Stealth

[Fash]

This is a fine example of a good movie with a horrible trailer. I enjoyed the flick quite a bit, and wish I had seen it in a theater for the full effect.

[hide]
from the trailer all you can expect is a 2 hour movie about securing a rogue plane.... but the plane quickly turns into an ally for the second plot of the movie, the rescue & closure & love story finish.
[/hide]

goodbye

[kyoukan]

is the plane really advanced? I mean how many canadian soliders could it accidentally kill in one payload?

[Sionistic]

As many as you could round up. So im guessing 2200.

[kyoukan]

I could only round up maybe four. I don't know that many.

How many MODO's (millions of disobeyed orders) per second can the processor calculate?

[Hesten]

The movie have GOT to be better than the trailer, or we got a new entry at IMDBs bottom 100 .
Not kidding, 5 of my friends have seen this trailer, without talking to each other, and everyone complained about how horrible this movie looks.
Was bad enough with the first part, the "i wanna be a Top Gun clone", but when they added the rogue computer plane thingy, we reached a new low in trailers.

[Sionistic]

I was thinking if you went for a major city.

And about 10 Petaflops

[Aslanna]

This is a bad movie. Don't go see this movie.

Ebert explains:

'Stealth" is an offense against taste, intelligence and the noise pollution code -- a dumbed-down "Top Gun" crossed with the HAL 9000 plot from "2001." It might be of interest to you if you want to see lots of jet airplanes going real fast and making a lot of noise, and if you don't care that the story doesn't merely defy logic, but strips logic bare, cremates it and scatters its ashes. Here is a movie with the nerve to discuss a computer brain "like a quantum sponge" while violating Newton's Laws of Motion.

However I'll give it a 50 over 100 just because I'm feeling generous.



(Oh.. And the trailer is much better because you only waste 2 minutes of your life rather than 2 hours)