oops? (london suspect shooting)

masteen · Post by **masteen** » August 19, 2005, 7:13 pm

No, but he certainly looks foreign. In the UK, foreign means Indian/Paki or Chinese, because they allowed people from their former colonies to become English citizens.

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » August 19, 2005, 7:42 pm

That guy does not look particularly foreign in Europe.

miir · Post by **miir** » August 19, 2005, 7:58 pm

masteen wrote:No, but he certainly looks foreign. In the UK, foreign means Indian/Paki or Chinese, because they allowed people from their former colonies to become English citizens.

Well, he didn't say 'foreign', he said 'pakistani'.
That's like you getting a mexican confused with a chinese person.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » August 19, 2005, 9:22 pm

His picture looks like trouble to me. Slap a blue turban on his head and he's a dead ringer for the 3rd Antichrist.

Nick · Post by **Nick** » August 20, 2005, 3:45 pm

Thanks Miir, I didn't have time to go dig those pictures up before I went out on the lash last night.

Firstly, he doesn't look foreign in the slightest, secondly, he isn't fat, thirdly, he isn't wearing a heavy coat.

Fourthly, if you look at all the eyewitness reports on the BBC site as opposed to just one (I don't know if they still have these up, I am going on what I remember from the time it happened) it's pretty fucking apparant that he wasn't holding a gun, carrying bombs, vaulting ticket booths or wearing a heavy coat.

The very fact the Police tried to hault an independant enquiry of this murder should be enough to make even the most stubborn of you smell a rat here.

Lastly, the police here are apologising out of their ass on an almost daily basis here now for what is generally accepted (even by them) to be a massive cock up which not only was a massive mistake in the first place, but also (and now mainly) because of the false police press releases and further false information (heavy coat/gun/vaulting of ticket booth) they themselves allowed to be propogated.

Accept you are wrong on this one and get over it.

Even the people you are defending don't agree with you anymore.

masteen · Post by **masteen** » August 23, 2005, 4:20 pm

I love how yall (liberal meatbags) started decrying the "open season on darkies" and are now saying he doesn't look the least bit foreign.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » August 23, 2005, 4:37 pm

masteen wrote:I love how yall (liberal meatbags) started decrying the "open season on darkies" and are now saying he doesn't look the least bit foreign.

Flip Flop Flip Flop!

miir · Post by **miir** » August 23, 2005, 6:05 pm

masteen wrote:I love how yall (liberal meatbags) started decrying the "open season on darkies" and are now saying he doesn't look the least bit foreign.

He's hispanic, not pakistani.
Last time I checked, the UK is not a hispanic country.
Therefore a hispanic individual in the UK would look foreign.

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » August 23, 2005, 8:05 pm

masteen wrote:I love how yall (liberal meatbags) started decrying the "open season on darkies" and are now saying he doesn't look the least bit foreign.

I love how idiots who have no clue of what they are talking about run their mouths non-stop. The mixture of people in Europe is at LEAST as large as here in the US. If not more (probably more in fact). You can see so many different "nationalities" that you don't consider them foreign. Doesn't change the fact that racial profiling is idiotic (as proven here).

Wiever · Post by **Wiever** » August 24, 2005, 4:59 am

Kelshara wrote:
masteen wrote:I love how yall (liberal meatbags) started decrying the "open season on darkies" and are now saying he doesn't look the least bit foreign.
I love how idiots who have no clue of what they are talking about run their mouths non-stop. The mixture of people in Europe is at LEAST as large as here in the US. If not more (probably more in fact). You can see so many different "nationalities" that you don't consider them foreign. Doesn't change the fact that racial profiling is idiotic (as proven here).

Your statement added as much as this one did to this aguement, grats on being redundent, wait, or was that retarded?

Nick · Post by **Nick** » August 24, 2005, 8:35 am

We were all going on the newspaper and tv reports that at the time clearly stated he was of !coloured! skin.

Throughout Britain (not just with "liberal meatbags - you retard) the worrying assumption that racial profiling with a fairly loose shoot to kill policy may become more common (and as such was a dangerous thing) was a reasonable assumption/worry to consider at the time, one which most of London and the UK tended to agree with.

As new information has come to light, your dying argument pretty much had it's final nail hammered into it's supersized coffin - nice work gracefully bowing out with all the eloquence of Midnyte fucking Ragebringer.

Since then (from my angle here), of course, there have been pictures released of the chap. Anyone can see he doesn't look particularly foreign.
I am still worried that the police will feel so trigger happy on the tube - I have many friends in London and I do worry about them

In this case, the police just went batshit insane on a 'whitey', not a 'darkie'. Therefore, regarding the "racial profiling" it is an absolute necessity to refine ones perception of this incident, once new information has come to light..

Ever heard of this concept you pissant?

Evidently not.