I heard a little blurb of Stern this morning...

Fallanthas · Post by **Fallanthas** » November 20, 2003, 5:34 pm

Kyou is never stupid, somethign I can't say about many here.

Unfortunately, she beleives her own press a bit too much and likes to hop on the flamewagon on topics she doesn't know dick about.

I can appreciate not following the crowd, but flaming for popularitys sake is childish.

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » November 20, 2003, 5:37 pm

masteen wrote:
Krimson Klaw wrote:Most of the time Kyoukan and I agree and there is no problem and you won't hear much, it's when we disagree that fur starts flying. But I like it like that and she hates the fact that I exist and even post here. But I'm the brother of the *little engine that could give a %$#@*. I think she's pretty cool believe it or not, and funny, but that's just me.
There wouldn't be a problem if you weren't such a fucking Uncle Tom sellout!

Yeah, and frankly.. Kyou more tends to respond to personal attacks with elevated personal attacks and it spirals up from there.. Where as Krimson just calls everyone names that he disagrees with straight away, with no real provocation, just because he's a trolling cuntbag

Atokal · Post by **Atokal** » November 20, 2003, 5:46 pm

kyoukan wrote:wow the worthless fucking trolls are out en masse this morning. must have been a full moon last night.

I contribute more to these fucking forums than any 10 of you shitbirds combined.

Har Har

Kooky getting pissed about peeps calling her names and insulting her intelligence. You make it sound as though your contributions are worthy of anything more than pity, they are not.

Won't be long before the stolen video of Brittany and Justin appears.

masteen · Post by **masteen** » November 20, 2003, 5:47 pm

WHO WILL EMERGE VICTORIOUS AS VV'S BITCH QUEEN OF 2003?!?!

Skogen · Post by **Skogen** » November 20, 2003, 5:50 pm

I like this thread. It has potential.

Rivera Bladestrike · November 20, 2003, 5:56 pm

Does anyone actually read Kyoukan's posts? I kinda just scroll past them, its always the same inane bullshit responses that she could have very well copied and pasted from a few months ago from a similar argument. No one would notice of course because Kyoukan's style is so clear cut.

Step 1 - Impose retarded anti-everything ideals (on topic)
Step 2 - Rebuttal (on topic)
Step 3 - Insult someone (off topic)
and then repeat step 3 until said thread dies.

I think if Kyoukan just said random words that didn't even form a sentense she'd get scrolled over less...

Example: Ship arizona box pillow zinc cream.
Example: Dream growth wall glass straw modem.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » November 20, 2003, 5:58 pm

this thread rules. it is like you all share a brain. people I've never even heard of are railing on me.

Sionistic · Post by **Sionistic** » November 20, 2003, 6:00 pm

Rivera Bladestrike wrote: Example: Ship arizona box pillow zinc cream.
Example: Dream growth wall glass straw modem.

Sihp azirnoa box polilw znic ceram
Deram gworth wlal gsals sratw mdoem

Hell those are a lot funner to read

Deward · Post by **Deward** » November 20, 2003, 6:05 pm

Sorry to get back to the original topic but does everyone remember the disappointment of Cindy Crawford in Playboy? They made this huge deal of her being in it and she ended up showing almost no skin. Just some see through one pieces. I could see the same shit happening here. Britney would probably do that for a million bucks. She's been nearly naked already and seems to be following the Madonna trail to super stardom.

Pahreyia · Post by **Pahreyia** » November 20, 2003, 6:09 pm

kyoukan wrote:this thread rules. it is like you all share a brain. people I've never even heard of are railing on me.

The funny thing is... You talk about the "majority" opinion an awful lot when speaking about the US, specifically GWBush. And once the "majority" starts to critique you for your lack of insightful posts lately, you pull the great Canadian spin and attack the people, not the topic.

You'd last all of about 10 seconds on Bill O'Rielly's show.

(Love or hate the guy, he's got a way of getting the pertainant info out of a person and leaving the bullshit in the wake.)

Vetiria · Post by **Vetiria** » November 20, 2003, 6:10 pm

Is the Bill O'Reilly comment supposed to be an insult? Even the people he agrees with don't get to talk more than 10 seconds.

