Anne Coultier Meltdown??

Animalor · Post by **Animalor** » March 2, 2005, 4:34 pm

Haven't watched it yet.

http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2665904

miir · Post by **miir** » March 2, 2005, 5:13 pm

She was either drunk or on methamphetamines.... or both.

Niffoni · Post by **Niffoni** » March 2, 2005, 6:14 pm

That just might be the most redundant thread title in VV history.

Kluden · Post by **Kluden** » March 2, 2005, 6:22 pm

Oh god, I love the nervous laugh people use when they need a crutch because they can't think of something to say hehe.....he....hehe...

Hesten · Post by **Hesten** » March 2, 2005, 7:26 pm

Damn, every time i see that woman on clips, i dont know if i should laugh or cry. I sincerely believe that she belong in a mental institution (and no, not because shes on Bush side, if she were defending stuff that i believe in, in that way, it would be even worse. At least i can laugh over her now:))

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » March 2, 2005, 9:03 pm

And Lo, God came before the masses and spake thusly, "Zealot or Sane; choose one".

Midnyte_Ragebringer · Post by **Midnyte_Ragebringer** » March 2, 2005, 9:14 pm

Combs and his double talk could drive anyone to her frustrations.

The Kansas Attorney General compares to the ex-vice-president and major members of congress? It's laughable. I completely understand her frustration.

Lynks · Post by **Lynks** » March 2, 2005, 9:17 pm

Of course you would, you and her are masters of avoiding the subject with your cockamamy* drivel.

* Fisrt time I ever used that word in a sentence.

Aruman · Post by **Aruman** » March 2, 2005, 9:29 pm

Al Gore makes her look like a beginner...

Lynks · Post by **Lynks** » March 2, 2005, 9:33 pm

Thats because he was a robot and we havn't created a good AI program yet

Rivera Bladestrike · Post by **Rivera Bladestrike** » March 2, 2005, 10:11 pm

I bet she stars in Blacks on Blondes.

But damn, talk about some ignorance, and what's she doing out of the kitchen anyway, isn't that one of the conservative views out there?

Metanis · Post by **Metanis** » March 2, 2005, 11:26 pm

Where's the logical analysis you VV pussy-liberal heavyweights are known for?

Alan essentially admitted Democrats use dirty tricks and inflamed rhetoric... then tries to justify it by claiming some minor Republican functionary in the midwest does the same thing.

Think about it... what have you admitted about yourself when you have to pick on an obscure official to try and provide cover for Democrats such as Byrd, Kennedy, Clinton, Kerry, etc. ad nauseum, who all continue to use hate speech and still get a pass from the party that's supposed to care about people.

Ann did a fine job of throwing the bullshit right back at the bullshitter.

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » March 2, 2005, 11:45 pm

She's about as useful to the republican party as roofies (sp?) at an orgy.

Anyone that's not already as partisan as she is thinks she's a nutbag, and while the real masters of the game are using carefully crafted language to sell the centre the complete opposite of what they're buying, she runs her mouth and undoes all that work. The only saving grace is the centre and left can't stand to listen to her insane rambling, hence they don't get the benefit of her exposition.

Niffoni · Post by **Niffoni** » March 3, 2005, 12:08 am

I think the point is that the debate didn't even take place. Colmes gave Ann what Chris Rock would call "The easiest GED questions in the world" which could have handily been thrown back in his face. That's his job... keep the conservatives from embarassing themselves too much.

The only way it could fail would be if the guest turned out to be a retarded, coked-up jack russel terrier with tourettes.

Enter Ann Coultier.

Instead of eating the mousy little bitch's weak "argument" (if you even want to call it that) alive, Ann decided it would best serve her cause to run back and forth, screaming "AAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!11!1!!" while Hannity tried to nonchalantly slide under his desk (but couldn't get Metanis to make room for him down there

).

Coultier isn't even in the game any more. She's so fucked up even the liberals don't seem to hate her... they're trying to help the conservatives put the poor girl down as humanely as possible.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » March 3, 2005, 12:32 am

Those aren't pillows!

