Top part of the Effiel Tower is on fire!

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » July 22, 2003, 2:40 pm

http://www.cnn.com/

Also Sadam's Sons reported dead!

"Fire reported at Eiffel Tower in Paris
PARIS (AP) — One of the top floors of the Eiffel Tower was on fire Tuesday, officials said. Smoke could be seen rising from the famous Paris monument.
Officials said they were not sure whether anyone was on the top level, where the fire appeared to have erupted
"

Skogen · Post by **Skogen** » July 22, 2003, 2:44 pm

nuthin there about the Eifel tower

Sirensa · Post by **Sirensa** » July 22, 2003, 3:02 pm

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/07 ... index.html

It was in the red breaking news section but seems to have moved.

Kelgar · Post by **Kelgar** » July 22, 2003, 3:02 pm

Sons dead? Damn you just eat that shit up like it's nothing don't you? Reading comprehension is your friend, no matter how much you'd like to insist otherwise.

Does the word "likely" mean anything to you? Also "burned beyond recognition" should immediately raise a warning flag for "another likely bullshit story" for those of us with half a brain.

From a strategic standpoint, why the fuck would both of his sons be in the same place? Having all the eggs in one basket (sans Saddam) just seems way too damn convenient.

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » July 22, 2003, 3:09 pm

Kelgar wrote:Sons dead? Damn you just eat that shit up like it's nothing don't you? Reading comprehension is your friend, no matter how much you'd like to insist otherwise.

Does the word "likely" mean anything to you? Also "burned beyond recognition" should immediately raise a warning flag for "another likely bullshit story" for those of us with half a brain.

From a strategic standpoint, why the fuck would both of his sons be in the same place? Having all the eggs in one basket (sans Saddam) just seems way too damn convenient.

WOW!!! you really are that ignorant arent you, Take a look at my original post Dunder head....Go ahead ill give you a few minutes to take a look.......

Did I say I believe it?
Did I post " HEY LOOK SADDAM"S SONS ARE DEAD"?

No you Dumb and Dumber reject I said "Also Sadam's Sons reported dead!"
Key Word here REPORTED!!!!

Now get outside and finish that skirting around your trailer im sure the neighbors are complaning.

Voronwë · Post by **Voronwë** » July 22, 2003, 3:10 pm

it does bring up an interesting question as to how you verify to the public that the bodies are really the 2 sons.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » July 22, 2003, 3:12 pm

DNA tests.

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » July 22, 2003, 3:17 pm

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:DNA tests.

You know as well as I that the Liberals will say the DNA was tampered with.

Voronwë · Post by **Voronwë** » July 22, 2003, 3:27 pm

no shit, DNA testing? tell me more of this DNA...

well obtuse as his "analysis" may be, Cartalas clarified my question Kilmoll.

The "liberals" are irrelevant in this scenario though Cart, the people you have to convince are the Iraqis.

And my question is does the US let somebody independently verify the DNA sample testing.

I just think it is an interesting question for the military/government to consider as to what level of assurance they feel is necessary to give the Iraqi populace.

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » July 22, 2003, 3:34 pm

"And my question is does the US let somebody independently verify the DNA sample testing."

They should

masteen · Post by **masteen** » July 22, 2003, 4:17 pm

Est il mal que la première chose I a pensé à sur la lecture que la tour d'Eiffel était sur le feu était cette chanson "Disco Inferno?" Brûlure, bébé, brûlure!

Post by **Sylvus** » July 22, 2003, 4:51 pm

Okay, now they are saying that Saddam's sons are confirmed dead.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/07/ ... index.html

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » July 22, 2003, 4:55 pm

Be right back im going to get a back-hoe to dig Kelger's head out of the sand.

Atokal · Post by **Atokal** » July 22, 2003, 5:49 pm

Kelgar wrote: Does the word "likely" mean anything to you? Also "burned beyond recognition" should immediately raise a warning flag for "another likely bullshit story" for those of us with half a brain.

Yep always figured you for half a brain

Forthe · Post by **Forthe** » July 22, 2003, 7:18 pm

What is the significance of these two being killed?

Akaran_D · Post by **Akaran_D** » July 22, 2003, 8:57 pm

A big one.
These are a pair of sick, twisted mother fuckers that I can't even begin to describe. Both of them were confirmed multiple rapists, torture specalists, warmongers, and one of the two was to be sadam's sucessor. I think one of them also was set as the head of the ministry of information or communiction, I beleive.

They're been on the top 3 list for the US's hunt and kill orders since the war started. Some of our more in depth posters can get information together on the sheer number of the things these two have been reported to have done.

Zamtuk · Post by **Zamtuk** » July 22, 2003, 11:25 pm

They identified the Qasay from all the bullet wounds he had from a failed assassination attempt from years ago. Ironically, or maybe not, the assassination was set up by his own father.

Legenae · Post by **Legenae** » July 23, 2003, 11:47 am

Thought it was Uday who had the assassinaiton attempt on him.

*edit* spelling

Krimson Klaw · Post by **Krimson Klaw** » July 23, 2003, 12:26 pm

Forthe wrote:What is the significance of these two being killed?

Yea was Uday. The significance of these deaths is Qusay was commander of the Republican guard and head of the secret police. Uday I think ran the propoganda network and Olympics for his country, pretty much viewed as being too unstable by Saddam to do much of anything else but torture people.

Qusay was the real bag here, Uday was just basically a serial rapist/murderer.

Skogen · Post by **Skogen** » July 23, 2003, 12:36 pm

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Re ... sp?ID=8060

sick, twisted fuckers.

Post by **Sylvus** » July 23, 2003, 12:38 pm

Now that his sons are gone, we just need to bag dad. Get it, Baghdad? Har har!

Sorry...

Skogen · Post by **Skogen** » July 23, 2003, 12:57 pm

Sylvus wrote:Now that his sons are gone, we just need to bag dad. Get it, Baghdad? Har har!

Sorry...

EXCELLENT!

Kelgar · Post by **Kelgar** » August 1, 2003, 7:21 am

Holy old fucking threads, Batman!

http://reese.king-online.com/Reese_20030801/index.php

FYI, I know that a few will expect this to be yet another "piece of liberal slanted" shit, but those of you who arent fucking tards will recognize the fact that Charley Reese is typically considered a moderate conservative.

Kelgar · Post by **Kelgar** » August 1, 2003, 7:38 am

http://reese.king-online.com/Reese_20020617/index.php

Word has come that some folks have begun to question my conservative credentials. That's easy to understand. There are quite a few blockheads in America today who falsely wear the label "conservative."

Some blockheads equate being a conservative with ardent support of any war, no matter how unconstitutional, unnecessary and unjust the war might be. A true conservative supports the Constitution and does not support anybody or anything that violates it. Some people have said there is a resemblance between America today and the Weimar Republic, which eventually produced Adolf Hitler. I think there is some truth to that comparison. There are an awful lot of heel-clickers who swoon with admiration for any politician willing to bomb some foreigners. These same people are more than willing to trade liberty (which they make little use of anyway) for security. That is not conservatism.

A wonderful Southern scholar, Dr. Clyde Wilson, has defined the difference between patriotism and nationalism. A patriot, he says, loves his land and his people; a nationalist loves his government. A conservative wishes to preserve the prosperity and health of both the land and the people, not squander them in unnecessary wars.

Definately an interesting definition he has for a conservative. If that were how most "conservatives" genuinley are, then I wouldn't be at all ashamed to willingly adopt that label as well.