Roger Clemens
-
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: September 30, 2002, 6:58 pm
- XBL Gamertag: launchpad1979
- Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Roger Clemens
Clemens comes out of retirement for the third time and signs a 22 million $ contract for 1 year. Since he will only be pitching half the season, he will take home 12.5 million. Thats crazy for an old pitcher.
- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
-
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: September 30, 2002, 6:58 pm
- XBL Gamertag: launchpad1979
- Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Trek wrote:he had a 1.90 era or some crap last season, how can you not pitch well from July on and have that number?
Code: Select all
LAST 7 GAMES
Date Opp W L SV IP HA ER BBA SO
08/28 LA 0 0 0 6.0 2 0 2 5
09/03 STL 0 0 0 5.0 4 2 2 2
09/09 MIL 0 1 0 3.0 5 5 5 2
09/14 FLA 1 0 0 6.1 5 1 2 4
09/19 PIT 0 1 0 5.2 11 4 1 5
10/01 CHC 1 0 0 7.0 6 1 3 5
10/06 ATL 0 1 0 5.0 6 5 3 2
Roger Clemens had a brilliant year last season, and this is a no-brainer signing since he'll bring in at least as much money as he's being paid, regardless of how he pitches.
That said, I think his ERA was a wee bit inflated last year by the Astro's protection of him. There are some horses out there who will go out and throw no matter what. Clemens these days is pulled at the first sign of trouble. I don't know if they don't think he can work out of a funk during a game, or they want to protect his health, or his stats, or his ego, or what, but the man does not sit in and take a beating like many true aces do from time to time.
That said, I think his ERA was a wee bit inflated last year by the Astro's protection of him. There are some horses out there who will go out and throw no matter what. Clemens these days is pulled at the first sign of trouble. I don't know if they don't think he can work out of a funk during a game, or they want to protect his health, or his stats, or his ego, or what, but the man does not sit in and take a beating like many true aces do from time to time.
- Midnyte_Ragebringer
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 7062
- Joined: July 4, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Daellyn
- Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
He was in the top 20 in the NL for innings pitched, which is pretty decent for a 43 year old. Considering he had the least ammount of run support for any SP the whole year I would say thats pretty good. Nowadays 200-250 IP is normal he had 211.
In those last 7 'horrible' starts he had last season he pitch 5 or more innings in 6 of 7 games, so its not like he wasnt pitching enough innings. The year before he was top 10 in innings for the NL at 214.
As was eluded to before they are giving him the money because of who he is and what he brings to the club/organization. The had talked about wanting him again since last season, its not like he was looking for a job, they needed to send him a # that made him come back, apparently they found it.
In those last 7 'horrible' starts he had last season he pitch 5 or more innings in 6 of 7 games, so its not like he wasnt pitching enough innings. The year before he was top 10 in innings for the NL at 214.
As was eluded to before they are giving him the money because of who he is and what he brings to the club/organization. The had talked about wanting him again since last season, its not like he was looking for a job, they needed to send him a # that made him come back, apparently they found it.
I am by no means a baseball expert, in fact I hate pro baseball but I think it is just good sense to have soemone who can guarantee a few good innings a game. Even if he only goes five innings in every game then he is earning his money if he does well. I follow the local baseball and softball teams and the difference between the good and great teams are their depth at the pitching position.
Deward
- miir
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 11501
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 3:06 pm
- XBL Gamertag: miir1
- Location: Toronto
- Contact:
He lost 6 games last year 1-0.
Sucks to pitch for a team that gives you no run support.
He had two of his best seasons in Toronto on two pretty shitty teams.... at least he got some offensive support... I think he's an awesome pitcher but I don't really care for him personally. From interviews and the few times when he was playing for the Jays and he came off as being pretty aloof, self centered and not very sincere... but I guess none of that really matters on the field.
Sucks to pitch for a team that gives you no run support.
He had two of his best seasons in Toronto on two pretty shitty teams.... at least he got some offensive support... I think he's an awesome pitcher but I don't really care for him personally. From interviews and the few times when he was playing for the Jays and he came off as being pretty aloof, self centered and not very sincere... but I guess none of that really matters on the field.
I've got 99 problems and I'm not dealing with any of them - Lay-Z
Well, he averaged close to 7IP a game last year(Carpenter was just over 7), when you lose 6 1-0 games and have no run support the whole year that is damn good. In the NL the pitcher gets to bat, so they are pulled for pinch hitters in close games or when the situation is right, that means less IP on average per start. You also have to remember Houston had a pretty good pen that was topped off by some guy named Lidge.Lynks wrote:If every pitcher on your team only does 5 innings, you are going to burnout your bullpen. Superstars need to eat up 7 innings and more.
