Page 1 of 1
Rolling Stone's 100 Greatest Guitarists of All Time?
Posted: December 5, 2003, 4:18 pm
by Xyphir
A while back, Rolling Stone published it's
100 Greatest Guitarists of All Time.
I know there was
a topic on this a while back, but I posted the list for Pure hilarity. Kurt Cobain #12?! Gimme a break.
Notables MISSING from the list are:
Joe Satriani
Eric Johnson
Steve Vai
Yngwie Malmsteen
Kenny Wayne Sheppard
Johnny Ramone #16?! I want what they're smokin!
Prince
Slash
Posted: December 5, 2003, 4:24 pm
by noel
I know little to nothing about actually playing a guitar, and I'll be the first to admit that I haven't heard a lot of the mentioned guitarists but...
Kind of hard to argue with #1 Hendrix, #3 BB King.
How the fuck does #17 Jack White of the White Stripes make a list of the greatest of ALL TIME? That REMAINS TO BE SEEN.
Finally, how the fuck is Eddie Van Halen #70? Last I checked, he was considered pretty good. Definitely Steve Vai needs to be on the list...
Again, I really know little about it, but I do know that I stopped reading Rolling Stone years ago because it's probably the second most vapid magazine after Details that exists...
Posted: December 5, 2003, 4:41 pm
by Laliana

Kenny Wayne Sheppard.
Hi Xman!!!!

Posted: December 5, 2003, 5:04 pm
by Truant
Rolling Stone is many times very biased towards what's popular.
Occasionally you can find a few decent non mainstream reveiws, but for the most part, the only thing I find interesting is the history or the bi-annual interview with someone like Dylan, or Bowie, or whoever other great it may be.
But, in their defense in this particular instance. Think more of their impact on music and it's direction than of their guitar skill.
Example, Satriani, Vai, Malmsteen...sure those guys could probably destroy the Underworld with guitars...but does anyone outside of the guitar playing world know who they are? Not really.
Cobain and Ramone...they were definately not virtuoso caliber...but look at what their playing and their sound did to music.
Eddie Van Halen at 70? I'd put him lower personally. Sure Eddie has some phenomenal fingers. But his music is fucking boring as shit.
The Jack White thing...I dunno...the sound is something new and refreshing to hear...how it will stand up to time, we'll see...I'll chalk that up to keeping the popular crowd happy.
Posted: December 5, 2003, 6:53 pm
by Xzion
12. Kurt Cobain of Nirvana
WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT? sure he could write some good tunes but based on his skill level i dont think he would be anywhere near the top 100
at least they did a good job with 11Kirk Hammett, best heavy metal gitarist of all time
Stevie Ray Vaughan is quite a bit better then Clapton, but there both badass so not that much of a rant
Posted: December 5, 2003, 9:07 pm
by Aslanna
Prince is really an underrated guitar player. I believe I mentioned that in that previous thread. If you overlook his semi-weirdness. He sure the hell is better than Kurt Cobain that's for certain. Whoever compiled that list was on crack or something. Just one reason, of many, I don't subscribe to Rolling Stone.
Posted: December 6, 2003, 5:24 am
by Karae
It makes a bit more sense when you don't read 100 Greatest as 100 Most Skilled...
I was surprised by Slash's absence also though. I've always considered GNR an influential and historically important band. Not to mention his name is recognizable on it's own whereas many of the guitarists listed have to be listed with their band names so you'll know who the fuck they are.
Posted: December 6, 2003, 3:27 pm
by Syenye Squirrellyelf
WHY WASN'T CREED ON THE LIST?
Posted: December 7, 2003, 2:48 pm
by Sartori
Maybe a little ironic, but thank god they weren't.
You get the top 100 based on skill out of the guitar mags, don't go lookin for it in crap like RS.
Posted: December 8, 2003, 5:51 pm
by Xyphir
Color me biased, but Trey Anastasio (Phish) at number 73 irks me. For my own list, I put his style and influence up there in the top 50, and probably the top 30. Trey played with Carlos Santana (#15) earlier this year and he not only kept up with Carlos , but I thought he played better. If you've never been to a Phish show and seen Trey live, you're truly missing out. I've never seen someone take energy from the audience and is able to channel it through himself like he does. It's 'other-worldly'.
Another guitarist absent from that I'd put on my list is Keller Williams. He's rather folky, but one of the most incredible artists I've ever seen perform. He is a one-man-show. His act incorporated this 'looping' device which takes clips from his music and he'll have up to a dozen different loops playing. You'd think there was a whole troop of people on stage until you realize there's just one person making all that noice.
Robert Randolph (#97) is another name to watch out for. Probably not worthy of the top 100, but a rising star, for sure. He plays steel pedal guitar, which is commonly used for country/western (insert Blues Brother quote here), but has applied his own style. The result is nothing short of amazing. I saw him perform in NYC this year, and it rocked.
Laliana wrote:Hi Xman!!!!
Heya Lali!

Posted: December 8, 2003, 6:54 pm
by Ducru
Xzion wrote:12. Kurt Cobain of Nirvana
WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT? sure he could write some good tunes but based on his skill level i dont think he would be anywhere near the top 100
The funny thing is that Cobain could )allegedly) barely play a lick of guitar when Nirvana decided to write music, and even funnier is the fact that Dave Grohl pretty much wrote everything and got zero credit until the Foo Fighters.
Also... did I just overlook Stanley Jordan? quickly browsed the list and didn't see him... That's a disgrace.
Ooo oo and the twins from "Nelson"... R O C K!!!
Ducru
Posted: December 8, 2003, 6:57 pm
by Ducru
Sorry for back to back post, but wanted this to stand out on it's own after my stupid Nelson joke...
35 John Fahey
If you've never heard this guy... please check him out. He deserves it a lot.
Ducru
Posted: December 9, 2003, 7:57 pm
by Arundel Pajo
Kevin Shields better be on that list...
edit) ok...so he is... but 95??? What the HELL, people? o_O
Posted: December 15, 2003, 9:07 pm
by Fairweather Pure
26 Tom Morello of Rage Against the Machine and Audioslave
He should be in the top 10. He's unbelievable.
Posted: December 15, 2003, 10:02 pm
by Canelek
The list is certainly geared toward popular musicians....but then again, that is what Rolling Stone is all about... and putting Steve Howe that far down on the list is laughable... but he never was quite as popular as most of the others.
Posted: December 28, 2003, 10:37 pm
by Dregor Thule
Wtf, where is Raffi?
Posted: January 23, 2004, 2:26 am
by Tenuvil
John Petrucci should be #1 on that list. The fact that he isn't even on the list shows how awful RS is these days.
Posted: January 23, 2004, 6:13 pm
by Drinsic Darkwood
I'd definitely put Petrucci and Hammett in the top 5...
... Petrucci not being on the list at all is just fucking retarded to be blunt
Posted: January 23, 2004, 9:21 pm
by Deneve
w00t, Adam Jones!
Posted: January 23, 2004, 10:03 pm
by Arborealus
Hrmmm lets see Andres Segovia? Al Dimeola? Jango Rhinehart? Wes Montgomery? Leo Kottke?...What a silly name for that list...There are certainly some good and influential musicians on the list...but wtf = great?..

Posted: January 23, 2004, 10:57 pm
by Keverian FireCry
Well they didn't say "most-talented". Stupid list =)