PC upgrade
Moderator: TheMachine
- Rikk Wolvenkin
- Gets Around

- Posts: 145
- Joined: July 16, 2002, 12:48 pm
- Contact:
PC upgrade
I'm ready to replace my athalon 1Ghz thunderbird. I'm planning on getting an athalon XP 2500 - 3200 depending on prices. What I need help with is the mobo to use. I'm thinking about either MSI or ASUS but what confuses me are the different chipsets to choose from. Anyone able to give me some guidance towards or away from any particular chipset for an AMD based machine?
I don't want an integrated GPU, and I'll probably switch to DDR.
I don't want an integrated GPU, and I'll probably switch to DDR.
Hunter Warder - Veeshan
I really like the ASUS boards. I have an A7V 333 DDR board, which may or may not still be available, but it's been a great board for me.
I would offer a suggestion that going with a P4 would be worth your while right now. For the advantages you can get through hyperthreading and not having the inherent heating problems that comes with AMD, you'll probably be very satisfied.
I would offer a suggestion that going with a P4 would be worth your while right now. For the advantages you can get through hyperthreading and not having the inherent heating problems that comes with AMD, you'll probably be very satisfied.
Two weeks ago, I bought the Gigabyte GA-K8N Pro for the 64 Bit Athlon 3000. It supports:
- HyperTransport
DDR RAM at 400+ MHz
8X AGP
Up to 1000MB/s LAN on-board
IEEE 1394
ATA 133 with Raid controller on-board.
Last edited by Shaerra on February 27, 2004, 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
THE LARGE PRINT GIVETH
The fine print taketh away.
The fine print taketh away.
- Dregor Thule
- Super Poster!

- Posts: 5994
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 8:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Xathlak
- PSN ID: dregor77
- Location: Oakville, Ontario
rofl i just use the el-cheapo ecs k7s5a's you can get at fry's electronics for like $40. I've had less problems with thse boards then when i was running $200 asus boards.
but that coul also be the chipset.. everything i used prior was VIA based.. the ecs is SiS based and seems to be much much more stable..
If i can avoid it i will never use a via based motherboard again.
but that coul also be the chipset.. everything i used prior was VIA based.. the ecs is SiS based and seems to be much much more stable..
If i can avoid it i will never use a via based motherboard again.
I hate those boards, there's a reason why they are $40 at Fry's. I had disk controller failures on 3 of these in a year.Ajran wrote:rofl i just use the el-cheapo ecs k7s5a's you can get at fry's electronics for like $40. I've had less problems with thse boards then when i was running $200 asus boards.
but that coul also be the chipset.. everything i used prior was VIA based.. the ecs is SiS based and seems to be much much more stable..
If i can avoid it i will never use a via based motherboard again.
I use Epox boards now and find them much more reliable than any others.
I just bought a dell dimension 2400 for my wife. . .she didnt need much and if you register as a small business, you can buy them without an operating system (I already had XP pro). With 1 Gig of Ram and a $20 upgrade for sound blaster, I paid $409 including shipping.
Not bad methinks.
Given, there is no graphics card, but it does have integrated 10/100 and a 2.4 GHz Celeron. Was all she needed and that was cheap as shit.
Not bad methinks.
Given, there is no graphics card, but it does have integrated 10/100 and a 2.4 GHz Celeron. Was all she needed and that was cheap as shit.
- Drolgin Steingrinder
- Way too much time!

- Posts: 3510
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 5:28 pm
- Gender: Male
- PSN ID: Drolgin
- Location: Århus, Denmark
So far, I've been more than happy with myMSI K7N2 Delta-ILSR. Affordable (although a bit of a power hog) and has a bunch of nice features if you're into o/c'ing.
IT'S HARD TO PUT YOUR FINGER ON IT; SOMETHING IS WRONG
I'M LIKE THE UNCLE WHO HUGGED YOU A LITTLE TOO LONG
I'M LIKE THE UNCLE WHO HUGGED YOU A LITTLE TOO LONG
- Pherr the Dorf
- Way too much time!

- Posts: 2913
- Joined: January 31, 2003, 9:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sonoma County Calimifornia
Ok I got an issue on my new system
mb-as-p4p800/deluxe Motherboard, Asus, P4P800 Deluxe, 865PE
Chipset, 800/533/400 FSB, Serial ATA, 8x AGP,p4-3.0 CPU, Intel 3.0Ghz, 512k Cache, 800FSB
I installed a Leadtek A350 XT (geforce 5900) and it is claiming on startup that I don't have enough power going to my video card....
mb-as-p4p800/deluxe Motherboard, Asus, P4P800 Deluxe, 865PE
Chipset, 800/533/400 FSB, Serial ATA, 8x AGP,p4-3.0 CPU, Intel 3.0Ghz, 512k Cache, 800FSB
I installed a Leadtek A350 XT (geforce 5900) and it is claiming on startup that I don't have enough power going to my video card....
The first duty of a patriot is to question the government
Jefferson
Jefferson
Dumb question... But does that card have an extra power plug that takes power from the power supply? My ATI has that and wont work if it's not plugged in but I don't know anything about the nVidia ones.Pherr the Dorf wrote:Ok I got an issue on my new system
mb-as-p4p800/deluxe Motherboard, Asus, P4P800 Deluxe, 865PE
Chipset, 800/533/400 FSB, Serial ATA, 8x AGP,p4-3.0 CPU, Intel 3.0Ghz, 512k Cache, 800FSB
I installed a Leadtek A350 XT (geforce 5900) and it is claiming on startup that I don't have enough power going to my video card....
Have You Hugged An Iksar Today?
--
--
you need at least a 350 watt power supply for a geforce 5900. the standard you get in most cases are 300. if you have a 300 watt power supply the most common error you are going to see is not enough power to the video card.
the next generation of nvidia cards are going to need their own hydroelectric dam.
the next generation of nvidia cards are going to need their own hydroelectric dam.
Just a warning guys, do NOT buy ECS motherboards. I did that at first, and due to defective motherboard (appearantly several shipments got some stupid little connector wired wrong, so the comp get unstable if you use more than 1 RAM slot) and incompetent tech guys at the store i bought it in it costed me 2 months without a decent PC because i didnt buy Asus right away.
"Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich"
- Pherr the Dorf
- Way too much time!

- Posts: 2913
- Joined: January 31, 2003, 9:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sonoma County Calimifornia
Heh well I figured it out and thanks, I am running a 400w power supply, but apparetnly when I was p[utting the side back on the case my side fan wire got snagged and pulled the extra power cable loose.. or simply put, I am a fucking dumbasskyoukan wrote:you need at least a 350 watt power supply for a geforce 5900. the standard you get in most cases are 300. if you have a 300 watt power supply the most common error you are going to see is not enough power to the video card.
the next generation of nvidia cards are going to need their own hydroelectric dam.
The first duty of a patriot is to question the government
Jefferson
Jefferson