Krimson Klaw · Post by **Krimson Klaw** » November 20, 2003, 6:15 pm

Why can I see Rivera Bladestrikes posts even though I have him on ignore, mods, chop chop@!

Sionistic · Post by **Sionistic** » November 20, 2003, 6:19 pm

wait, kyo annoys you, yet you have riv on ignore and not her?

Krimson Klaw · Post by **Krimson Klaw** » November 20, 2003, 6:26 pm

I had Riv on ignore for being stupid with me a few months ago. As far as kyoukan is concerned, if she did not post here, then I never would have started. She keeps a few of us around believe it or not whether we agree or disagree on topics.

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » November 20, 2003, 6:27 pm

Vetiria wrote:Is the Bill O'Reilly comment supposed to be an insult? Even the people he agrees with don't get to talk more than 10 seconds.

O'Reilly is amusing, but he seems to take whatever side of the issue will give him the most animated discussion. The Daily Show is a more informative news source.

His staple of question appears to be on the lines of; "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" or "So you say that wife beating is normal."

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » November 20, 2003, 6:30 pm

masteen wrote:WHO WILL EMERGE VICTORIOUS AS VV'S BITCH QUEEN OF 2003?!?!

wtf happened to the monkey thread!

Shaerra is my favorite bitch queen! I'm hoping for a 2004 comeback run at the title. Her fewer CAPS per flame ratio owns kyoukan!

Krimson Klaw · Post by **Krimson Klaw** » November 20, 2003, 6:32 pm

Usually your avatars rock, that one is weird, change it!

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » November 20, 2003, 6:39 pm

Pahreyia wrote:The funny thing is... You talk about the "majority" opinion an awful lot when speaking about the US, specifically GWBush. And once the "majority" starts to critique you for your lack of insightful posts lately, you pull the great Canadian spin and attack the people, not the topic

what the hell? could you form that into a statement that smart people can understand?

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » November 20, 2003, 6:47 pm

kyoukan wrote:
Pahreyia wrote:The funny thing is... You talk about the "majority" opinion an awful lot when speaking about the US, specifically GWBush. And once the "majority" starts to critique you for your lack of insightful posts lately, you pull the great Canadian spin and attack the people, not the topic
what the hell? could you form that into a statement that smart people can understand?

Pahreyia Did your just not smart enought to understand.

Pahreyia · Post by **Pahreyia** » November 20, 2003, 7:12 pm

kyoukan wrote:
Pahreyia wrote:The funny thing is... You talk about the "majority" opinion an awful lot when speaking about the US, specifically GWBush. And once the "majority" starts to critique you for your lack of insightful posts lately, you pull the great Canadian spin and attack the people, not the topic
what the hell? could you form that into a statement that smart people can understand?

spin ( P ) Pronunciation Key (spn)
v. spun, (spn) spin·ning, spins
v. tr.

1. To draw out and twist (fibers) into thread.
2. To form (thread or yarn) in this manner.
3. To form (a web or cocoon, for example) by extruding viscous filaments.
4. To make or produce by or as if by drawing out and twisting.
5. To relate or create: spun tales for the children.
6. To prolong or extend: spin out a visit with an old friend.
7. To cause to rotate swiftly; twirl.
8. To shape or manufacture by a twirling or rotating process.
9. To provide an interpretation of (a statement or event, for example), especially in a way meant to sway public opinion: “a messenger who spins bogus research into a vile theology of hatred” (William A. Henry III).
10. Slang. To play (a phonograph record or records), especially as a disc jockey.

Post by **Sylvus** » November 20, 2003, 7:18 pm

Which part of that sentence asked for a definition of the word "spin"?

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » November 20, 2003, 7:19 pm

yeah that clears it right up for me, thanks!

also, you're not a fucking moron.

