We need more government!!!!

[Midnyte_Ragebringer]

Aside from a one spot that I would have probably punctuated differently, and one place where I would break it into two paragraphs (both the results of lazy / sloppy edits, btw), I'd be interested to know what horrible grammatical gaffes I've committed. Go ahead, Funk. It will be entertaining to be schooled by an imbecile that believes this is a properly formed, complete sentence:

And if you think that having the democrats run both houses and the president, it's not even worth talking to you about something as simple as the color of the sky.

Where did I say I was perfect? I'm not the one claiming to know how everything is supposed to be like you, you arrogant fucking toolbag. It's common courtesy to break big paragraphs up so people don't have to read one big sloppy douched up sentence.

Your mistake was bringing that up at all. That isn't important to the topic at hand. It's a typical attack they would do upon you to detract from discussing the issues. You stooped to their level. Unnecessary.

[Xatrei]

Aside from a one spot that I would have probably punctuated differently, and one place where I would break it into two paragraphs (both the results of lazy / sloppy edits, btw), I'd be interested to know what horrible grammatical gaffes I've committed. Go ahead, Funk. It will be entertaining to be schooled by an imbecile that believes this is a properly formed, complete sentence:

And if you think that having the democrats run both houses and the president, it's not even worth talking to you about something as simple as the color of the sky.

Where did I say I was perfect? I'm not the one claiming to know how everything is supposed to be like you, you arrogant fucking toolbag. It's common courtesy to break big paragraphs up so people don't have to read one big sloppy douched up sentence.

If you're going to criticize someone for their use of the language, you'd damned well better be able to back it up with some superior fucking zen master grammar skills of your own. As I said, there should be a paragraph break in the previous post, but I accidentally merged them while editing my post before submitting it. Ooooh the humanity! If it makes you feel better, imagine there's a couple of <br />'s between "priorities." and "I agree" in that post. Otherwise, there's no giant issue with it. Even without the paragraph break, you'll note that it's not "one big sloppy douched up sentence" [sic]. There are several properly punctuated (for the most part) sentences.

Now seriously, if this is all you can argue about, just shut the fuck up.

[Funkmasterr]

Aside from a one spot that I would have probably punctuated differently, and one place where I would break it into two paragraphs (both the results of lazy / sloppy edits, btw), I'd be interested to know what horrible grammatical gaffes I've committed. Go ahead, Funk. It will be entertaining to be schooled by an imbecile that believes this is a properly formed, complete sentence:

And if you think that having the democrats run both houses and the president, it's not even worth talking to you about something as simple as the color of the sky.

Where did I say I was perfect? I'm not the one claiming to know how everything is supposed to be like you, you arrogant fucking toolbag. It's common courtesy to break big paragraphs up so people don't have to read one big sloppy douched up sentence.

Your mistake was bringing that up at all. That isn't important to the topic at hand. It's a typical attack they would do upon you to detract from discussing the issues. You stooped to their level. Unnecessary.

Not really, the topic at hand isn't even worth my time when someone is being arrogant like him and stating his view like it is obviously the only right way and everyone else is an idiot.

This is the same reason I generally don't try and engage nick. If he actually wanted to truly spark a debate on the topic he would state his view and ask for a rebuttle, not be an arrogant obnoxious prick about it. That's actually a big problem here period, but it's just easier to say I'm wrecking the forum.

I'm tired of typing now, I think I'll go back to one liners.

[Al]

Where did I say I was perfect? I'm not the one claiming to know how everything is supposed to be, like you, you arrogant fucking toolbag. It's common courtesy to break big paragraphs up, so people don't have to read one big, sloppy, douched up sentence.

I think I fixed it for you, although there may be an extra comma, it's been over a decade since high school...


On a side note:

Because they are dumb. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why they fall for it again and again.

I indulge because I can. If the offending post is thought inspiring, depending on my mood, I may post a rejoinder. I do not consider it a flaw, and I also do not consider myself "dumb". I do, however, question the intellect of those who would cast disparagements at people for posting on the internet, regardless of the topic or forum. You have replied to the same troll that you are outing, just as I have replied to the troll you have crafted.

[Winnow]

Never seen two people with bulletpoof vests hug before!

[Nick]

Oh god now they're defending the Iraq war.

All hope is lost.

[Al]

Oh god now they're defending the Iraq war.

All hope is lost.

Who is? I certainly wasn't. Saying that it is social engineering is calling it what it is. The Inquisition was also social engineering, as was the holocaust. The term leaves a LOT of room for interpretation.