

sounds promising to me.

[Animalor]

There's no price but

That noted, previous reports on the technology state that it can be mass-produced on a cheaper scale than competing plasma or LCD televisions.

sounds promising to me.

Sounds to me like Toshiba will be free to gouge the public pretty liberally =)

[Zaelath]

There's no price but

That noted, previous reports on the technology state that it can be mass-produced on a cheaper scale than competing plasma or LCD televisions.

sounds promising to me.

Sounds to me like Toshiba will be free to gouge the public pretty liberally =)

Possibly, OTOH most people here won't replace a "working" TV at all, let alone with a multi-thousand dollar set.

Early adopters with more money than sense will still pay for R&D as usual, thanks!

[Animalor]

I'm only planning on getting an HD set when my Sony 28" dies or if I ever get a monetary windfall of biblical proportions =P