Post by **Xouqoa** » November 20, 2003, 7:23 pm

Sylvus wrote:
Pahreyia wrote:And you're obviously so loved for it.
Like it or not, she is. Just because there are like 8-10 posters who get a hard-on attacking her doesn't mean that her contribution isn't valued by the rest of us.

hay i got 5 votes1!!

edit: LOL

Pahreyia · Post by **Pahreyia** » November 20, 2003, 7:25 pm

Sylvus wrote:Which part of that sentence asked for a definition of the word "spin"?

What other part of that sentence would require clarification or definition?

Skogen · Post by **Skogen** » November 20, 2003, 7:44 pm

Sylvus wrote:
Pahreyia wrote:And you're obviously so loved for it.
Like it or not, she is. Just because there are like 8-10 posters who get a hard-on attacking her doesn't mean that her contribution isn't valued by the rest of us.

Atokal isn't on the list wtf?

Atokal · Post by **Atokal** » November 20, 2003, 8:02 pm

Im on the list I got 8 votes

Cheers

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » November 20, 2003, 8:03 pm

The funny thing is... You talk about the "majority" opinion an awful lot when speaking about the US, specifically GWBush. And once the "majority" starts to critique you for your lack of insightful posts lately, you pull the great Canadian spin and attack the people, not the topic

Eh not to defend Kyou but I hardly think the majority of VV readers is what she would be talking about.. A majority of VV readers don't necesarily hold the same view as a majority of the US population or world population or whatever.

Aslanna · Post by **Aslanna** » November 20, 2003, 8:21 pm

Cartalas wrote:Pahreyia Did your just not smart enought to understand.

Huh?

Skogen · Post by **Skogen** » November 20, 2003, 8:27 pm

Atokal wrote:Im on the list I got 8 votes

Cheers

Ah there you are, down towards the bottom. My bad.

Pahreyia · Post by **Pahreyia** » November 20, 2003, 8:38 pm

Kelshara wrote:
The funny thing is... You talk about the "majority" opinion an awful lot when speaking about the US, specifically GWBush. And once the "majority" starts to critique you for your lack of insightful posts lately, you pull the great Canadian spin and attack the people, not the topic
Eh not to defend Kyou but I hardly think the majority of VV readers is what she would be talking about.. A majority of VV readers don't necesarily hold the same view as a majority of the US population or world population or whatever.

True, the representation of this board is skewed. However, from the standpoint of this community, a good portion of active posters are critiquing her posts as of late. Opinions being what they are, I'm not the only one who's less than excited to see her tired one-liner reposnses 3 out of every 4 posts. If she wants to hold to the fact that she's loved and wanted and needed and whatever based on a poll that 7 months old from a point which her contributions were actually pertainant, then she could stand to post something of substance from time to time.

Dregor Thule · Post by **Dregor Thule** » November 20, 2003, 9:07 pm

Teh majority hath spaketh!

Rivera Bladestrike · November 21, 2003, 12:39 am

Krimson Klaw wrote:I had Riv on ignore for being stupid with me a few months ago. As far as kyoukan is concerned, if she did not post here, then I never would have started. She keeps a few of us around believe it or not whether we agree or disagree on topics.

I don't recall being "stupid with you" before, but whatever, the fact is I agreed with you in this topic. As for Kyoukan, fuck her, all she does is get everyone angry, granted some of it is absolutely necessary for the rednecks that post here some of the time, but the extremism is off the fucking charts.

Pahreyia · Post by **Pahreyia** » November 21, 2003, 5:43 am

Dregor Thule wrote:Teh majority hath spaketh!

Wasn't that right in the midst of when she threw her "everyone hates me" fit and quit posting for a few weeks?

Just asking for clarification.

Keverian FireCry · Post by **Keverian FireCry** » November 21, 2003, 6:03 am

All kyo had said is that they airbruch the crap out of their magazines. And that is true, they airbrush women models all the time these days including in Playboy magazine. How the fuck did that deserve to be jumped on by Krimson and Pahryia in the first place? YOU started the flaming on this thread and you call her a troll? Talk about fucking trolls you hypocritical peices of shit.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » November 21, 2003, 9:52 am

Deward wrote:Sorry to get back to the original topic but does everyone remember the disappointment of Cindy Crawford in Playboy? They made this huge deal of her being in it and she ended up showing almost no skin. Just some see through one pieces. I could see the same shit happening here. Britney would probably do that for a million bucks. She's been nearly naked already and seems to be following the Madonna trail to super stardom.

