VeeshanVault

Centerfold within 12 months would be my bet.


Anyone else think that ass is airbrushed?

oh my

Who the hell is that?

dog chow dog

woof

Britney Spears on the cover of November's Esquire magazine.

Syndaen Crystalthorn wrote:Britney Spears on the cover of November's Esquire magazine.

That is NOT Britney Spears!!! It looks nothing like here!!!

That's quite the pooper.

Somethings not right though. Those fuckme pumps don't go with the outfit. They look like daisey duck shoes.

Cool photo, does a pretty good job of making her look attractive, which sometimes she doesn't really appear to be!

Very Marilyn Monroe-ish... which I'm guessing was the point.

That ass is airbrushed, it looks way too fake.

How could you have a thigh like that end in an ass like that? I just doesn't seem possible. I'm not knocking her thighs, I'm just saying they are out of proportion to her ass.

I don't like her new make-up either..makes her look older ya, but not good.

Go back to bad girl brittney...and don't paint your ass.

I guess it is her...

pretty damned hot looking too!

she has been working hard lately trying to change her image.

I saw a layout she did in M magazine a couple of months ago where she looked really good and not like the stupid skank look she usually goes for. its too bad she really doesnt have image that reflects on her musical style though since she's never written a word of a song in her entire life and her only job is to look good while singing other people's songs.

I don't like music stars like britney spears a lot. I prefer people who at least contribute to their songs if not outright write them by themselves. they could at least learn to play a fucking musical instrument or do something other than look good. she's not even that great of a singer.

Its a take off of a picture of Angie Dickenson from 1966.

kyoukan wrote:she has been working hard lately trying to change her image.

I saw a layout she did in M magazine a couple of months ago where she looked really good and not like the stupid skank look she usually goes for. its too bad she really doesnt have image that reflects on her musical style though since she's never written a word of a song in her entire life and her only job is to look good while singing other people's songs.

I don't like music stars like britney spears a lot. I prefer people who at least contribute to their songs if not outright write them by themselves. they could at least learn to play a fucking musical instrument or do something other than look good. she's not even that great of a singer.

if it sells...

I'd hit it !

Stalker Vacio wrote:I'd hit it !

word~`

she has been working hard lately trying to change her image.

You have to do something when your popularity is falling.

Think that Madonna kiss was spontaneous? I don't.

Great ass!

after reading up a few months ago how they air brushed Kate Winslet's thighs in some magazine I don't believe this picture
nothing against Britney, she looks like a doll

Writing the song is only a part of a preformance.

Saying she isn't talented just because she didn't write her own songs is like saying your inferior because you aren't the president of the company you work for....it's just not true.

If she didn't have talent they would have picked someone else to sing the songs. There are girls far prettier then Brittney Spears. The girl can sing pretty nice, she can dance ok, she looks pretty good...and I assume she changes the songs after she gets them a bit.

Yes, there are people who can do all of that by themselves. But just because some do, doesn't mean she has to as well. Most of those other people don't do as many public appearances etc and are much older then she is.

I mean...I'm not saying she's great...I'm just saying that not writing her own songs is a minor issue.

Obviously the people who write thier songs should record them if they could do better without her.

thats rachel leigh cook in the first picture, look at her face.

Thank You !! New desktop (for a couple days or "sessions"

Looks like a manequin, jesus I can't spell. You know those fucking plastic things they stick in store windows to model clothes, yeah those...

who cares, she's beautiful

*yawn*

Man, that girl has an amazing body. Airbrushed or not, it's still amazing. While I'm sure some will disagree with me (sup Atokal? ) I think she's one hundred times hotter now than she was when she came out with that first video.

Britney = My girlfriend.

Hate to break it to you Pils, but she can't really sing all that great. In a lot of the songs you don't even hear her true voice. It's all processed and effects. It's all about the image and the packaging.

Sylvus wrote:Man, that girl has an amazing body. Airbrushed or not, it's still amazing. While I'm sure some will disagree with me (sup Atokal? ) I think she's one hundred times hotter now than she was when she came out with that first video.

