Ann Coulter hit by pies!

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » October 24, 2004, 7:43 pm

http://www.nbc4i.com/news/3841599/detail.html

great story

Watching it happen on the news was great, unlike her hardcore, redneck imachickthatcankickyourass image, she started wining and running with fright like the little bitch she is

Fat · Post by **Fat** » October 24, 2004, 8:41 pm

She's coming to speak at my school soon

.

-Alfan

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » October 24, 2004, 9:07 pm

Why would anyone bring her in to a school? And to add to that, why would anyone bother listening to her?

Mplor · Post by **Mplor** » October 25, 2004, 1:01 am

I'm so proud of this state right now.

Markulas · Post by **Markulas** » October 25, 2004, 1:07 am

Listening to her?

Try reading her book.

Kaldaur · Post by **Kaldaur** » October 25, 2004, 2:00 am

Fat, are you talking about a college or a high school? College is understandable, more freedom of opinion there. But I can hardly see the educational value in bringing someone like Ann Coulter to a high school.

Lohrno · Post by **Lohrno** » October 25, 2004, 2:17 am

Fat wrote:She's coming to speak at my school soon .

-Alfan

I think if I were you I would be baking several pies and practicing aim. Key lime pies are a good choice.

The arrest would kind of suck, but it would be so worth it.

-=Lohrno

Canelek · Post by **Canelek** » October 25, 2004, 5:30 am

Not quite sure who she is, but it is a shame when an invited speaker is accosted for whatever reason--cept maybe for outright racist speakers.

From the article, I see that she is conservative and praised conservative students while bashing kerry. Well... what is the big deal then? Do not liberal speakers bash Bush and conservatives? YES on both counts. That is called politics kids and if you can't sit back and deal with it or just change the station (for the TV viewers), then you have no place in that business.

Partisan politics is utterly devoid of any real thought--it is all based upon perceived righteousness on either side. A pie in the face for speaking freely? Yeah, nice work college fuckwads. WTG.

Now, if someone is perhaps speaking in a non-primary partisan format, let's say, uhhh, a KKK member or other radical...yeah, hit em with what ya got--they have no productive base in society--only breeding hate against the people (American people as an example, as this is the focus atm.)

Now, I am not talking about foreign or domestic issues, and certainly not about who I think should win the upcoming election. This is all about some assclowns accosting an invited guest on stage at whatever-U.

I will make a point to look the name of this person up this week to determine how much of an asshole she is, but my point had nothing to do with assholishness, it has EVERYTHING to do with not spitting in the face of people speaking their minds. Do you cheer for the people that spike trees also?

Jice Virago · Post by **Jice Virago** » October 25, 2004, 5:57 am

Speaking as a social liberal/fiscal conservative who is voting for Anyone But Bush, I laugh at this. I would also laugh just as hard at someone hitting Michael Moore in the face with a pie if he was stupid enough to blast extremist rhetoric in a place of higher learning. I am of the opinion that there is no place for these kind of people corrupting young people's minds in public educational institutions.

Canelek · Post by **Canelek** » October 25, 2004, 6:09 am

If she is of the Michael Moore slant, I will have to give up a (limited)chuckle as well. However, it is NOT cool to shit on the right for INVITED guest speakers to speak their mind(s). Would you throw something at a speaker who you did not politically agree with?

Hell, I have seen a gazillion partisan speakers--about 1/10th of which I actually somewhat agreed with, but have NEVER accosted them in any way, not that I haven't secretly wished for it... but it is completely against what we are all about as Americans to do harm to those exercising their rights.

Once again, I have no clue who this Coultier chick is, I am just jabbing from a base point, but I (think) my point is pretty clear on the matter.

Dregor Thule · Post by **Dregor Thule** » October 25, 2004, 7:01 am

Why do I have this sudden urge for some fish?

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » October 25, 2004, 7:50 am

Canelek wrote:If she is of the Michael Moore slant, I will have to give up a (limited)chuckle as well. However, it is NOT cool to shit on the right for INVITED guest speakers to speak their mind(s). Would you throw something at a speaker who you did not politically agree with?

Hell, I have seen a gazillion partisan speakers--about 1/10th of which I actually somewhat agreed with, but have NEVER accosted them in any way, not that I haven't secretly wished for it... but it is completely against what we are all about as Americans to do harm to those exercising their rights.

Once again, I have no clue who this Coultier chick is, I am just jabbing from a base point, but I (think) my point is pretty clear on the matter.

Well, she is actually MORE extreme then michael moore.

