Low Morale among Insurgency?

Voronwë · Post by **Voronwë** » May 3, 2005, 3:01 pm

[b][color=red]CNN.com[/color][/b] wrote:
U.S.: Possible letter to al-Zarqawi cites low morale
New Iraqi government sworn in, but Cabinet vacancies remain
Tuesday, May 3, 2005 Posted: 12:41 PM EDT (1641 GMT)

BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- The U.S. military said Tuesday it has seized a letter from Iraqi insurgents believed to be intended for Jordanian-born militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi complaining about low morale among followers and weakening support for the insurgency. The authenticity of the letter -- which the military said American troops found Thursday in a raid in Baghdad -- could not be independently verified.

Would definitely be good news, especially in the face of what seems to be increased insurgent activity lately.

Sueven · Post by **Sueven** » May 3, 2005, 3:33 pm

Great news if it's authentic.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » May 3, 2005, 4:20 pm

They're running low on recruits that want to blow themselves up.

Aslanna · Post by **Aslanna** » May 3, 2005, 4:25 pm

Winnow wrote:They're running low on recruits that want to blow themselves up.

Unfortunately I don't think that is the problem.

Niffoni · Post by **Niffoni** » May 3, 2005, 6:12 pm

Is it just me, or did it take a lot to depress these guys? People in north america jump out the window when their stocks take a dive.

Maybe we could recruit terrorists to teach us coping skills. It seems a waste to just keep letting them blow themselves up.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » May 3, 2005, 6:27 pm

Random off topic posting:

pwned! Rejected right back at ya!

U.S. Rejects Canadian Rejection of DMCA

Slashdot readers may recall that last month Canadian policy makers rejected the DMCA for Canada. Not so fast apparently -- the U.S. Trade Representative has released the annual Section 301 report which each year tells the rest of the world that they need stronger intellectual property protection. This year Canada is a particular target -- the U.S. plans to conduct a special review of Canadian policies and explicitly rejects Canada's rejection of the DMCA. A good summary on what this means from Canadian law professor Michael Geist.

Aslanna · Post by **Aslanna** » May 3, 2005, 6:32 pm

Rejected rejection! Going to need a flowchart soon...

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » May 3, 2005, 8:26 pm

This tracebuster will bust his motherfuckin' tracebuster-buster!

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » May 3, 2005, 8:32 pm

is the bush admin still sticking with their whole imaginary al'qeda operative running the insurgency story?

Forthe · Post by **Forthe** » May 4, 2005, 12:11 am

Winnow wrote:Random off topic posting:

pwned! Rejected right back at ya!

U.S. Rejects Canadian Rejection of DMCA

Slashdot readers may recall that last month Canadian policy makers rejected the DMCA for Canada. Not so fast apparently -- the U.S. Trade Representative has released the annual Section 301 report which each year tells the rest of the world that they need stronger intellectual property protection. This year Canada is a particular target -- the U.S. plans to conduct a special review of Canadian policies and explicitly rejects Canada's rejection of the DMCA. A good summary on what this means from Canadian law professor Michael Geist.

This leaves us little choice but to reject your rejection of our rejection.

DMCA is utter crap...I'm surprised our government didn't support it.

nobody · Post by **nobody** » May 4, 2005, 1:56 am

Niffoni wrote:Is it just me, or did it take a lot to depress these guys? People in north america jump out the window when their stocks take a dive.

Maybe we could recruit terrorists to teach us coping skills. It seems a waste to just keep letting them blow themselves up.

too true.

Kyoukan wrote:is the bush admin still sticking with their whole imaginary al'qeda operative running the insurgency story?

are you still sticking with your whole imaginary iraqis don't want democracy story?

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » May 4, 2005, 2:13 am

no I'm sure the imaginary ones do.

Nick · Post by **Nick** » May 4, 2005, 2:17 am

Forthe · Post by **Forthe** » May 4, 2005, 4:28 am

kyoukan wrote:no I'm sure the imaginary ones do.

And the dead ones.

nobody · Post by **nobody** » May 4, 2005, 12:59 pm

kyoukan wrote:no I'm sure the imaginary ones do.

doh!

Sylvos · Post by **Sylvos** » May 4, 2005, 1:08 pm

that was quite a witty response kyoukan.
i laughed.
two times.
once cause it was funny
twice because it was funnier the second time i read it.
Wasn't that funny the third time, i only smiled.

Voronwë · Post by **Voronwë** » May 4, 2005, 1:22 pm

keep us posted on your progress sylvos

thx

Sylvos · Post by **Sylvos** » May 4, 2005, 1:57 pm

during my lunch break (at 9am cause working for adobe sucks balls) i took an hour nap because i have a migraine.
Then i woke up , took a pee at the urinal and farted.

More to come.

Post by **Sylvus** » May 4, 2005, 2:34 pm

I'm pretty sure he was just kidding.

God, I think I have to hear about every time you go to the bathroom every day.

Sylvos · Post by **Sylvos** » May 4, 2005, 2:50 pm

not everytime!

but my bowel movements are VERY important.

Burke · Post by **Burke** » May 4, 2005, 3:49 pm

Stool rules,
Urine pools.