*sigh* whatever, go ahead and play fucking games with semantics. The court decided the admissibility of certain blocks of votes and the whole fucking "hanging chad" thing, the court did not declare a President. The vote was still determined by the electoral process.Thess wrote:Actually you are wrong. The united states supreme court declared who our president was - going around florida state law and stopping the recount.Tenuvil wrote:Oh my fucking Christ go back to your Civics class or brush up on your American election law. Because of the electoral system used to elect Presidents in the US, it is possible for a candidate to have a popular majority yet lose based on electoral votes. As we all know this happened in 2000. It happened one other time in the 19th century if I recall.Acies wrote:Unlike him illegally taking office?
Let me repeat this reaaallly slow for you. IT WASN'T ILLEGAL. The process followed the law to the letter. Sorry if you don't like the outcome.
PS: I think Bush is a fundie tool that can't tie his shoes without help and I blame the Dems for putting Bush into office in 2000 by running the damaged android called Gor(e) against him.
And since when does state law supersede federal law?