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » March 3, 2005, 1:21 am

lmao thats great, and i have to agree with hesten for the same reasons, she is borderline insane, almost a zell miller calibur of insane

Midnyte_Ragebringer · Post by **Midnyte_Ragebringer** » March 3, 2005, 1:26 am

Xzion wrote:lmao thats great, and i have to agree with hesten for the same reasons, she is borderline insane, almost a zell miller calibur of insane

She doesn't share your view....of course you and the rest of the like-minded ones think she is crazy. That's what you have done for the last 5 years....villify those who think differently than you. So pathetically predictable and consistant.

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » March 3, 2005, 2:34 am

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:
Xzion wrote:lmao thats great, and i have to agree with hesten for the same reasons, she is borderline insane, almost a zell miller calibur of insane
She doesn't share your view....of course you and the rest of the like-minded ones think she is crazy. That's what you have done for the last 5 years....villify those who think differently than you. So pathetically predictable and consistant.

Really? I thought that was a republican schtick, just before the bombing begins. At least liberals just think conservatives are ignorant, Coulter on the other hand (and I had to laugh) says liberals support murder and are just inherently evil.

Hesten · Post by **Hesten** » March 3, 2005, 4:03 am

Aruman wrote:Al Gore makes her look like a beginner...

You forget that Al Gore created the Intarweb, he rocks

Hesten · Post by **Hesten** » March 3, 2005, 4:07 am

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:
Xzion wrote:lmao thats great, and i have to agree with hesten for the same reasons, she is borderline insane, almost a zell miller calibur of insane
She doesn't share your view....of course you and the rest of the like-minded ones think she is crazy. That's what you have done for the last 5 years....villify those who think differently than you. So pathetically predictable and consistant.

And snice Midnyte didnd read the last part of my post, here it is again:

and no, not because shes on Bush side, if she were defending stuff that i believe in, in that way, it would be even worse. At least i can laugh over her now:))

Believe me, i think most of us would think it 10X worse if she were AGAINS Bush. Its always easier if the other side got the most nutbags

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » March 3, 2005, 8:31 am

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:
Xzion wrote:lmao thats great, and i have to agree with hesten for the same reasons, she is borderline insane, almost a zell miller calibur of insane
She doesn't share your view....of course you and the rest of the like-minded ones think she is crazy. That's what you have done for the last 5 years....villify those who think differently than you. So pathetically predictable and consistant.

...i dont think Jerry Falwell is insane, and hes 6x the asshole that Ann Coulter is...just by the way they present and carry themselves then start yelling rants and incoherent slurs leads me to believe that there not 100% right int he head

I also love how Coulter makes fun of liberals for being fat, ugly, and hairy while she looks and sounds like a dead deer, that voice and adams apple of hers makes me want to get up and slap her

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » March 3, 2005, 8:40 am

OK I watched it 10 times and I Fail to see where she losses it, The other moron lost it not Ann all she did was mock him and make him look like a idiot but of thats easy to do to a Baby killing Liberal

Mak · Post by **Mak** » March 3, 2005, 9:55 am

I'll have to say I thought it was Combs that was being the unreasonable little twat.

He demands that she comment on some quote that he pulls out of thin air from some guy in Kansas that nobody has ever heard of, then goes batshit insane when she jokingly says he lies.

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » March 3, 2005, 10:07 am

Cartalas wrote:OK I watched it 10 times and I Fail to see where she losses it, The other moron lost it not Ann all she did was mock him and make him look like a idiot but of thats easy to do to a Baby killing Liberal

Shame your mother wasn't one imho.

Ann Coultier is a moron. She would be a moron no matter what "side" she was on. A fanatic no better than religious fanatics like bin Laden.

