PIRATES

Truant · Post by **Truant** » March 21, 2007, 5:11 pm

Since it hasn't been posted yet...here is the link to the trailer for At World's End.

http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/pirates ... dsend.html

Lynks · Post by **Lynks** » March 21, 2007, 5:51 pm

I loved the first one because it wasn't over the top. This one looks like too much is happening. I'll go see it but I don't think I'll like it.

Funkmasterr · Post by **Funkmasterr** » March 21, 2007, 6:00 pm

I liked both of the movies so far, and am looking forward to this one, it looks very cool judging by the trailer.

Kwonryu DragonFist · Post by **Kwonryu DragonFist** » March 21, 2007, 6:52 pm

I liked part 1 thanks to the Guybrush LeChuck Monkey Island similarities and part 2 thanks to Kraken and the fishfellas.

Not sure how part 3 can top that tho

Aslanna · Post by **Aslanna** » March 21, 2007, 7:37 pm

Hope it's better than #2 which I thought was pretty weak.

I heard Keith Richards will be in it somewhere!

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » March 21, 2007, 7:55 pm

Didn't like the second one. First one was very entertaining. Bigger isn't always better. The original was more focused. The wheel that rolled around forever on the island in Part II sums up the absurdity of the second movie..a little too "Three Stooges" for me.

Truant · Post by **Truant** » March 22, 2007, 12:03 am

All you naysayers can suck me. Savvy?

Aslanna · Post by **Aslanna** » March 22, 2007, 2:46 am

Fact is #2 was two and a half hours of rubbish. I wouldn't call that naysaying!

rhyae · Post by **rhyae** » March 22, 2007, 9:10 am

Fact is #2 was two and a half hours of rubbish. I wouldn't call that naysaying!

Fact is #2 was two and a half hours of prequel for #3.

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » March 22, 2007, 9:20 am

Psyloche · Post by **Psyloche** » March 22, 2007, 9:42 am

yeah but it had jack sparrow in it

Aslanna · Post by **Aslanna** » March 22, 2007, 10:02 am

I know what it was. What I don't know is what your point is.

Unless you're saying it was ok it sucked because it was a 'prequel' to another movie. Which would be a ridiculous line of thought so I'm sure that's not it.

noel · Post by **noel** » March 22, 2007, 12:53 pm

Aslanna and I have something in common.

I'm always surprised when that happens.

rhyae · Post by **rhyae** » March 22, 2007, 6:32 pm

Let me splain what I meant:
It was 2.5 hours of filler, like an introduction to another movie, not really its own movie.
But it was enough to get our $10.50. We like the franchise and the characters so we happily pay.
And now we get to do it all over again with #3.
I still bought it on DVD

Truant · Post by **Truant** » March 23, 2007, 5:21 pm

noel wrote:Aslanna and I have something in common.

I'm always surprised when that happens.

That's two things then, to be technical.

Lalanae · Post by **Lalanae** » March 23, 2007, 6:38 pm

Poor Noel. Everyone's always editing his comments