archeiron wrote:
However, Bush has been quoted several times as saying that finding Osama bin Laden is no longer a priority. If it isn't clear from his quotes, his focus is not on catching bin Laden.
Try using a little common sense Arch. Don't you think Bush had wet dreams every night of being able to go on TV and say we got Bin Laden? WTF Dude? Take a fucking step and use common sense.
Would you care to explain Bush's comments?
Ummmm....political speak? Do you take every thing people say for face value? If you do, you need to stop right away.
Let's see, 9-11 happened. We knew it was him. We want that MF'er dead. He says so. It's a great rallying cry too. Turns out he is one elusive MF'er. He gets away. We continue to disrupt the Taliban and other terrorists organizations and off shoots, yet still no Bin Laden. Then Bush says it's not only just one man, but attacking the whole group that is truly the most important thing.
This is not hard shit to figure out Arch. I really don't know why you play these games, or why I fall for the bait and waste 8 minutes of my life explaining this elementary school bullshit.
because you don't ever get that our resources for fighting the actual terrorists are being pissed away by trying to correct Iraq. And for every al-qaeda he "disrupts", he recuits two more, not because it's easy to do so, but because the US has made it easy to be a target to hate. And it's your simplistic view of a complicated issue that's the real problem
Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Ummmm....political speak? Do you take every thing people say for face value? If you do, you need to stop right away.
Let's see, 9-11 happened. We knew it was him. We want that MF'er dead. He says so. It's a great rallying cry too. Turns out he is one elusive MF'er. He gets away. We continue to disrupt the Taliban and other terrorists organizations and off shoots, yet still no Bin Laden. Then Bush says it's not only just one man, but attacking the whole group that is truly the most important thing.
This is not hard shit to figure out Arch. I really don't know why you play these games, or why I fall for the bait and waste 8 minutes of my life explaining this elementary school bullshit.
Now, would you care to explain why Iraq should have been the second major focus after Afghanistan, specifically justifying Iraq's threat over anywhere else? Be sure to explain why invasion was absolutely necessary and unavoidable.
Yes, how can you argue we are devoting all of our time and effort we started with, to finding Bin Ladan and all of the "whole group" in Afghanistan, when Bush says Bin Ladan is no longer the main target, and we spread our numbers thinner by invading Iraq for WMDs.. err Oil..
and how exactly do you know how George W. Bush truly feels in his core?
and grats avoiding chid's, arch's and my responce to your last post..
oh and grats contridicting yourself by saying not to take Bush's comments at face value, then saying that what he says he really feels.. which you have no idea whether that's really true or not anyways..