Midnyte_Ragebringer · Post by **Midnyte_Ragebringer** » March 3, 2005, 10:22 am

Kelshara wrote:
Cartalas wrote:OK I watched it 10 times and I Fail to see where she losses it, The other moron lost it not Ann all she did was mock him and make him look like a idiot but of thats easy to do to a Baby killing Liberal
Shame your mother wasn't one imho.

Ann Coultier is a moron. She would be a moron no matter what "side" she was on. A fanatic no better than religious fanatics like bin Laden.

You can't push everyone you disagree with by calling them fanatics. She is not even close to fanatical. If you weren't so close minded, maybe you could comprehend even a smal percentage of what she is saying.

Lynks · Post by **Lynks** » March 3, 2005, 10:24 am

Tell us oh wise one, what was she saying behind the "ahhhhh ahhhhhh".

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » March 3, 2005, 10:31 am

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:
Kelshara wrote:
Cartalas wrote:OK I watched it 10 times and I Fail to see where she losses it, The other moron lost it not Ann all she did was mock him and make him look like a idiot but of thats easy to do to a Baby killing Liberal
Shame your mother wasn't one imho.

Ann Coultier is a moron. She would be a moron no matter what "side" she was on. A fanatic no better than religious fanatics like bin Laden.
You can't push everyone you disagree with by calling them fanatics. She is not even close to fanatical. If you weren't so close minded, maybe you could comprehend even a smal percentage of what she is saying.

I don't. You are not fanatical. A biggoted waste of space idiot that I pity? Certainly. Fanatical? Not quite.

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » March 3, 2005, 10:47 am

Kelshara wrote:
Cartalas wrote:OK I watched it 10 times and I Fail to see where she losses it, The other moron lost it not Ann all she did was mock him and make him look like a idiot but of thats easy to do to a Baby killing Liberal
Shame your mother wasn't one imho.

Ann Coultier is a moron. She would be a moron no matter what "side" she was on. A fanatic no better than religious fanatics like bin Laden.

So you admit Liberals are baby killers? Thank you for being a big enough man (although I use the description man lightly in your case), to admit it.

Sionistic · Post by **Sionistic** » March 3, 2005, 11:29 am

How about all fucking three of them are morons? Colmes for asking shit like that, ann for losing it when it would of been a simple owning, and fuckface in the middle for going along with it.

Who the fuck watches Hannity and Colmes to begin with?

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » March 3, 2005, 11:39 am

Cartalas wrote: So you admit Liberals are baby killers? Thank you for being a big enough man (although I use the description man lightly in your case), to admit it.

Nah but there are exceptions to every rule. You are a perfect example of that.

Fash · Post by **Fash** » March 3, 2005, 11:52 am

I didn't watch this clip, but I can't even watch Hannity & Colmes...

Alan Colmes makes me want to spaz too.

Sueven · Post by **Sueven** » March 3, 2005, 12:04 pm

Midnyte wrote:She is not even close to fanatical.

Really?

Ann Coulter wrote:We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity.

This is direct support for a literal crusade.

Ann Coulter wrote:When contemplating college liberals, you really regret once again that John Walker is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed, too.

Even if you think it's a great idea to physically intimidate your intellectual opposition, the leap she makes from "executing John Walker" to "making college liberals aware of their mortality" is pretty stunning.

Ann Coulter wrote:Liberalism and Terrorism: Different Stages of the Same Disease

That's the title of one of her essays.

COULTER: I take the biblical idea. God gave us the earth.

PETER FENN (Democratic strategist): Oh, OK.

COULTER: We have dominion over the plants, the animals, the trees.

FENN: This is a great idea.

COULTER: God says, "Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It's yours."

FENN: Terrific. We're Americans, so we should consume as much of the earth's resources...

COULTER: Yes! Yes.

FENN: ... as fast as we possibly can.

COULTER: As opposed to living like the Indians.

No fanaticism at all.

Akaran_D · Post by **Akaran_D** » March 3, 2005, 12:25 pm

Why do I get this feeling she'd probably be a beast in bed?

Lohrno · Post by **Lohrno** » March 3, 2005, 12:31 pm

Akaran_D wrote:Why do I get this feeling she'd probably be a beast in bed?