I totally disagree with that. He's an incredible pitcher, certainly, but I'd put Walter Johnson and Bob Gibson ahead of him at the least, Sandy Koufax was far superior for a shorter period of time, and modern-day I'd probably rank him above Randy Johnson but below Greg Maddux. He's better than Pedro, but I'd take a dominant Pedro season over a dominant Clemens season.I hope he does well. I personally think he is the greatest pitcher ever.
Postseason stats:
Roger Clemens: 34 games, 12-8, 3.71 ERA, 196.7 innings, 172 K's.
Bob Gibson: 9 games, 7-2, 1.89 ERA, 8 CG, 81 innings, 92 K's.
Both pitchers won an MVP award, which demonstrates that both were absolutely dominant at some point in their career. Gibson threw up what is among the best pitching season in baseball history:
34 games, 28 CG, 22-9, 13 SHO, 304 innings, 62 BB, 268 K's, 1.12 ERA
After that season, they lowered the mound.
Clemens has absolutely had a longer career, and has been more productive in total, but Gibson was better when he was at his best and was likely the greatest clutch pitcher in history, if not the greatest clutch player in history.
Walter Johnson is hard to compare, because he did a lot of pitching in the pre-Ruth era, but you have to like a guy who throws 6,000 innings, 110 shutouts, 531 complete games, and has a career era of 2.17. He also won 417 games playing for one of the worst teams in the majors, and probably could have crossed the 500 barrier if he played for the A's or the Yankees or someone like that.
Greg Maddux doesn't have the raw power of Clemens, but he's been far, far more consistent. The Braves had that streak of consecutive division titles going, he had that streak of 15-win seasons going, and, despite the Braves reputation for choking, Maddux has as many World Series titles (one) as Clemens. He also has fewer losses (one to three).
My big problem with Clemens as the 'best ever' is that, during a four-year stretch right in the middle of his prime, he went 11-14, 9-7 (strike-shortened), 10-5, and 10-13, with era's of 4.46, 2.85 (strike-shortened), 4.18 and 3.63. Also, his era's with the Yankees are 4.60, 3.70, 3.51, 4.35, and 3.91. That's just not very good. Since winning his first Cy, he's had three seasons with era's above 4 and 5 seasons with era's above 3. For a guy who is largely considered great because of the breadth and longevity of his work, that's a problem.
This was a long post.
- Canelek
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 9380
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 1:23 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Canelek
- Location: Portland, OR
He is a primadonna cocksucker just like Ken Griffey Jr, Barry Bonds and that other cocksucker, who's name escapes me atm. I don't care how much they pay you. Travel with the team, be part of the team and stop being such a loner-private-office cocksucker.
Oh yeah, that other cocksucker is Kevin Brown.
Fuck those guys and their fans.
Oh yeah, that other cocksucker is Kevin Brown.
Fuck those guys and their fans.
en kærlighed småkager
along with Charlie Robertson, and Don Larsen, and Len Barker, and Mike Witt, and David Wells, and David Cone, and Kenny Rogers, and Tom Browning
I also think Nolan Ryan is overrated as hell, but that's a separate discussion. Suffice it to say that his winning percentage is nearly identical to the cumulative winning percentages of the teams he played on. I'll do the math if you want.
Edit: Did the math.
Nolan Ryan:
324-292, .526
Nolan Ryan's teams:
2022-1969, .507
Difference: +.019
For comparisons sake, another big-armed hurler with a long career:
Walter Johnson:
417-279, .599
Walter Johnson's teams:
1559-1609, .492
Difference: +.107
I also think Nolan Ryan is overrated as hell, but that's a separate discussion. Suffice it to say that his winning percentage is nearly identical to the cumulative winning percentages of the teams he played on. I'll do the math if you want.
Edit: Did the math.
