The effects

What do you think about the world?
Post Reply

How do you think society will be effected by the change of abortion availability

If we make it easier there will be fewer backstreet abortions and the amount of people having sex won't change.
7
21%
If we make it easier more people will choose to have sex, therefore there will be more std's and more people in the position of needing abortions.
1
3%
If we make it more difficult to get an abortion people will be more afraid of the consequences and fewer people will be involved sexually thus lessening the spread of std's and the need for abortions in general.
3
9%
If we make it more difficult we will simply have more backstreet abortions, people throwing themselves down stairs, beating each other with bats and so on.
20
59%
Other, oh yes I know I left some out, please explain : )
3
9%
 
Total votes: 34

User avatar
Tinkin Tankem
Gets Around
Gets Around
Posts: 210
Joined: December 12, 2002, 10:16 pm
Location: Iowa City

The effects

Post by Tinkin Tankem »

In the long run do how do you think things would be effected by changing the abortion laws in some way or another. It won't be a clean and dry cut no matter what we do, it is most surely a double edged sword.
Thinking of something new!
User avatar
Lohrno
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2416
Joined: July 6, 2002, 4:58 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by Lohrno »

I can guaratee that #4 will be the case. More difficult to have abortions would mean more fucked up crap. Regardless of morailty, you have to admit that less people hitting eachother with baseball bats, coathangers, and other things of this nature that are potentially fatal to people is better. It's not like you can outlaw these things either. I mean you can but it's gonna happen anyways.
User avatar
Seebs
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1158
Joined: June 5, 2003, 3:00 pm
Gender: Male

Post by Seebs »

It can never be repealed, but made more difficult.

I'm not sure I want it repealed, it helps define the type of mentality in each party, not a good or bad thing, just a line of demarcation.

Partial Birth Abortions are now illegal.

Next issue, should kids have to inform parents?

Then next issue, move it to first term only abortions ...

Perhaps that appeases both sides enough its no longer an issue.

I know, naive.
Seeber
looking for a WOW server
User avatar
Lohrno
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2416
Joined: July 6, 2002, 4:58 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by Lohrno »

Pregnancy tests can be very inaccurate. Yeah I don't like that it's trying to be pulled into a ban slowly...
Rekaar.
Almost 1337
Almost 1337
Posts: 689
Joined: July 18, 2002, 8:44 pm
Contact:

Post by Rekaar. »

You can't just ban abortion. The change has to come from a societal movement. It has to be taboo to get an abortion. It's the only way to effectively restrict its use now that it has become such a rampant and systemic problem.
Time makes more converts than reason. - Thomas Paine
User avatar
Lohrno
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2416
Joined: July 6, 2002, 4:58 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by Lohrno »

That's what I'm saying. It looks like we are edging that direction. This IMHO is a very bad thing. I am making my opinion known and contributing to the resistance of this in a very small way.
User avatar
Xzion
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2567
Joined: September 22, 2002, 7:36 pm

Post by Xzion »

Rekaar. wrote:You can't just ban abortion. The change has to come from a societal movement. It has to be taboo to get an abortion. It's the only way to effectively restrict its use now that it has become such a rampant and systemic problem.
You conservatives and your taboos, you all have managed to make even something as natural as sex taboo in the US (maybe because you cant get any :shock: )

I say make abortions available to everyone and easily...in reality the world is overpopulated and unwanted fetuses that have the posibility of becoming conseous life are not needed.
If you want to adopt a child, there are thousands of starving, homeless children in asia, south america, africa etc...international adoptions (which are a pain in the ass) need to have less regulation, as well as abortions
-xzionis human mage on mannoroth
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
User avatar
nobody
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1205
Joined: April 2, 2004, 8:37 pm
Location: neither here nor there
Contact:

Post by nobody »

Xzion wrote: I say make abortions available to everyone and easily...in reality the world is overpopulated and unwanted fetuses that have the posibility of becoming conseous life are not needed.
sounds like genocide
My goal is to live forever. So far so good.
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. - Benjamin Franklin

خودتان را بگای
User avatar
Nick
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 5711
Joined: July 4, 2002, 3:45 pm

