Can't spell ChOKing without...

Raistin · Post by **Raistin** » January 5, 2005, 4:11 am

OKlahoma. 2 years in a row, in a title game for no good reason. Voters need to wake the hell up and relize OK is just a good 9-3,10-2 team who plays weak teams year in and out. The only big game they have won is aginist Texas. They lost all the other meaningful games.

Texas was the only team they played thats worth a wild. Other than that, you might as well go to the Big East.

Big games? Just choke.

2004, didn't show up. 2003 lose to KANSAS in the Big 12 champ game,only to suck cock to get in to the title game to sneek by a much better USC team to piss it all away to LSU. 2002/2001 lose to OK state to drop out of the top 2 at the end of the year each time.Thank god.

At least I can say my team has blown nuts the past 4 years due to JoePa letting his son totally fuck the Ofence and not be known to choke and lose any meaningful games for titles when STACKED with talent year in and out.

Oh btw, I'm only 50 points off of being the leader for the ESPN Bowl pick game. Sucks I missed the first 5 games. F the Big Ten Mich. and Whisk cost me, thoese 2 games alone Id have won!

Talelor · Post by **Talelor** » January 5, 2005, 5:48 am

Auburn vs. USC would have been more entertaining, but still same result for the opponet. USC is just that good of team, in my personal opinion. If Peterson stays to see his senior year(Hoping he picks up some bulk by then) it might be quite more impressive. Either way, you can't judge a team by the polls, look at WVU...Now that is a weak team, highly over-rated.(Sorry regional hatred)

Deward · Post by **Deward** » January 6, 2005, 12:10 pm

As a Colorado fan, I was quite pleased to see OK get its assed reamed. I'll let them be number one or two every year just to watch them get their asses handed to them again like that.

Voronwë · Post by **Voronwë** » January 6, 2005, 12:22 pm

Auburn would have gotten their ass handed to them just as bad as Oklahoma.

VT should have beaten Auburn honestly.

Xatrei · Post by **Xatrei** » January 6, 2005, 1:51 pm

I don't know about that. I think USC would beat Auburn, but I still think AU would have been more competetive. Lets not forget that VT has the #3 defense in the country (behind #1 AU and #2 USC). They've got a decent offense, and the combination gave both USC and AU a hard time (the USC game was a lot tighter than the 24-13 score indicates).

Unfortunately USC & AU didn't get a chance to play, so who knows.

As a Nebraska fan, OU's performance is embarrassing to the conference. I was pulling for them to keep the #2 spot through the final weeks of the season, which made for a lot of fun conversations down here in Alabama. I was seriously disappointed to see that jOKe of a performance. The only Big 12 team that I will never pull for is the Buffs haha.

Ramseis · Post by **Ramseis** » January 7, 2005, 12:32 am

Had OU not had 4 turnovers we wouldn't be having this discussion. But since they did well we know the outcome now.

Giving gifts to a team like OU did they are bound to give up a lot of points. Just a quick example OU's starting field position in the first half was their own 27. USC's was their own 47.

Tyek · Post by **Tyek** » January 7, 2005, 3:07 am

Had OU not had 4 turnovers we wouldn't be having this discussion. But since they did well we know the outcome now.

Did you watch the game? OK was going to lose, and probably badly. The turnovers helped, but that was complete domination. USC even slowed things down in the 3rd to keep it somewhat under control.

Aevian Dreaklear · Post by **Aevian Dreaklear** » January 7, 2005, 4:10 am

USC turning those turnoverrs into TDs really was a kick in the balls for OUs morale. Without all those mistakes, I'm not sure if the game would be close or not, hard to say. OU looked good on their one drive for the TD, but after the turnovers, they really just packed it in.

Talelor · Post by **Talelor** » January 7, 2005, 4:17 am

Ramseis wrote:Had OU not had 4 turnovers we wouldn't be having this discussion.

4 TO = 28 points.... Correct me if I'm wrong, but that still would have equal'd a loss none the less.

Ramseis · Post by **Ramseis** » January 7, 2005, 4:45 am

Yeah it still equals a loss but its not a blow out at that point. And again we would probably be saying good game (if things ended up that way) instead of saying OU sucks ass why wasn't Auburn in the game.

But people were gonna say that no matter what. This would of kept the Auburn fans from whining less imo.

Tyek · Post by **Tyek** » January 7, 2005, 5:00 am

Yeah and if the 49er's did not lose all those games then they would still have a coach. Woulda, shoulda, coulda. OK had those turnovers because SC caused them. They destroyed them. Period.

Raistin · Post by **Raistin** » January 7, 2005, 6:14 am

Just like I could say if Penn State scored at least 17 points in 4 of the games they lost and 22 points in 3 of the games, they would have gone 12-0.

The _only_ team to not allow any team to score more than 21 points on them. And allowed a 14 PPG. So in OK fans state of mind, I guess Penn State should have been NC since their defense was only second to USC's. !

Aevian Dreaklear · Post by **Aevian Dreaklear** » January 7, 2005, 4:11 pm

Talelor wrote:4 TO = 28 points.... Correct me if I'm wrong, but that still would have equal'd a loss none the less.

After being demoralized from the turnovers, the Sooners just really packed it in and didn't really give a shit anymore on offense or defense. They didn't have the heart and let it get ridiculously out of hand.

Tyek wrote:Yeah and if the 49er's did not lose all those games then they would still have a coach. Woulda, shoulda, coulda. OK had those turnovers because SC caused them. They destroyed them. Period.

Yeah they forced Mark Bradley to field the punt at the 5, off the top of my head I can't remember the WR who fell on his route for one of the other picks. They really didn't cause all those turnovers. But I will content that USC has the better team. Their defense is ridiculously fast and were flying all over the field to the ball.

And yes, if anyone was wondering, the reason I'm on OU's side of this arguement is because I'm at senior at OU.

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » January 7, 2005, 9:07 pm

OU was overrated. And White is so damn overrated it isn't even funny.