Nolan Ryan:
324-292, .526
Nolan Ryan's teams:
2022-1969, .507
Difference: +.019
For comparisons sake, another big-armed hurler with a long career:
Walter Johnson:
417-279, .599
Walter Johnson's teams:
1559-1609, .492
Difference: +.107
Last edited by Sueven on June 2, 2006, 1:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
So nine pitchers in the history of baseball have pitched a perfect game and Randy Johnson was one of them. Anyone ever do it twice?Sueven wrote:along with Charlie Robertson, and Don Larsen, and Len Barker, and Mike Witt, and David Wells, and David Cone, and Kenny Rogers, and Tom Browning
I thought seventeen pitchers have recorded perfect games. (only seven in the harder National League though)
While I respect Roger Clemens, I just don't like the guy. When he threw the end of the bat in the direction of Mike Piazza during the WS (nevermind he threw at his head a few times in the past, one of which put him on the DL) that pretty much solidified his place as a Pro PoS. He pitched in the AL at the time, and I was EXTREMELY disappointed that the Mets didn't drill him in the fuckin ear when he came to bat during intraleague play. Instead, they throw three feet behind him. Oooo... that sure is retribution for putting their HoF catcher on the DL. Yes, I would like him on my team, but the fact that he gets little run support means that either the hitters think they can slack off and can rely more on pitching or they just don't care for him. It just may be the latter. He certainly isn't the best pitcher in my book. Christy Mathewson, Cy Young, Walter Johnson, Sandy Koufax, Lefty Grove, Warren Spahn... take your pick. Hell, I'd probably put Satchel Paige before Roger Clemens.
- Boogahz
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 9438
- Joined: July 6, 2002, 2:00 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: corin12
- PSN ID: boog144
- Location: Austin, TX
- Contact:
Well, it's that time again. Clemens should decide if/where he'll be coming back this year in around two weeks. He was commenting during a local golf tournament that his agents have already been fielding calls from the Astros, Yankees, and Red Sox. He plans on going "away" for a couple weeks to get into pitching shape before making any decisions. Any bets/guesses on where he'll end up this time, and how much he'll get for it?
Saw a headline yesterday with a quote from him saying end of may was his personal deadline for the decision.
I could only see him playing for the Yankees if the money is retardedly more than anyone else. He does this because he wants more rings. He's trying to end up on the team that looks like it's going to win the whole shebang. Honestly, if the Yankees don't change something and get out of the funk they're in, I don't see him picking them.
(Disclaimer: Statements presented in the second paragraph are my opinion only and not intended to be represented as actual facts. Suck it.)
I could only see him playing for the Yankees if the money is retardedly more than anyone else. He does this because he wants more rings. He's trying to end up on the team that looks like it's going to win the whole shebang. Honestly, if the Yankees don't change something and get out of the funk they're in, I don't see him picking them.
(Disclaimer: Statements presented in the second paragraph are my opinion only and not intended to be represented as actual facts. Suck it.)
- masteen
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 8197
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 12:40 pm
- Gender: Mangina
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
Wait, did someone just say that Nolan Ryan wasn't one of the best pitchers ever? Nigga, is you crazy?
7 no-nos. SEVEN.
7 no-nos. SEVEN.
"There is at least as much need to curb the cruel greed and arrogance of part of the world of capital, to curb the cruel greed and violence of part of the world of labor, as to check a cruel and unhealthy militarism in international relationships." -Theodore Roosevelt
having just about their entire starting lineup on the dl doesn't help any team all that muchTruant wrote:Saw a headline yesterday with a quote from him saying end of may was his personal deadline for the decision.
I could only see him playing for the Yankees if the money is retardedly more than anyone else. He does this because he wants more rings. He's trying to end up on the team that looks like it's going to win the whole shebang. Honestly, if the Yankees don't change something and get out of the funk they're in, I don't see him picking them.
(Disclaimer: Statements presented in the second paragraph are my opinion only and not intended to be represented as actual facts. Suck it.)
The only person from the starting lineup that has been on the DL this season is Matsui. Posada missed a few games but was never actually on the DL. The Yankees have had 6 pitchers on (or are still on) the DL.Chidoro wrote:having just about their entire starting lineup on the dl doesn't help any team all that muchTruant wrote:Saw a headline yesterday with a quote from him saying end of may was his personal deadline for the decision.
I could only see him playing for the Yankees if the money is retardedly more than anyone else. He does this because he wants more rings. He's trying to end up on the team that looks like it's going to win the whole shebang. Honestly, if the Yankees don't change something and get out of the funk they're in, I don't see him picking them.
(Disclaimer: Statements presented in the second paragraph are my opinion only and not intended to be represented as actual facts. Suck it.)
So in summary, the starting line up is not the problem, the bullpen is.
Grats on Clemens btw.