(yeah, it's a local paper, blow me)
My thoughts, after reading the article."On the Issues: What increases, if any, do you favor in the $5.15 an hour federal minimum wage?"
Bush: "My first goal is to make sure that every American who wants to work can find a job. I would consider any reasonable proposal that phases in an increase in the federal minimum wage over an extended period of time - provided that it does not place unreasonable costs on small buisnesses or other job creators."
Kerry: "As president, I will raise the minimum wage from $5.15 to $$7 by 2007, giving a raise to nearly 15 million workers. Doesn't President Bush see that the minimum wage has fallen further and further behind the cost of living, and the impact of the last increase has been wiped away by inflation?"
1: Bush doesn't say what his goal is to raise it to or give a timetable. Good dodge on that aspect - I would prefer hard numbers.
2: Kerry GIVES the hard numbers, but calculate the costs of that as to how it would aeffect a small buisness employing 10 people, each working 40hr weeks ($2800 every week, before taxes vs $2060 a week, before taxes). You're looking at an added payroll expense of 740 a week; 1480 every payroll period. Where does he think the buisness is going to recoup its losses?
As a guy that's making only slightly above minimum wage working for a recognized, global corporation (yay sears. rah freaking rah.) I'm not against an increase in the minimum wage - I mean, my bosses can afford it. But they won't like it. They'll probably even fire another person in my department to make up for it - maybe me.
What will likely happen with any such change with the minimum wage is for prices to go up, and offered hours to go down. The ideal behind this is a sound one - give people more money so they can afford to buy more. However, it also has the end run effect of forcing them to spend more to buy what they are now - this won't stop inflation, this will only help it. Even worse, assuming that hours are cut to maintain a blanance on payday (reduce hours so that they are still earning the same ammount of cash) there will still be a percieved cost adjustment on goods and services that would take place to counter any percieved necessity of raising the price.
Thoughts?