Canada's valiant attempt at "dumb legal system" ti

What do you think about the world?
Post Reply
User avatar
Zaelath
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4621
Joined: April 11, 2003, 5:53 am
Location: Canberra

Canada's valiant attempt at "dumb legal system" ti

Post by Zaelath »

tle (it accepted the whole string when I wrote it..)


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ ... /National/
Regina — A Saskatchewan man must continue paying child support for his stepdaughter even though his ex-wife married the child's biological father, a court has ruled.
May 2003 - "Mission Accomplished"
June 2005 - "The mission isn't easy, and it will not be accomplished overnight"
-- G W Bush, freelance writer for The Daily Show.
Lynks
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2774
Joined: September 30, 2002, 6:58 pm
XBL Gamertag: launchpad1979
Location: Sudbury, Ontario

Post by Lynks »

Thats not right at all.
User avatar
Boogahz
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 9438
Joined: July 6, 2002, 2:00 pm
Gender: Male
XBL Gamertag: corin12
PSN ID: boog144
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Post by Boogahz »

If there was a smiley that showed it scratching it's head, that would be here...
Sabek
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1702
Joined: July 8, 2002, 4:31 pm
Gender: Male
XBL Gamertag: sabek
Location: Columbus, Oh

Post by Sabek »

You should never have to pay child support for a step-child unless you adopted them.
If he adopted the step-child it doesnt matter who the childs real father is, he is responsible.
The man petitioned for divorce in November 1998 and claimed access to the children.
There's the issue he basically claimed the kid as his own.
Sabek
Just Sabek
Image
User avatar
Nick
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 5711
Joined: July 4, 2002, 3:45 pm

Post by Nick »

That is just fucking evil.

What type of cretinous wanker judge made that decision, and why hasn't he been shot in the fucking mouth?

That guy should just refuse to pay it.
User avatar
kyoukan
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 8548
Joined: July 5, 2002, 3:33 am
Location: Vancouver

Post by kyoukan »

Most states have identical laws. If you marry a woman with a child, you assume legal responsibility of it. Even if the woman re-marries (the fact that it's the biological father is ironic but legally irrelevant), you are still responsible for keeping the child in the lifestyle it was accustomed to when living with you. The biological father probably has a much lower income.

Even weirder is that this law applies to common law as well.

You have to be really wary about getting into a relationship with a single mom/dad because it can have long term consequences. You can even be on the hook to pay for the kid's university education even if you lived with the parent and the child for six months.

I wish I could remember the name of the book, but I was listening to a talk show on the radio a couple weeks ago with the author of a book that touches on all the financial and legal impacts of getting a divorce. It was pretty scary.
Post Reply