VeeshanVault

?

Is that short for Anchovieman?

better?

I think Anchovieman was better!

Zoolander wasn't very good.

Spang wrote:Zoolander wasn't very good.

I agree with the veggie on this.

The other movie wasn't anything special either but I voted for it over Zoo.

Hmmm

Zoolander = the walkoff, Bowie cameo, coolest sex scene in any movie ever....
Anchorman = nothing really....

Not that hard to decide

They were both pretty awful but Ben Stiller is magnitudes worse than Will Ferrell. Stiller has an aura of suck about him that nearly equals Tom Cruise's.

I wish we somehow had the age of the people who voted, along with their vote. I feel like people younger than me would all say anchorman, while people older than me would say zoolander.

This 32-year-old voted for Anchorman.

Aabidano wrote:They were both pretty awful but Ben Stiller is magnitudes worse than Will Ferrell.

But ZOOLANDER has BOTH Ben Stiller AND Will Ferrell!!!1

The gasoline fight in Zoolander is comedy gold.

miir wrote:The gasoline fight in Zoolander is comedy gold.

It's filled with very funny moments assembled by a chimp with late stage syphilis. Similar to dodge ball, the overall effect makes me want to spew.

One or two doses of Ben Stiller is all that should ever have been. There's Something About Mary and the Original Meet the Parents. Stop there.

They're both stupid movies, but anything with Will Ferrell in it sucks more than anything it's compared to. In this case, he was in Anchorman more than Zoolander so that's how the vote goes.

Queue up the cowbell defenders in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2..

Can we get an option for "Neither?"

Siji wrote:Queue up the cowbell defenders in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2..

That was unfunny as well. About the only thing I've seen Christopher W. in that I didn't like.

I thought Zoolander was terrible. Many parts of it actually really annoy me.

Anchorman on the other hand I thought was hilarious. The Jazz flute part, the big fight, etc all cracked me up

I think Will Ferrell is hilarious. Very infrequently I see him in something I don't think is hilarious, recently I watched "The Other Guys"... That movie was really funny.


I love lamp.

Watch out for soup kitchens

Aabidano wrote:

Siji wrote:Queue up the cowbell defenders in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2..

That was unfunny as well. About the only thing I've seen Christopher W. in that I didn't like.

I thought W's role in Balls of Fury was terribly misguided.

Leonaerd wrote:

Aabidano wrote:

Siji wrote:Queue up the cowbell defenders in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2..

That was unfunny as well. About the only thing I've seen Christopher W. in that I didn't like.

I thought W's role in Balls of Fury was terribly misguided.

Terrible movie but in a good way.

Awesome movie, held back by W.

liked both....voted Anchorman.

I did not like Anchorman the first time I viewed it....subsequent viewings made me really appreciate it.



Mister Burgundy! You have a massive erection!

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:I did not like Anchorman the first time I viewed it....subsequent viewings made me really appreciate it.

Heh that's funny, the first time I watched it I just didn't get it either.

I voted Zoolander. At least I made it all the way through that one.

I voted for Anchorman because it's gotten funnier with repeated viewings. Zoolander is OK, but doesn't have the "LOLGASFIGHT" effect after that first time.

boy, that escalated quickly

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YoKAcVL_ ... ata_player

For what they were, Zoolander was competent and Anchorman excelled. Both are enjoyable to me, but Anchorman is clearly superior. There was a wider variety of gags, a larger enamble cast that was used extremely well, and it was a lot more consistent from beginning to end. As far as plain old whacky characters, both Zoolander and Ron Burgendy are right up there with the best of all time alongside Ace Ventura and Austin Powers. I can watch any of these movies over and over and laugh my ass off every single time.