At some points she has suggested a death penanlty to liberals, since there all guilty of treason, and killing a few of them off would "phisically intimidate" them

Sylvos · Post by **Sylvos** » October 25, 2004, 9:58 am

regardless of political affilation, a pie to the face is always a good for a laugh.

gg slapstick politics.

Cracc · Post by **Cracc** » October 25, 2004, 10:10 am

mmmm the pie.

Fat · Post by **Fat** » October 25, 2004, 10:25 am

College. I attend Miami University (located in Southern Ohio). The college Republicans are bringing her to "rally the vote" and the college Democrats are going to protest her.

The college Republicans here are quite the little machine. They are extremely well organized, financed, and out in great numbers. The college Democrats can barely keep pace.

-Alfan

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » October 25, 2004, 10:37 am

The democrats are too busy doing keg stands in the frat houses to be organized. The college democrats are too.

Marbus · Post by **Marbus** » October 25, 2004, 10:51 am

Personally I think it's halarious. Both she and Moore were recently at the University of Central Arkansas to speak. From my friend who went to both, she was much more intense and down right meaner than Moore... and most of the people who told me that were conservatives. If I had been there I might have hit her with a pie as well

Marb

miir · Post by **miir** » October 25, 2004, 11:31 am

She's a vicious and hateful neocon extremist.

Ann Coulter wrote:We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed too. Otherwise they will turn out to be outright traitors

She's a fucking nutjob but for some reason conservatives and republicans just love her....

Ann Coulter wrote:Liberals hate America, they hate ‘flag-wavers,’ they hate abortion opponents, they hate all religions except Islam. Even Islamic terrorists don’t hate America like liberals do.

She's not even in the same league as michael moore.
At least Moore tries to disguise (and sell) his opinion as comedy.

It would be pretty foolish to pie Michael Moore... He would just inhale the incoming pie, sucking it right out of mid-air.

Burke · Post by **Burke** » October 25, 2004, 11:42 am

Reason #364 why pie>cake.

Avestan · Post by **Avestan** » October 25, 2004, 2:22 pm

Xzion wrote:
Canelek wrote:If she is of the Michael Moore slant, I will have to give up a (limited)chuckle as well. However, it is NOT cool to shit on the right for INVITED guest speakers to speak their mind(s). Would you throw something at a speaker who you did not politically agree with?

Hell, I have seen a gazillion partisan speakers--about 1/10th of which I actually somewhat agreed with, but have NEVER accosted them in any way, not that I haven't secretly wished for it... but it is completely against what we are all about as Americans to do harm to those exercising their rights.

Once again, I have no clue who this Coultier chick is, I am just jabbing from a base point, but I (think) my point is pretty clear on the matter.
Well, she is actually MORE extreme then michael moore.

At some points she has suggested a death penanlty to liberals, since there all guilty of treason, and killing a few of them off would "phisically intimidate" them

Brainiac, you think shemight have been sarcastic here? I have heard her speak and while she may be far right, she would not say this. How old are you?

Avestan · Post by **Avestan** » October 25, 2004, 2:24 pm

Burke wrote:Reason #364 why pie>cake.

http://www.zazzle.com/link.asp?associat ... 1660975882

miir · Post by **miir** » October 25, 2004, 2:34 pm

Brainiac, you think shemight have been sarcastic here? I have heard her speak and while she may be far right, she would not say this. How old are you?

Although Xzion totally twisted what she said, her comment was not sarcastic. She was being dead serious when she said :

When contemplating college liberals, you really regret once again that John Walker is not getting the death penalty. We need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed too. Otherwise they will turn out to be outright traitors

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » October 25, 2004, 5:48 pm

Avestan wrote:
Xzion wrote:
Canelek wrote:If she is of the Michael Moore slant, I will have to give up a (limited)chuckle as well. However, it is NOT cool to shit on the right for INVITED guest speakers to speak their mind(s). Would you throw something at a speaker who you did not politically agree with?

Hell, I have seen a gazillion partisan speakers--about 1/10th of which I actually somewhat agreed with, but have NEVER accosted them in any way, not that I haven't secretly wished for it... but it is completely against what we are all about as Americans to do harm to those exercising their rights.

Once again, I have no clue who this Coultier chick is, I am just jabbing from a base point, but I (think) my point is pretty clear on the matter.
Well, she is actually MORE extreme then michael moore.