Sup Sylvus, No disagreement here. She is better looking now than when she first appeared on the pop music scene.

I thought you were talking of the poet, Brittney, from Compton... liar!



PS: Ms. Spears is pretty hot on her own without all the lights and whatnot.... better even.. that SNL skit with her as the butter-churner...

Looks pretty damn nice to me

To the women who have complained about being treated like objects...

This is why.

a woman can't dress sexy or in a teasing manner without being treated like an object and it's our fault?

Teasing? She's wearing NO FUCKING PANTS OR PANTIES (In any event, it's obviously intended to at least *look* that way). Btw - I love it.

yes showing skin is called teasing. I don't see why being titillated by a half naked woman is synonymous with the desire to use her for sexual gratification and ignore everything else about her.

such big words , titilation , gratification , synonymous ... hell ide hit it and I spank the monkey , flog the dolphin etc .... ahhh the joy of self pleasures

I would kill each of you in a different manner merely if I was allowed to bury my nose in her cleft.

I work for a company that uses Elizabeth Murphy as one of it's models. I know for a fact a lot of air brushing is done...a lot.

kyoukan wrote:yes showing skin is called teasing. I don't see why being titillated by a half naked woman is synonymous with the desire to use her for sexual gratification and ignore everything else about her.

and if it was a half naked man women would respond in the same manner.

it looks like she has a penis ...

You just think she does because cock is the only thing on your mind

kyoukan wrote:yes showing skin is called teasing. I don't see why being titillated by a half naked woman is synonymous with the desire to use her for sexual gratification and ignore everything else about her.

In a photograph all you get is the image. It's hard to strike up a deep intellectual conversation with a centerfold in a nudie magazine... believe me, I've tried.

emmer wrote:

kyoukan wrote:yes showing skin is called teasing. I don't see why being titillated by a half naked woman is synonymous with the desire to use her for sexual gratification and ignore everything else about her.

In a photograph all you get is the image. It's hard to strike up a deep intellectual conversation with a centerfold in a nudie magazine... believe me, I've tried.

Esquire isn't a nudie magazine!

what I'm saying is it's easy to ignore everything about a person except appearance in a photograph because that's all you are given

for example while I am listening to her music I am slightly less inclined to entertain the desire of pulling an advanced black bee on ms. spears than I would be staring at a picture of her bare ass

hope that clears things up

emmer wrote:an advanced black bee

Unfamiliar with the term, please elucidate.

Sylvus wrote:

emmer wrote:an advanced black bee

Unfamiliar with the term, please elucidate.

!!!!

NWS http://www.condoms5.com/positions5/legTop_position.html

That's what I got on I'm Feeling Lucky from google!

THat's a majorly retouched photo.

She's an untalented skank regardless...

kyoukan wrote:yes showing skin is called teasing. I don't see why being titillated by a half naked woman is synonymous with the desire to use her for sexual gratification and ignore everything else about her.

It's an emotive action, it's done to elicit a response and you get all bitchy if it's not a response from the right person. If I go around with one ball hanging out I'm arrested, but you have all but your nipple showing and it's my bad for staring...

Remind me to walk around a lesbian rally with a "No Fat Chicks" t-shirt on then blame them when they beat the snot out of me

Kguku wrote:

kyoukan wrote:yes showing skin is called teasing. I don't see why being titillated by a half naked woman is synonymous with the desire to use her for sexual gratification and ignore everything else about her.

and if it was a half naked man women would respond in the same manner.

sad, but true

brittney really does have a great body, but that photo is just disgustingly airbrushed. personally i'd rather see a few flaws and know it's a real person, but i'm weird...

edit: and by "a few flaws" NO i do NOT mean a big fat pimple on the ass or something

Drewno wrote:Teasing? She's wearing NO FUCKING PANTS OR PANTIES

How do we know she's not wearing a thong!?