Where do you find the PG-13 version of Playboy? I own the Cindy Crawfor one and she is completely naked, showing bush and all with nary a stitch on her. You may be confused and be thinking of Vanna White. She did not pose for Playboy though, her photos were taken by a lingerie photog years before she got "famous".

I have changed my mind about the monkey. I think I would rather see Brittney and Christina sharing a double header....ass to ass.

Krimson Klaw · Post by **Krimson Klaw** » November 21, 2003, 10:54 am

Keverian FireCry wrote:All kyo had said is that they airbruch the crap out of their magazines. And that is true, they airbrush women models all the time these days including in Playboy magazine. How the fuck did that deserve to be jumped on by Krimson and Pahryia in the first place? YOU started the flaming on this thread and you call her a troll? Talk about fucking trolls you hypocritical peices of shit.

I was joking when I jumped on her for stating an opinion here because she did the same to me in another thread. Keep up slappy. Funny how you run to her defence when I do it to her, but I hear crickets when she did it to me. Just clarification.

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » November 21, 2003, 11:00 am

Krimson Klaw wrote:
Keverian FireCry wrote:All kyo had said is that they airbruch the crap out of their magazines. And that is true, they airbrush women models all the time these days including in Playboy magazine. How the fuck did that deserve to be jumped on by Krimson and Pahryia in the first place? YOU started the flaming on this thread and you call her a troll? Talk about fucking trolls you hypocritical peices of shit.
I was joking when I jumped on her for stating an opinion here because she did the same to me in another thread. Keep up slappy. Funny how you run to her defence when I do it to her, but I hear crickets when she did it to me. Just clarification.

Cause you dont have a Vagina

masteen · Post by **masteen** » November 21, 2003, 11:53 am

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:
Deward wrote:Sorry to get back to the original topic but does everyone remember the disappointment of Cindy Crawford in Playboy? They made this huge deal of her being in it and she ended up showing almost no skin. Just some see through one pieces. I could see the same shit happening here. Britney would probably do that for a million bucks. She's been nearly naked already and seems to be following the Madonna trail to super stardom.
Where do you find the PG-13 version of Playboy? I own the Cindy Crawfor one and she is completely naked, showing bush and all with nary a stitch on her. You may be confused and be thinking of Vanna White. She did not pose for Playboy though, her photos were taken by a lingerie photog years before she got "famous".

I have changed my mind about the monkey. I think I would rather see Brittney and Christina sharing a double header....ass to ass.

Didn't Cindy pose for them twice? Once was just some see thru stuff, and the second was the full monty.

Deward · Post by **Deward** » November 21, 2003, 12:05 pm

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:Where do you find the PG-13 version of Playboy? I own the Cindy Crawfor one and she is completely naked, showing bush and all with nary a stitch on her. You may be confused and be thinking of Vanna White. She did not pose for Playboy though, her photos were taken by a lingerie photog years before she got "famous".

I have changed my mind about the monkey. I think I would rather see Brittney and Christina sharing a double header....ass to ass.

Absolutely right, it was Vanna now that I remember. It was a long time ago and I just remember them making such a big deal out fo nothing.

Krimson Klaw · Post by **Krimson Klaw** » November 21, 2003, 12:11 pm

Vanna White? Who would want to see her bony tail naked?

Skogen · Post by **Skogen** » November 21, 2003, 12:33 pm

Bo Derek is the one that stands out in my mind of highly anticipated PB spreads that failed to deliever. Anyone remember that one? it was in the early eighties, and I was like 13 or something. One of the neighborhood kid's dad had the issue, and a bunch of us went over there after school to see it when his parents were still at work. I saw it, and although she was indeed totally naked, there was only like 3 pages.

Spicoli: "Seen the new Playboy?"
Jefferson's little brother: "Bo Derek's tits!"
Spicoli: "I like sex."