Because she looks like one? =D

Voronwë · Post by **Voronwë** » March 3, 2005, 12:39 pm

Lohrno wrote:
Akaran_D wrote:Why do I get this feeling she'd probably be a beast in bed?
Because she looks like one? =D

for starters anybody who wants to sleep with her needs to come out of the closet.

secondly, i dont think she "melted down" in the clip, though she did look somewhat incoherrent.

thirdly, anybody who seriously values her commentary is - in my opinion - not that politically astute

.

Animalor · Post by **Animalor** » March 3, 2005, 1:41 pm

Watched it yesterday a few moments after I posted it.

Seems more like she was ambushed by people determined to make her look bad.

Does she always go to these types of things so unprepared?

She had no notes or anything.

Spang · Post by **Spang** » March 3, 2005, 1:45 pm

i watched it. looked like there was an agenda but the hosts weren't following it.

Niffoni · Post by **Niffoni** » March 3, 2005, 3:09 pm

This thread boggles my mind. When the fuck did the liberals become the ones who came up with reasoned arguements while the conservatives can't seem to pull anything out of their asses besides "u r doodyhead rofl i am winnar lol".

Am I in bizzaro world? Or did Kooky just stop posting here?

I refuse to believe that anyone is fucking stupid enough to think Coultier has anything relevant to say about ANYTHING. If you argue that she does, you're either a sociopath (somehow I doubt it), or you have become so used to automatically arguing with anything outside of the party line of whatever political affiliation (read: cult) you worship that you no longer qualify as an actual person with genuine thoughts and opinions, and therefore I can legally cook and eat you.

This woman exists for one purpose only: So that Paris Hilton has someone that she can look at and say "Wow, what a worthless, ignorant bitch".

miir · Post by **miir** » March 3, 2005, 3:52 pm

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:She doesn't share your view....of course you and the rest of the like-minded ones think she is crazy. That's what you have done for the last 5 years....villify those who think differently than you. So pathetically predictable and consistant.

No, she's a fucking nutcase.

I don't share the same views as..oh say... someone like Colin Powell but I respect him and his opinions. I share similar views with Michael Moore but I think he's an idiot.

You should stop 'pigeonholing' people and stop trying to apply partisan politics to every situation.
You're the one that's 'pathetically predictable and consistant', Midnyte.

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » March 3, 2005, 4:30 pm

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:
Kelshara wrote:
Cartalas wrote:OK I watched it 10 times and I Fail to see where she losses it, The other moron lost it not Ann all she did was mock him and make him look like a idiot but of thats easy to do to a Baby killing Liberal
Shame your mother wasn't one imho.

Ann Coultier is a moron. She would be a moron no matter what "side" she was on. A fanatic no better than religious fanatics like bin Laden.
You can't push everyone you disagree with by calling them fanatics. She is not even close to fanatical. If you weren't so close minded, maybe you could comprehend even a smal percentage of what she is saying.

well, she calls liberals EVIL, and says they are guilty of TREASON for not bowing down to everything the almighty government wants to pass, she also at one point wished to "kill" some liberals to physically intimidate the rest of them, if thats not a fanatic i would like to hear from your point of view what one is...

il go as far as to say michael moore is pretty fanatical for trying to somehow connect bush and the 9/11 attackers in the first part of his movie...so midnyte, please name for me ONE american conservative fanatic, i would love to hear who fits your definition of one

Thess · Post by **Thess** » March 4, 2005, 4:20 am

This is a once a year thing for Anne Coulter. If not more...

