VeeshanVault

.... is exactly how I'd picture someone like Satan.

Hell of a movie.

Of course now that the USA network has it they'll play it every day for a month until I'm sick of seeing it.

No nudity in the USA version. =(

seeing the regular cable TV version of that movie would fuck it up =/
see the real one

I just cant watch any more movies that have commercial interuptions. Those interuptions just drive me bonkers.

I like the Satan from "Bedazzled" a hell of a lot more.

Adex_Xeda wrote:Of course now that the USA network has it they'll play it every day for a month until I'm sick of seeing it.

FX has already done that, along with many other movies that were once good to watch.

Ogbar wrote: I like the Satan from "Bedazzled" a hell of a lot more.

Elizabeth Hurley....SHWING !

there's only two memorable Satan roles Pacino in Devil's Advocate and Nicholson in Witches of Eastwick

If they only replaced Keanu and Cher in those movies they'd be perfect


ok Hurley as Satan too, although I still don't know why that movie was ever made, it sucked so badly

It was made because they figured Hurley would draw in a crowd period. Hot women as a devil thats the draw in.

Isn't jennifer love hewitt filming a movie where she plays the devil?

Mmmmm...yummy,

I'm serious BTW, I think I heard it in an old radio interview right before "The Tuxedo" with Jackie Chan was released. Like in October.

Someone else can like do the research or something. It's late and I have to take a dump.

Laters.

I thought bedazzled was pretty funny. I liked the scene when he was the world's most sensitive man. I probably would have thought worse of it had I paid money to see it in a theater, but it was okay to watch on sattelite.

elizabeth hurley kind of needs to go back to pushing her breast implants up above her earline and posing in underwear ads though, because the woman just cannot act.

elizabeth hurley kind of needs to go back to pushing her breast implants up above her earline and posing in underwear ads though, because the woman just cannot act.

You must then ask yourself.
Does she really Need, to act?

If she's going to be in movies yes. Anyone who pays money to see a movie (not talking pornos here, perverts!) just because it has a "hawt chick" in it deserves to sit two hours through a shitty movie and be made fun of as they leave the theater.


Oh, and just about any movie is going to suck once it's been 'Edited for Television'. Especially an R-rated movie.

No she can keep acting in movies... I just won't pay for them and watch them when they are on HBO... such as Bedazzled

Ennia wrote:ok Hurley as Satan too, although I still don't know why that movie was ever made, it sucked so badly

It was a remake. In the original movie Satan was a man though.

Yum, Charlize Theron has to be one of the top 10 hottest women on the planet.

I cannot believe you all are into Hurley, she is hot, but hell she must suck in the sack, otherwise why would her boyfriend be out doing 10 dollar hookers who look more mannish than Brett Farve?

Ennia wrote:ok Hurley as Satan too, although I still don't know why that movie was ever made, it sucked so badly

Grant and Hurley jointly own the studio/company that produced it

[quote="Aabidano]Grant and Hurley jointly own the studio/company that produced it [/quote]

well that explains a lot

Hurley is a pretty girl, hence my personal icon, I also like what she did with Bing and his petty money. But the girl is so much better as a model than as an actress

Charlize has been one of my favorite actresses for a while now. Just watched Trapped on New year, she and Kevin Bacon can keep me glued to the screen for hours.