Mukyluk · Post by **Mukyluk** » November 21, 2003, 12:40 pm

Skogen wrote:Bo Derek is the one that stands out in my mind of highly anticipated PB spreads that failed to deliever. Anyone remember that one? it was in the early eighties, and I was like 13 or something. One of the neighborhood kid's dad had the issue, and a bunch of us went over there after school to see it when his parents were still at work. I saw it, and although she was indeed totally naked, there was only like 3 pages.

Spicoli: "Seen the new Playboy?"
Jefferson's little brother: "Bo Derek's tits!"
Spicoli: "I like sex."

and there circle jerk insuded...

Skogen · Post by **Skogen** » November 21, 2003, 12:45 pm

Mukyluk wrote:
Skogen wrote:Bo Derek is the one that stands out in my mind of highly anticipated PB spreads that failed to deliever. Anyone remember that one? it was in the early eighties, and I was like 13 or something. One of the neighborhood kid's dad had the issue, and a bunch of us went over there after school to see it when his parents were still at work. I saw it, and although she was indeed totally naked, there was only like 3 pages.

Spicoli: "Seen the new Playboy?"
Jefferson's little brother: "Bo Derek's tits!"
Spicoli: "I like sex."
and there circle jerk insuded...

A game of "cookie", anyone?

Wulfran · Post by **Wulfran** » November 21, 2003, 1:55 pm

Kyou, stop lying: Pahreyia IS a fucking moron!!!

Back to the original thing...

I remember this chick named Madonna back in 87 or 88 ended up with some nude pics in Penthouse or Playboy (against her will according to popular mytholgy at the time)... it doesn't seem to me like it ever hurt her career, rather it generated a lot of interest from the teenage male population for that issue of the magazine, and generated a lot of media focus. Did it hurt her? I think not. Did it help change her image from a bubblegum queen into a more adult pop star? Who can say for sure but she did make the transition. I'm not a fan of Madonna's look or music but she's got a business/strategic mind that any Fortune 500 CEO could envy. If Brittney is taking a page out of Madonna's book then it may work for her... but she just doesn't seem cagey enough to me...

Pahreyia · Post by **Pahreyia** » November 21, 2003, 2:13 pm

Wulfran wrote:Kyou, stop lying: Pahreyia IS a fucking moron!!!

You so win at flames. omgad jabl0wned!11!

Atokal · Post by **Atokal** » November 21, 2003, 2:29 pm

Wulfran wrote: blank

funny that is what I see when you post.

Best issue I can remember that didnt let down what the Katerina Witt issue.

yummmm

Skogen · Post by **Skogen** » November 21, 2003, 2:33 pm

Atokal wrote: Best issue I can remember that didnt let down what the Katerina Witt issue.

yummmm

Yeah on that!! That one gave me rub-one-out material for a long, long time!!

wait, was that out loud?

Krimson Klaw · Post by **Krimson Klaw** » November 21, 2003, 2:52 pm

Rivera Bladestrike wrote:
Krimson Klaw wrote:I had Riv on ignore for being stupid with me a few months ago. As far as kyoukan is concerned, if she did not post here, then I never would have started. She keeps a few of us around believe it or not whether we agree or disagree on topics.
I don't recall being "stupid with you" before, but whatever, the fact is I agreed with you in this topic. As for Kyoukan, fuck her, all she does is get everyone angry, granted some of it is absolutely necessary for the rednecks that post here some of the time, but the extremism is off the fucking charts.

I looked back through your posts and saw where we argued. It's silly, but don't know why I felt a need to put you on ignore to begin with, you are off. Now send me money via pay pal for being so generous

Keverian FireCry · Post by **Keverian FireCry** » November 21, 2003, 3:53 pm

I was joking when I jumped on her for stating an opinion here because she did the same to me in another thread.

You were joking? Right, go ahead and bullshit your way out of this one. You're such a fucking liar.

Funny how you run to her defence when I do it to her, but I hear crickets when she did it to me. Just clarification.

Maybe this is because I don't fucking like you, you ignorant asshole.

noel · Post by **noel** » November 21, 2003, 4:03 pm

I think we need another 'most hated' post. Would be fun to see who the winner is now.