Avatar Poll!
Posted: January 26, 2004, 8:51 pm
As requested.
Page 1 of 1
Posted: January 26, 2004, 8:54 pm
Aranuil is my puppet.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 8:55 pm
I'm pressing my chubby cock on the monitor screen where my Avatar should be.
now there is a little grease spot ... that is my new avatar.
now there is a little grease spot ... that is my new avatar.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 8:56 pm
As a joke, it would be fun to say something about it being my duty to serve the booty.
But I won't do that.
But I won't do that.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 9:01 pm
on clicking on " i don't care " i was at first thinking, it's their boards, they own it, they pay for it, etc....but then i remembered that a handful of people donated their own money to make VV a bigger and better and faster place...
personally i really don't care. i come to VV to read the threads and sometimes post something retarded. i don't even look at the avatars half the time.
if you view these boards at work, it is at your own risk. no one is forcing you to log in at work.
personally i really don't care. i come to VV to read the threads and sometimes post something retarded. i don't even look at the avatars half the time.
if you view these boards at work, it is at your own risk. no one is forcing you to log in at work.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 9:04 pm
I agree with the NWS rules, but I don't care about the sizes.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 9:06 pm
I'm going to pay attention to this thread just to see if two people vote for "I don't know / I am Mukyluk"...
Posted: January 26, 2004, 9:07 pm
Voted yes.
I don't care so much to what people post, as long as it's labled NWS if it's nws. Avatars aren't.
/shrug
I don't care so much to what people post, as long as it's labled NWS if it's nws. Avatars aren't.
/shrug
Posted: January 26, 2004, 9:10 pm
gee i seem to have adjusted to the change just fine.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 9:10 pm
God damnit, that option added ~= Yes as a temporary solution.
><
><
Posted: January 26, 2004, 9:42 pm
I voted yes as a temp solution. Merely for the fact that the NWS avatars needed to be dealt with. Beyond that, no, I don't agree at all.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 9:46 pm
So size doesn't matter to you? Meaning 200K+ avatars/sigs you can agree with?Pahreyia wrote:I voted yes as a temp solution. Merely for the fact that the NWS avatars needed to be dealt with. Beyond that, no, I don't agree at all.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 9:52 pm
nt double post
Posted: January 26, 2004, 9:52 pm
To be completely honest, I personally don't care about the size. I'm always on a high speed connection, so it's not a big deal to me.
Having said that, the fact that it's an important issue for other users on the board makes it worth supporting a size restriction.
Having said that, the fact that it's an important issue for other users on the board makes it worth supporting a size restriction.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 9:52 pm
I don't really care. But I voted yes in spite of the people who are such whiney bitches about having their avatars taken away. Who the fuck cares, you can find something other than women rubbing their boobs and spreading their legs for your fucking avatars.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 10:12 pm
Honestly, I have 1.5MB DSL at home and T1 at work. The female groping avatars were much higher on my shit list than 200k avatars.Aslanna wrote:So size doesn't matter to you? Meaning 200K+ avatars/sigs you can agree with?Pahreyia wrote:I voted yes as a temp solution. Merely for the fact that the NWS avatars needed to be dealt with. Beyond that, no, I don't agree at all.
That's not to say I don't care. I'd prefer all avatars under 50k, but it's less of an issue to me at the moment.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 10:17 pm
I have high-speed as well so they didn't really affect me. But I realize not everyone is so lucky.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 10:18 pm
Pahreyia wrote: That's not to say I don't care. I'd prefer all avatars under 50k, but it's less of an issue to me at the moment.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 10:23 pm
Aranuil wrote:Having said that, the fact that it's an important issue for other users on the board makes it worth supporting a size restriction.
Posted: January 26, 2004, 10:29 pm
Yes, I read that just fine the first time. But the original message I quoted had you saying that other than NWS avatars you didn't agree with the change. Which is why I was seeking clarification.Pahreyia wrote:Pahreyia wrote: That's not to say I don't care. I'd prefer all avatars under 50k, but it's less of an issue to me at the moment.
Damn the man!
Posted: January 27, 2004, 12:05 am
Cid's avatar should be grandfathered in. Only exception.
Posted: January 27, 2004, 12:16 am
Heh, it was the female groping avatars that were 250-350k.Honestly, I have 1.5MB DSL at home and T1 at work. The female groping avatars were much higher on my shit list than 200k avatars.
WTF, if everyone had a 300k avatar you'd be dowloading 6-7 megs of completely useless shit for every fucking thread.
Posted: January 27, 2004, 12:47 am
ahhh... the wonderful work of caching
Posted: January 27, 2004, 1:01 am
the concept NWS should be defined and then etched in stone, then the rest of the world can have a good laugh at what amish choirboy daycarecenter corporate america has turned into.Pahreyia wrote:I voted yes as a temp solution. Merely for the fact that the NWS avatars needed to be dealt with. Beyond that, no, I don't agree at all.
a woman in bikini with more then 45 % between her legs
"i dont know davey"
pudr !
Posted: January 27, 2004, 1:07 am
Those animated avatars were clips from porno movies, just before the clothes came off. I don't know how much more NWS you can get. Cid's avatar, honestly, I have no problem with. Those I do. Call me a hypocrite if you want, but in my uninformed and self centered opinion, those crossed _that_ line.
Posted: January 27, 2004, 2:42 pm
Same here...Akaran_D wrote:Voted yes.
I don't care so much to what people post, as long as it's labled NWS if it's nws. Avatars aren't.
Posted: January 27, 2004, 2:45 pm
What Shaerra said goes double for me!Shaerra wrote:Same here...Akaran_D wrote:Voted yes.
I don't care so much to what people post, as long as it's labled NWS if it's nws. Avatars aren't.
Posted: January 27, 2004, 3:56 pm
I want to be more like Tenr.
Posted: January 27, 2004, 4:37 pm
Well, so far only 13 people voted a firm 'No'.
VV has always been a (mostly) self-policing community. The members of the community are who influence things around here (to a certain extent). Seems the majority think some people should limit their NWS shenanigans to the appropriate place. Which was created for that very reason. It doesn't seem like an unreasonable request to me. And from the votes (thus far), to most of the other people here.
VV has always been a (mostly) self-policing community. The members of the community are who influence things around here (to a certain extent). Seems the majority think some people should limit their NWS shenanigans to the appropriate place. Which was created for that very reason. It doesn't seem like an unreasonable request to me. And from the votes (thus far), to most of the other people here.
Posted: January 28, 2004, 11:48 pm
Is mine considered NWS? It's rather out of focus and I actually asked one of my managers if they had a problem with it, which she didn't, but then she saw some of the others. I can change mine if needed. My only problem with my avatar are the constant requests for the other pictures...
Posted: January 29, 2004, 12:06 am
Boogahz just got me fired. You fucker.
Posted: January 29, 2004, 12:14 am
Yeah, I called your boss because of the PM's! 