WoW on NPR(National Public Radio).

WoW Discussion
Post Reply
User avatar
Keverian FireCry
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2919
Joined: July 3, 2002, 6:41 pm
Gender: Mangina
Location: Seattle, WA

WoW on NPR(National Public Radio).

Post by Keverian FireCry »

So I listen to NPR fairly regularly and I was suprised to hear an article on World of Warcraft one afternoon on "All Things Considered". The written article talks about the evolution from D&D RPGs to the MMORPG, etc as well as comparing WoW to EQ2. You can listen to the review on their site which I enjoyed, especially the familiar sound effects in the background :) The written article is not the same as the audio file, but share some similarities.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... Id=4537744

World of Warcraft, a new multi-player online game, has participants including reviewer Robert Holt captivated. He says the highly stylized fantasy world may be the best role-playing game yet.

The game's biggest flaw is that it's too popular -- and there are times when the servers are overloaded and the game is unresponsive.

For Npr.org, Holt discusses the evolution of role-playing games, from Dungeons and Dragons to WoW.

'Warcraft' Latest in a Line of Role-Playing Games

Role-playing games have their roots in fantasy novels like J. R. R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings. Dungeons and Dragons, a pen, paper and dice role-playing game invented over 30 years ago is the predecessor of video RPGs.

In role-playing games, you create a character -- one that's not necessarily like you, but one that suits your style. This character can be one of many different races, and it can be many different things -- a wizard or mage, a thief or rogue, or just a plain fighter. The goal of the game is to go on adventures with groups of friends, finding treasure and gaining experience that makes your character more powerful as he attains new levels. All the while acting like this character -- and not necessarily you -- would act.

A large part of role-playing games involves calculations, and that takes the person out of the role. When you say, "I attack the gnoll" -- you then need to roll a die, and then make calculations as to whether you actually hit the beast, and how hard.

Computers were a natural fit to replace the tedious aspects of RPGs. The dice rolling and calculations still happen, but behind the scenes so that you're never taken out of the action. The first result of this marriage of computers, multiple-players and RPGs were text-only online games called MUDs. or Multi-User-Dungeons. These MUDs dominated college mainframes in the late 80's and early nineties. Then came EverQuest -- which still had all of the dice rolling, but added a 3-D graphical interface that depicted the results of the calculations. You still could see text in the window that says, "You hit the gnoll for 35 damage," but you can also see your sword slamming into its face, and hear him cry out in pain. EverQuest was highly successful in its time, and I tried to like it, but it was incredibly clunky, and boring. You spent the first 10 hours killing rats and snakes and other low-level creatures to gain experience.

This is not the case with World of Warcraft (WoW). As with almost every Blizzard title, the game is highly polished, has an intuitive interface, and is simply beautiful to look at and listen to. A team of over 30 artists worked on the game's visuals, and it shows. The art is highly stylized -- the world doesn't look entirely realistic, and that's on purpose, as I found out through the behind the scenes DVD that came with the collector's edition of the game. EverQuest II, the sequel to the pioneering EverQuest, tries to look realistic, and for that reason you notice the flaws a lot more when it fails. The stylized visuals of WoW somehow make it easier to suspend your disbelief, and immerse you in the world.

And immerse you it does. Let me warn you -- this game is highly addictive. In the two months I've been at it, I've logged over five days of playing time. And I've stopped watching TV altogether.

Of all the online role-playing games out there, this is the best. All of the others, especially EverQuest II, pale in comparison. EverQuest II's interface is clunky, and there's a lot of grinding -- the act of killing the same type of monster over and over again to gain experience. In contrast, WoW's quest system starts you off right away with purposeful missions. There are multiple story lines that advance as you complete quests.

There's also the overarching battle between factions of players. When you create a character, the race you choose decides which side you're on -- Alliance or Horde. Players of both factions exist in the same worlds and can battle each other.

The interface just feels right. It lets you get down to the business of role playing, and doesn't get in the way.

In WoW, interaction with other players is essential. There are certain quests that cannot be finished solo. The human element adds a lot of spice to the game. These are the shining moments of the game, when you're deep inside a dungeon with four other real people, and the unexpected or the heroic occurs.

It's easy to take on your role in the game, because other players can't see or hear you, they only see what you make your character do.

Massively multi-player online role-playing games (MMORPGs) have their own vocabulary and etiquette. There are very specific, unwritten rules around almost every aspect of player interaction. It's tough to know what they are, but other players will let you know if you've violated them.
User avatar
Bubba Grizz
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 6121
Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:52 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Green Bay, Wisconsin

Post by Bubba Grizz »

No love for the UO? that came out before EQ and after Muds. Not that I ever played it but it should get some credit.
User avatar
Boogahz
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 9438
Joined: July 6, 2002, 2:00 pm
Gender: Male
XBL Gamertag: corin12
PSN ID: boog144
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Post by Boogahz »

UO should get a LOT of credit.
User avatar
Deward
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1653
Joined: August 2, 2002, 11:59 am
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by Deward »

UO sucked ass in my opinion. I played for five hours and could only find one measly bunny to kill and then got ganked by some wizard.
Deward
Voronwë
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 7176
Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:57 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Voronwë »

did that cocksucker say killing bats and fire beetles was boring?!?!?!?!?!?!
User avatar
Lohrno
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2416
Joined: July 6, 2002, 4:58 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by Lohrno »

Deward wrote:UO sucked ass in my opinion. I played for five hours and could only find one measly bunny to kill and then got ganked by some wizard.
Yes but it was the first...

There were some graphical muds but they didn't catch on as well.
User avatar
Fash
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4147
Joined: July 10, 2002, 2:26 am
Gender: Male
XBL Gamertag: sylblaydis
Location: A Secure Location

Post by Fash »

Deward wrote:UO sucked ass in my opinion. I played for five hours and could only find one measly bunny to kill and then got ganked by some wizard.
you ran around in a circle in britain forest and then happened upon britain mine, a frequent pk spot.

you then took your 0.0001 percent experience of the game, and characterized the whole game by it.

awesome.

i played that game for a good 2 years before they ruined it... that game kicked so much ass, there was no ass left to kick. it is the only MMO that ever caused adrenaline rushes.. a lot of fight or flight scares... and paranoia about everyone else.
Fash

--
Naivety is dangerous.
User avatar
Xouqoa
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4105
Joined: July 2, 2002, 5:49 pm
Gender: Mangina
XBL Gamertag: Xouqoa
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by Xouqoa »

Lohrno wrote:
Deward wrote:UO sucked ass in my opinion. I played for five hours and could only find one measly bunny to kill and then got ganked by some wizard.
Yes but it was the first...

There were some graphical muds but they didn't catch on as well.
I remember when Lohrno and I were going into the Lumberjacking business in UO. Those were the days.
"Our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings." - John F Kennedy
User avatar
Skogen
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1972
Joined: November 18, 2002, 6:48 pm
Location: Claremont, Ca.
Contact:

Post by Skogen »

UO was awesome...I had some great times with that game. It deserves mucho props.
Post Reply