At some points she has suggested a death penanlty to liberals, since there all guilty of treason, and killing a few of them off would "phisically intimidate" them
Brainiac, you think shemight have been sarcastic here? I have heard her speak and while she may be far right, she would not say this. How old are you?

jesus dude, read Miirs post just two post above yours for some of her quotes. I hope shes not serious, but such statements regardless of intention are fucking fanatical....the irony is if she was a liberal equivalent she would probrably be behind a jail cell right now via patriot act

and miir, i didnt remember the exact quote but i dont see how i twisted it

Execute in her usage=death penalty

Execute liberal=death penalty to liberal
physically intimidate liberals=i remembered that part

Markulas · Post by **Markulas** » October 25, 2004, 7:34 pm

Have someone with a brain or lets just say a political science degree and have them read over some of her books. They're an insult to intelligence itself. Yes we all have free speech and we also have the freedom to throw fucking pies with punishment.

Lalanae · Post by **Lalanae** » October 25, 2004, 8:57 pm

poor pies

Sionistic · Post by **Sionistic** » October 25, 2004, 10:41 pm

its unfortunate, that a woman as attractive as her, can be such a fucking psycho that even I wouldnt hit.
"Fuck me sion, fuck me harder than the liberal communists have fucked middle america!"

Xzion · Post by **Xzion** » October 26, 2004, 7:42 am

Sionistic wrote:its unfortunate, that a woman as attractive as her, can be such a fucking psycho that even I wouldnt hit.
"Fuck me sion, fuck me harder than the liberal communists have fucked middle america!"

ehh shes attractive??, damn man you have some standards...
When i saw her on msnbc yesterday she looked like she had an adams apple and has been smoking for 40 years

Lynks · Post by **Lynks** » October 26, 2004, 9:23 am

http://www.ifilm.com/viralvideo?ifilmid=2653684

Its kinda lame, she barely got hit. By the looks of it, only her elbow. Kids today...they know how to fire a gun, but they cant shoot a pie at someone with a fair amount of accuracy 5 feet away.

Sionistic · Post by **Sionistic** » October 26, 2004, 9:39 am

http://home.ec.rr.com/djacksonjr/acgreen.jpg
shes not ugly at all, sure ive seen much hotter girls, but the only thing the pains me about her is when she opens her mouth

Rivera Bladestrike · Post by **Rivera Bladestrike** » October 26, 2004, 9:55 am

Lynks wrote:http://www.ifilm.com/viralvideo?ifilmid=2653684

Its kinda lame, she barely got hit. By the looks of it, only her elbow. Kids today...they know how to fire a gun, but they cant shoot a pie at someone with a fair amount of accuracy 5 feet away.

If you noticed there is a classic "Masters of Lebowski" film on there too, very funny.

Lynks · Post by **Lynks** » October 26, 2004, 10:31 am

It's the first one I watched after the pie thing.

*~*stragi*~* · Post by ***~*stragi*~*** » October 26, 2004, 12:02 pm

too bad the pies didn't explode. or have knives in them

miir · Post by **miir** » October 26, 2004, 12:08 pm

Stragi wrote:too bad the pies didn't explode. or have knives in them

Stargi is Ann Coulter!

miir · Post by **miir** » October 26, 2004, 12:12 pm

Sionistic wrote:http://home.ec.rr.com/djacksonjr/acgreen.jpg
shes not ugly at all, sure ive seen much hotter girls, but the only thing the pains me about her is when she opens her mouth

Dude, shes a freakish pig.

Look at those fucking hands!!!!!

Jice Virago · Post by **Jice Virago** » October 26, 2004, 12:57 pm

Shes an attention whore, plain and simple. Classic example of someone using their T&A and bleeting out extreme statements to garner attention. If she wasn't an attractive woman (subjective, to those trailor trash who treat her little rants like some kind of modern gospel) she would be just another ingorant loud mouthed white trash shitstain. She is all bark and no bite, anyhow. Cap on Moore all you want, but at least he presents a coherent view backed by research, not a bunch of bitching and chest thumping partisan nonsense.

Sylvos · Post by **Sylvos** » October 26, 2004, 1:38 pm

those are HUGE hands holy crap
why didn't she play basketball?

miir · Post by **miir** » October 26, 2004, 1:46 pm

Sylvos wrote:those are HUGE hands holy crap
why didn't she play basketball?

Is there a National Transsexual Basketball League?

Aslanna · Post by **Aslanna** » October 26, 2004, 1:51 pm

My.. What big hands you have!

Rekaar. · Post by **Rekaar.** » October 26, 2004, 2:07 pm

Jice Virago wrote: Cap on Moore all you want, but at least he presents a coherent view backed by research, not a bunch of bitching and chest thumping partisan nonsense.

You feel pretty confident about that statement do you? I'm not saying she's any better, but if Moore does any research he certainly doesn't let the truth get in the way of his point.

