Ukraine pulling a US :)

Hesten · Post by **Hesten** » November 23, 2004, 5:58 pm

Well, seems like the US are not the only one to have shady elections with different results from Exit polls.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/11 ... index.html

Officials said that with 99.38 percent of precincts counted, Yanukovych had 49.42 percent to Yushchenko's 46.70 percent.

An exit poll, conducted under a Western-funded program, had given Yushchenko 54 percent of the vote to Yanukovych's 43 percent. Another poll put Yushchenko ahead by 49.4 to 45.9 percent.

Now someone go find the info that the US had observers there, found that claim in a danish newspaper, but not mentioned in this article

Kylere · Post by **Kylere** » November 23, 2004, 11:02 pm

LOL

Exit polls are take by those who want to be polled, using them as a voting comparison is foolish.

Rekaar. · Post by **Rekaar.** » November 23, 2004, 11:32 pm

Your quote proves only that voluntary polls are ultimately worthless.

Seebs · Post by **Seebs** » November 24, 2004, 1:37 pm

Yush vs. Yanu. Best matchup sine Uma vs. Oprah.

The real loser in all this is Yanni who was scheduled to play at the winner's party.

vn_Tanc · Post by **vn_Tanc** » November 24, 2004, 1:41 pm

Your quote proves only that voluntary polls are ultimately worthless

Democratic elections are voluntary polls you twat.

Seebs · Post by **Seebs** » November 24, 2004, 1:44 pm

Best usage of the word Twat I've seen in months. Bravo!

Please use Flesh-purse on your next insult.

Twat .. I love it!! Using that todat at work. Will update later how that goes.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » November 24, 2004, 2:19 pm

Seebs wrote:Best usage of the word Twat I've seen in months. Bravo!

Please use Flesh-purse on your next insult.

Twat .. I love it!! Using that todat at work. Will update later how that goes.

This may need to be a poll but in my experience, Twat > Cunt when it comes to annoying women.

Moonwynd · Post by **Moonwynd** » November 24, 2004, 2:29 pm

I polled my wife Winnow...and Cunt > Twat when it comes to the "degradation" factor according to her. But wtf does she know...she agreed to marry me...so she can't trusted with her judgement.

Spang · Post by **Spang** » November 24, 2004, 2:45 pm

the only thing worse than a male chauvinist pig, is a woman that doesn't do what she's told.

Hesten · Post by **Hesten** » November 24, 2004, 5:04 pm

And yes, here we come, the US dont think the election went on fairly, and threatens the Ukraine:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/11 ... index.html

Well, at least nice to see that even though you cant do an election on your own, you can still judge the rest of the worlds.

Seebs · Post by **Seebs** » November 24, 2004, 5:11 pm

I can hear the arguments now:

Which canditate would this apply to?

I voted for the white pock-faced guy with thick greasy hair and bad teeth wearing a suit from 1987!!

hence the confusion.

Brotha · Post by **Brotha** » November 24, 2004, 5:17 pm

Can we pls shut the fuck up about the exit polls in the US? Seriously, they were way off. No network was willing to use them, they KNEW they were off. Like in Pennsylvania (if I remember correctly) the exit polls said Kerry was winning 60-40- way off of course. The pre-polling done right before election day was pretty much accurate in every single state- so unless you're really imagining a HUGE fucking conspiracy, blindly citing the exit polls in the US as evidence of fraud makes no sense whatsoever.

Rekaar. · Post by **Rekaar.** » November 24, 2004, 6:14 pm

vn_Tanc wrote:
Your quote proves only that voluntary polls are ultimately worthless
Democratic elections are voluntary polls you twat.

And they don't represent any larger subset than the people who participated. Case and point.

vn_Tanc · Post by **vn_Tanc** » November 25, 2004, 7:02 am

And they don't represent any larger subset than the people who participated. Case and point.

What?
So?
I mean what the fuck?
And the phrase is "case in point".
Did you mean "game, set and match"?

Rasspotari · Post by **Rasspotari** » November 25, 2004, 9:34 am

vn_Tanc wrote:
And they don't represent any larger subset than the people who participated. Case and point.
What?
So?
I mean what the fuck?
And the phrase is "case in point".
Did you mean "game, set and match"?

damnit, stop attacking good hardworking republican americans you liberal twat !