Lynks wrote:He didn't get a suspension because he missed. Thats Campbell's excuse. I think he should have received 1 for "intent to injure".
Look at the replays for Pronger again. He was aiming for the head and he wanted to take him out with his elbow. His threw a punch with his elbow.
Niel took a run at Mcdonald and his elbow hit squarely on his head. It even shows it in slow-mo. You can see his neck snapping to the side from the impact.
He threw a flying elbow.
In hockey:
If you jump to make a hit, it's a penalty.
If you lead with your elbow (and not your shoulder), it's a penalty.
If you take a 20+ foot run at a player to check him at the boards, it's a penalty.
If you do all 3, it should be a suspension.
Compare that to Mcammond running his head into Prongers elbow. Pronger was coasting slowly backwards and made a slight shift to his left and put his elbow up. Mcammond was admiring his shot and looked up at the last second to see Pronger's elbow.
I have no bias here.
I'm a bigger fan of the Sens than the Ducks.
If I was a Ducks fan, I'd be saying it's Mcammond's fault for taking a run at Pronger's elbow. He should have gotten a penalty on the play... a penalty for being
stupid. One of the first things you learn in hockey is to keep your head up.
It was an open ice hit.
Pronger was virtually standing still.
The only infraction he's guilty of is getting his elbow up.
If you've been watching this series at all, there have been dozens of plays (by both teams) that could be considered far worse.