Midnyte_Ragebringer · October 26, 2004, 2:18 pm

Jice Virago wrote: Cap on Moore all you want, but at least he presents a coherent view backed by research, not a bunch of bitching and chest thumping partisan nonsense.

Watch the hype-911. Then tell me if you still feel that way. After you see how he doctored and falsified a newspaper article, without their permission, so it read the way he wanted it to read, then tell me if you still think that. Two sides Jice....two sides.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » October 26, 2004, 2:34 pm

Sylvos wrote:those are HUGE hands holy crap
why didn't she play basketball?

That wasn't a twist off bottle cap she just opened!

Homercles · Post by **Homercles** » October 26, 2004, 3:11 pm

Man Hands.... shes got Man Hands!

Jice Virago · Post by **Jice Virago** » October 26, 2004, 3:26 pm

Moore spins the facts. This is not disputable. There is a difference between representing factual information in a partisan way (see F911, the Factor, ect) and just plain making shit up to rant against your enemies. Its the difference between how, for a local conservative example, Metanis structures his arguments vs how Cartalas does the same. That is to say, Metanis provides his opinion and cites facts and reasons as to why he has such an opinion. Cartalas just jibber jabbers partisan catch phrases and ignorant bullshit in the same situation. While I feel they are both equally full of shit, I am willing to examine Metanis's statements and occasionally even concede on some of his more supported points as his posts are at the very least thought provoking. Ergo, Cartalas is a complete waste of mine (and everyone elses) time to listen to, much less reason with.

F911, no matter what your opinion of it, used factual sources and material to demonstrate Moore's point of view and anyone who watched it was compelled to discuss the subject matter. Much as I hate to admit it, lately the Factor has been pretty much the same way. Coulter is just spewing "kill teh liberalz!" nonsense with no real basis in reality, purely catering to the trailer park element of the GOP voter base.

Midnyte_Ragebringer · October 26, 2004, 4:08 pm

Jice Virago wrote:F911, no matter what your opinion of it, used factual sources and material to demonstrate Moore's point of view and anyone who watched it was compelled to discuss the subject matter.

Like I said before, watch hype 9-11 and then say that.

Coulter is just spewing "kill teh liberalz!" nonsense with no real basis in reality, purely catering to the trailer park element of the GOP voter base.

You're not really listening.

miir · Post by **miir** » October 26, 2004, 4:16 pm

Why should we bother?

The biggest critics of F9/11 were people that never even saw the movie. People that have no idea what it was really about.

If the biggest 'lie' that 'hype 9/11' guy could find was a doctored newspaper article, then you'd have to conclude that the rest of the movie was just typical Michael Moore spin.

miir · Post by **miir** » October 26, 2004, 4:18 pm

OH MY GOD HERE IS THE GREAT BIG EARTH SHATTERING LIE FROM F9/11

A scene early in the movie shows newspaper headlines related to the contested 2000 presidential election. It includes a shot of The Pantagraph's Dec. 19, 2001, front page, with the prominent headline, "Latest Florida recount shows Gore won election."

The newspaper says that headline never appeared on that day. The paper said the headline appeared in a Dec. 5, 2001, edition but was not used on the front page. Instead, it was found in much smaller type above a letter to the editor, which the paper says reflects "only the opinions of the letter writer

The Pantagraph newspaper in Bloomington said Friday it sent a letter to Moore and the film's distributor, Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., asking for an apology for using what it said was a doctored front page in his movie.

The paper is seeking $1 in damages

miir · Post by **miir** » October 26, 2004, 4:28 pm

Here is the 'headline' in question:

Nowhere is it indicated that this is a 'front page' story.
A headline in the 'letters' section contained this headline (albiet on a different date than indicated in the film... which is practically illegible).
This image was on the screen for roughly 3 seconds.

Midnyte_Ragebringer · October 26, 2004, 4:33 pm

Typical liberal.....trying to justify the wrong doings of those he sides with.

"OMG SO WHAT IF HE LIED!!!! IT WAS TO BASH BUSH, SO IT IS OKAY!!!"

Canelek · Post by **Canelek** » October 26, 2004, 4:38 pm

After looking into it a bit, yeah, she is a whackjob. Perhaps we can get Big Hands and Moore into a cagematch and have knife-pies dropped in from above.

miir · Post by **miir** » October 26, 2004, 4:42 pm

Midnyte_Ragebringer wrote:Typical liberal.....trying to justify the wrong doings of those he sides with.

"OMG SO WHAT IF HE LIED!!!! IT WAS TO BASH BUSH, SO IT IS OKAY!!!"

Other than the 'date', how is it a lie?

I've seen some sources stating the date was the 10th, while others stated it was the 19th. Are those sources lying as well?