I'm not holding my breath, but I hope this is true.

Adex_Xeda · Post by **Adex_Xeda** » January 23, 2004, 4:57 pm

Al Qaeda down by 70%

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribun ... ing_4.html

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » January 23, 2004, 5:10 pm

finally terrorism is almost defeated.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » January 23, 2004, 5:20 pm

Al Qaeda has an exact number that allows us to say it's 70% gone? Sketchy info at best! A new group called Al Qaedi has been gaining members at the same pace Al Qaeda has been losing them mysteriously.

Brotha · Post by **Brotha** » January 23, 2004, 5:27 pm

We're smoken em' all out

Arborealus · Post by **Arborealus** » January 23, 2004, 6:37 pm

I heard Yantis bought 'em out...

masteen · Post by **masteen** » January 23, 2004, 7:05 pm

We're taking the fight to Mars!!!

Dregor Thule · Post by **Dregor Thule** » January 23, 2004, 7:12 pm

Adex_Xeda · Post by **Adex_Xeda** » January 23, 2004, 7:27 pm

Skogen · Post by **Skogen** » January 23, 2004, 7:30 pm

All are now part of my CHUD army. The day of reconing is coming.

Sionistic · Post by **Sionistic** » January 23, 2004, 10:31 pm

I really doubt there is a way an accurate to measure this

Lohrno · Post by **Lohrno** » January 23, 2004, 10:52 pm

kyoukan wrote:finally terrorism is almost defeated.

If the intelligence is correct. And not terrorism, but Al Qaida. I don't think that they necessarily have a monopoly on it...

-=Lohrno

Sionistic · Post by **Sionistic** » January 23, 2004, 10:54 pm

it was sarcasm, and why dont you just make

-=Lohrno

your signature?

Lohrno · Post by **Lohrno** » January 23, 2004, 11:01 pm

Sionistic wrote:it was sarcasm

Oh...I apologize, sometimes I'm pretty dense.

and why dont you just make

-=Lohrno

your signature?[/quote]

Too lazy.

-=Lohrno

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » January 24, 2004, 12:02 am

Brotha wrote:We're smoken em' all out

The worse part is that you probably believe that.

I find it interesting that this was released now shortly after the comments by conflict experts gathered in Davos, including the leader of the respected organization named International Crisis Group, Gareth Evans (former foreign minister of Australia). They back this up with how al-Qaida has managed to get a foothold in Saudi-Arabia, Marokko, Indonesia and Tunis.

Adex_Xeda · Post by **Adex_Xeda** » January 24, 2004, 1:17 am

So you've read things that argue Al Qaeda has grown in strenght?

Brotha · Post by **Brotha** » January 24, 2004, 2:11 am

Adex_Xeda wrote:So you've read things that argue Al Qaeda has grown in strenght?

Think this is what Kelshara is referring to (thx google):

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0121-04.htm

From the looks of it they're making the same arguments the Surrender err I mean Democratic party is making.

And we're gonna smoke out the terrorists in Saudi Arabia, in Iran, in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, in Turkey, in France, in Germany, in Indonesia, in Syria, and in Morroco!! YEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » January 24, 2004, 12:25 pm

I got the article from a Norwegian paper, it's not exactly the same but has some of the same information in it.

Keverian FireCry · Post by **Keverian FireCry** » January 24, 2004, 5:49 pm

From the looks of it they're making the same arguments the Surrender err I mean Democratic party is making.

Another classic Brotha quote. Good representation of how pathetically moronic he is.

Chidoro · Post by **Chidoro** » January 26, 2004, 9:29 am

Brotha wrote:And we're gonna smoke out the terrorists in Saudi Arabia,

With the oil monger Bush in office? BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

in Pakistan, in Turkey, in France, in Germany, in Indonesia, in Syria, and in Morroco!! YEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!

I'd say the answers to that little gem can be simply answered by saying, nuke capable county-never; pseudo ally-never; riiight; yeah sure just like they got 'em all living five minutes from me here in Jersey; keep thinking Indo will "smoke 'em out; or else we gonna bomb 'em!; Morocco is what I think you meant, better learn to spell it else you may bomb the wrong country!

What's funny is that you actually think that killing five terrorists doesn't turn ten America haters into terrorists. But I guess you can just WIPE 'EM ALL OUT, DIE TURBAN FREAKS! LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT!! LET'S ROLL!!1!1 BLAH BLAH BLAH DROOL

Adex_Xeda · Post by **Adex_Xeda** » January 26, 2004, 11:53 am

I belive Brotha was joking. I doubt you should take those particular words as serious representations of his character.

Pahreyia · Post by **Pahreyia** » January 26, 2004, 12:38 pm

Chidoro wrote:
Brotha wrote:And we're gonna smoke out the terrorists in Saudi Arabia,
With the oil monger Bush in office? BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

I fail to see how anyone could see that quote as having anything to do with Bush being in office, as it's a parody of the Howard Dean speech. And I'd honestly like to see how any of the democrat candidates would handle security and terrorism. Regardless of whether or not people believe that the next 9/11 is around the corner, security has become a huge issue for most Americans.

I have done very little research on the democratic candidates lately, and maybe they've addressed this, but frankly, I didn't care enough to ask before now. I think they're a bunch of flops, personally. The democratic party could have done a lot better than Howard Dean or John Kerry IMO.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » January 26, 2004, 3:21 pm

Pahreyia wrote: And I'd honestly like to see how any of the democrat candidates would handle security and terrorism.

I have done very little research on the democratic candidates lately, and maybe they've addressed this, but frankly, I didn't care enough to ask before now.

Do you even listen to yourself yammer?

Voronwë · Post by **Voronwë** » January 26, 2004, 3:46 pm

would you say a decorated war hero (or two) would be more qualified to take a stand on security than George Bush, Pahreyia?

i'm just curious if you can articulate your criteria for why no Democratic candidate can equal George Bush's ability to appropriately handle the military task of securing the USA.

i'm going to let you specifically rebut with respect to the following 2 candidates:

Former NATO Commander, General Wesley Clark. Decorated war hero in vietnam, first in his class at West Point, etc.

Senator John Kerry, also decorated war hero in Vietnam. Served on senate Foreign Relations committee.

take your time

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » January 26, 2004, 3:55 pm

I vote for below average texas governor who had to have tutors come over to his house before running for president because he didn't know what an Iraq was.

Kelshara · Post by **Kelshara** » January 26, 2004, 4:10 pm

Of course, Bush has done such a good job of securing the US! I mean, people still don't just walk onto aircrafts with stunguns and knives! And there is absolutely no terrorist threat anymore!