Post by Nick »

Wow this isn't tiresome at all
User avatar
Tinkin Tankem
Gets Around
Gets Around
Posts: 210
Joined: December 12, 2002, 10:16 pm
Location: Iowa City

Post by Tinkin Tankem »

Tiresome possibly, however I am trying to see what people feel what should be done. Then what would happen in this course of action. People seem to want to make it so clean cut and say that this should happen this or that way. In contrast most decisions major or minor have long lasting effects. These effects may change in the course of time. Thus I feel that if abortion was made more difficult or more governed people may choose not to just have sex with random people and possibly weigh the consequences (sp I'm drunk.) And yes Xzion, I am angry that people are having sex when I am not :(
Thinking of something new!
User avatar
Xzion
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 2567
Joined: September 22, 2002, 7:36 pm

Post by Xzion »

nobody wrote:
Xzion wrote: I say make abortions available to everyone and easily...in reality the world is overpopulated and unwanted fetuses that have the posibility of becoming conseous life are not needed.
sounds like genocide
If the object being "aborted" has no brain or no means to think, feel, or survive on its own its hardly genocide...jacking off and whiping the sperm in a paper towel could be considered genocide by those measures
-xzionis human mage on mannoroth
-zeltharath tauren shaman on wildhammer
Burke
Almost 1337
Almost 1337
Posts: 621
Joined: July 25, 2002, 3:13 pm

Post by Burke »

Thus I feel that if abortion was made more difficult or more governed people may choose not to just have sex with random people and possibly weigh the consequences
What color are the skies in your world? Sex is the Big Motivator (tm). Making them more difficult to obtain will do nothing to slow the rate at which people have sex, random or otherwise.
Voronwë
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 7176
Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:57 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by Voronwë »

poll question is formed poorly.

for starters it skews the results by supposing an ambiguous change in abortion law. many of the responses, while trying to get unambiguous results, are too specific to represent a broad enough audience pool when only 4 choices are given for such an involved topic.
User avatar
Tinkin Tankem
Gets Around
Gets Around
Posts: 210
Joined: December 12, 2002, 10:16 pm
Location: Iowa City

Post by Tinkin Tankem »

I agree that the poll questions are poorly worded. I really couldn't think of a good way to get what I was looking for with any sort of questions. Rather I was looking to use the poll as a way to start the discussion. The "other" option was put in there for that very reason. Really their is no clean cut way of answering the question in one sentance.
Thinking of something new!
User avatar
Nick
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 5711
Joined: July 4, 2002, 3:45 pm

Post by Nick »

Why can you tell someone you don't know they cannot have an abortion? Is it your body? Is it your baby? Is it your business?

The answer is you can't, no, no and no.

I am glad to see only 4 people are actually insensitive enough to think they are in the right by being "Pro Life".

Whatever the fuck that means....who the fuck isn't Pro life? Or you are more pro life for unborn babies than anyone else? That would be what is called a 'double standard'.

There is no "abortion issue" except to the intellectually backward of this world. Oddly enough, I respect your passion, but I boggle at your logic.

Btw this goes out to the people who cannot see reality anymore, not you normal sensible folk on VV!! :lol: 8)
User avatar
nobody
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1205
Joined: April 2, 2004, 8:37 pm
Location: neither here nor there
Contact:

Post by nobody »

Teenybloke wrote: Btw this goes out to the people who cannot see reality anymore, not you normal sensible folk on VV!! :lol: 8)
i take offense to that
My goal is to live forever. So far so good.
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. - Benjamin Franklin

خودتان را بگای
User avatar
Nick
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 5711
Joined: July 4, 2002, 3:45 pm

Post by Nick »

You would!
User avatar
Animalor
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 5902
Joined: July 8, 2002, 12:03 pm
Gender: Male
XBL Gamertag: Anirask
PSN ID: Anirask
Location: Canada

Post by Animalor »

The whole pro-life movement is just another effort by religious groups to force their moral beliefs on folks.

You guys pride yourself on having a free country, let people exercise that freedom the way they see fit.
Post Reply