Zamtuk · Post by **Zamtuk** » March 4, 2005, 4:57 am

Spang wrote:i watched it. looked like there was an agenda but the hosts weren't following it.

actually if i heard the clip correct, it was ann who couldnt follow the agenda. hence the repeated statement, 'you didnt answer the question'

Midnyte_Ragebringer · Post by **Midnyte_Ragebringer** » March 4, 2005, 10:43 am

Zamtuk wrote:
Spang wrote:i watched it. looked like there was an agenda but the hosts weren't following it.
actually if i heard the clip correct, it was ann who couldnt follow the agenda. hence the repeated statement, 'you didnt answer the question'

You'll see similar things on this board, because some people ask stupid loaded questions and then expect an answer and then come back with "you didn't answer the question".....why? Because it wasn't worth an answer.

miir · Post by **miir** » March 4, 2005, 11:09 am

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:You'll see similar things on this board, because some people ask stupid loaded questions and then expect an answer and then come back with "you didn't answer the question".....why? Because it wasn't worth an answer.

And then people like you start calling people liars and go off on psychotic tangents totally derailing any chance of a decent discussion on an issue.

Midnyte_Ragebringer · Post by **Midnyte_Ragebringer** » March 4, 2005, 11:32 am

miir wrote:
Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:You'll see similar things on this board, because some people ask stupid loaded questions and then expect an answer and then come back with "you didn't answer the question".....why? Because it wasn't worth an answer.
And then people like you start calling people liars and go off on psychotic tangents totally derailing any chance of a decent discussion on an issue.

uh-huh

I'm not the one who makes up scenarios like the one you just did, therefore discounting a person all together. But, you and the Dems have a knack for discrediting a person so no matter what they say or do, they won't get credit for it.

Example????

Dems say for decades..."Vote for me...I will fix Social Security!!!!"

Dems say now, because a Republican might fix Social Security..."There is no crisis!!!!"

miir · Post by **miir** » March 4, 2005, 12:49 pm

I rest my case.

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » March 4, 2005, 5:42 pm

miir wrote:I rest my case.

Woot!!! Another meaningless post from our favorite Anal Pound Puppy.

Lohrno · Post by **Lohrno** » March 4, 2005, 6:25 pm

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote: Dems say now, because a Republican might fix Social Security..."There is no crisis!!!!"

Whether or not the Dems say this because there actually is no crisis, or there is, and a Republican might fix it is kind of irrelevant. I've got a healthy dose of cynicsim for politicians at any rate.

However, that said perhaps there really isn't a crisis. Crisis, problem whatever, there is a problem...I don't think Bush's plan is the solution though. I think there is probably something better that can be done.

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » March 4, 2005, 6:25 pm

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:
miir wrote:
Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:You'll see similar things on this board, because some people ask stupid loaded questions and then expect an answer and then come back with "you didn't answer the question".....why? Because it wasn't worth an answer.
And then people like you start calling people liars and go off on psychotic tangents totally derailing any chance of a decent discussion on an issue.
uh-huh

I'm not the one who makes up scenarios like the one you just did, therefore discounting a person all together. But, you and the Dems have a knack for discrediting a person so no matter what they say or do, they won't get credit for it.

Example????

Dems say for decades..."Vote for me...I will fix Social Security!!!!"

Dems say now, because a Republican might fix Social Security..."There is no crisis!!!!"

answer my question midnyte, i cited michael moore as a "fanatical" "liberal", i would like to see you state a somewhat known name of a "fanatical" "conservative" and tell us why he is a fanatic in his/her viewpoints

Midnyte_Ragebringer · Post by **Midnyte_Ragebringer** » March 4, 2005, 7:44 pm

There are plenty of fanaticals on both sides. But, unlike you I don't dismiss everything one person says because they may hold some fanatical beliefs.

Just because Al Gore, Michael Moore, Stuart Smalley, Ted Kennedy, etc. are fanatical lefties, doesn't mean many things they say aren't true, intelligent thoughts and perspectives on the issues of the day.

Fanatical Righties? Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, many christian right leaders, Ann Coultre can be considered one I guess with some of the things she may say, but again, I don't dismiss or write off entire people based on a few things they may have said or done.

Examples? Clinton......traitor to his country by protesting against the war in a foreign country(in my opinion anyway)...but he is a smart man with great charisma and did many great things while in office.

Getting the picture at all?