FTC to appeal do-not-call decision

What do you think about the world?
Post Reply
User avatar
Aabidano
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4861
Joined: July 19, 2002, 2:23 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Florida

FTC to appeal do-not-call decision

Post by Aabidano »

Unless federal officials can convince the courts that the list does not violate free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment, the list will not be implemented as expected.
Since when is advertising protected free speech? Didn't Nike just lose a case based on this idea 3-4 months ago?

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/09/ ... index.html
"Life is what happens while you're making plans for later."
User avatar
Chidoro
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 3428
Joined: July 3, 2002, 6:45 pm

Post by Chidoro »

Seriously, how hard is it to just hang up on them? I find the blood donating facility to be ten times more intrusive then any telemarketing call. I mean, you give once and they contiually hound you every 6 months until you donate again. And that type of activity isn't even covered under this bill.
User avatar
Kilmoll the Sexy
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 5295
Joined: July 3, 2002, 3:31 pm
Gender: Male
XBL Gamertag: bunkeru2k
Location: Ohio

Post by Kilmoll the Sexy »

Yes, but you can have them remove you from their call list and if they continue calling you can file telephone harrassment charges against them. No one has the right to make repeated unwanted calls.
Neroon
Gets Around
Gets Around
Posts: 213
Joined: July 16, 2002, 3:35 pm

Post by Neroon »

If the government suddendly made telemarketing illegal. Then perhaps these pricks would have a case. However, it is a *voluntary* list. People, by putting themselves on the list, are saying they do not want to be solicited.

Last time I checked, you had a right to refuse unwanted solicitation.
User avatar
kyoukan
Super Poster!
Super Poster!
Posts: 8548
Joined: July 5, 2002, 3:33 am
Location: Vancouver

Re: FTC to appeal do-not-call decision

Post by kyoukan »

Aabidano wrote:[Since when is advertising protected free speech? Didn't Nike just lose a case based on this idea 3-4 months ago?
No the Nike suit was brought about because they said that they stopped using 3rd world sweatshop labor when really they absolutly did not stop using it. In fact they even opened up more factories in 3rd world countries where they could hire as many slaves as they could. When watchdog groups took them to court over it, Nike representatives claimed that they were excercising their first amendment right when they lied. Yes Nike executives really are that out of touch with the world.
User avatar
Aabidano
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 4861
Joined: July 19, 2002, 2:23 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Florida

Re: FTC to appeal do-not-call decision

Post by Aabidano »

kyoukan wrote:Nike representatives claimed that they were excercising their first amendment right when they lied.
I was fairly sure that 'advertising is free speech' argument is what caused them to lose the suit. Of course they really didn't have anything else to fall back on. Speech made for soley and specifically for commercial gain doesn't fall under the first amendment.
"Life is what happens while you're making plans for later."
User avatar
Vetiria
Way too much time!
Way too much time!
Posts: 1226
Joined: July 3, 2002, 4:50 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Decatur, IL

Post by Vetiria »

Federal Appeals Court allowing the Do Not Call list to go forward.

http://money.cnn.com/2003/10/07/news/co ... /index.htm
Post Reply